Electromagnets Cornet ED25G

+ангел · Post by **+ангел** » Sun May 08, 2011 16:17

Greetings to all members of the forum

Propose to discuss the topic of electrosmog
release this device to measure it http://www.radmeters.com/Cornet-ED25G.html what it is interesting in one device combines the ability to measure as low pass 50Hz - 10KHz (Gauss meter). and high from RF100MHz to 3GHz
view video

in this video another modification of the device-

honestly impressive when lit yellow-oranzhevye and red LEDs that means you have exceeded the norms SanPiN
Firm the developer device is in California, city Santa Clara
datasheets for the devices http://s160930441.onlinehome.us/7.html
this video shows the impact of mobile phone
<

+ангел · Post by **+ангел** » Mon May 09, 2011 16:28

Video review of the device

Post by **Михаил_** » Mon May 09, 2011 18:20

so why is it? the same people just to scare... not to come under the influence can be living in nature in the house minimally using electronics.
To minimize the influence of possible parlor (sclerosis on my head, as it is called that??? I mean for appliances and cell phones).
Ordinary wire with the wall (in every apartment they are everywhere)is also kicking.... so in order to remove the influence, you need to remove not only cell phones, computers, etc., but the wiring. If it does not abandon the world, then you need to go to the source of direct voltage, such as a car 12 volts.

In General, all this is not trivial.
Not know it is bad, but to convince yourself everything is terrible - almost worse. It is better to minimize the impact, but isolated from the world, so that a chamber to help the sensors ... don't know.... better sensing his train

all this can easily be felt without the device and more accurately.

+ангел · Post by **+ангел** » Mon May 09, 2011 22:24

Michael Yes, such a device for example can be useful for testing shielding strength of some materials
at a certain point in space such that
http://www.aaroniausa.com/screeningMaterials.shtml

http://www.aaronia-shop.com/produkte/ab ... hield.html
http://www.sencom-sys.com/index.php?pag ... 192&id=200
http://www.tech-e.ru/aaronia_11_04_2011.php
http://www.aaronia.com/Datasheets/Scree ... d_50dB.pdf

dealer in Russia http://www.test-expert.ru/index.php?con ... iew&id=118

+ангел · Post by **+ангел** » Tue May 10, 2011 23:30

inexpensive device of the same company, it has less range overlap frequencies http://cgi.ebay.com/EMF-RF-Radiation-Fi ... 230fff53b4
and videos

<

Post by **Михаил_** » Thu May 12, 2011 0:07

You know ... I wouldn't bother

the fact is that impact factors are much more than just actually this the EMG could. Because it contains resonances with some devices, certain frequencies, and has not only direct impact but also indirect, which these devices can not be measured. Well, or something very indirectly... i.e. the information component can change the space around and / or to create biological component of the radiation, which is simply not filtered.
A simple example. Imagine the volume of which is noise filled with water and it is structured under the influence of this information from noise. Moreover, the noise is actually not noise, but just a lot of different factors, formed together (as if in the crowd, each shouting their own, but you can hear him scream).
So, water will penetrate everywhere carrying structure obtained up to the elements the absorption of smog.
In the usual case (when we are not under water), screening is also not enough, you need to create inside conditions favorable for the energy-information climate. And if they create, it is possible and shielding will not be as important.

+ангел · Post by **+ангел** » Tue May 17, 2011 16:17

devices from another manufacturer http://www.osuntech.com/

http://cgi.ebay.com/E-ALERT-EMF-RF-Radi ... 3999714989

+ангел · Post by **+ангел** » Tue May 17, 2011 16:44

about the dangers of electromagnetic fields translation by Google

Time magazine writes: those exposed to fields of 2 milligauss showed a threefold increase in risk, while children exposed to 3 milligauss showed a fourfold increase in the risk of leukemia. "Such as the clear progression makes it difficult to argue that factors besides exposure to electromagnetic fields was responsible for more cases of leukaemia ".

Time magazine writes that the study "... shows an unmistakable correlation between the degree of exposure and risk of childhood leukemia". The second study "... linked on-the-job exposure to electromagnetic fields and leukaemia in workers." "What makes the Karolinska study particularly important is the thoroughness of its design. The investigation covers nearly 500,000 people." "One of the most striking results was that the risk of cancer increased proportionally to the strength of the electromagnetic field. Children with constant exposure to weak fields, calculated at less than 1 milligauss (about the same that coffee produces when it is brewing), had low incidence of cancer. ""Numerous reports in the popular press trumpeted a warning." "... A growing number of scientific studies show that the risk of developing leukemia and other malignancies rises with exposure to electromagnetic fields."