BJ 2.1 / 2.2 / 2.4

Locked
Михаил_
Разработчик
Posts:10765
Joined:Fri Nov 03, 2006 4:29
Been thanked: 906 times
Re: BJ 2.1 / 2.2 / 2.4

Post by Михаил_ » Thu Jan 28, 2016 19:08

well samples such as paper, work perfectly :) and for a very long time :)

User avatar
Фиолет
Posts:79
Joined:Mon Apr 16, 2012 20:55
Has thanked: 32 times
Been thanked: 12 times

Re: BJ 2.1 / 2.2 / 2.4

Post by Фиолет » Fri Jan 29, 2016 13:06

Probes and BJ have all the functionality or simplified?

Мастер 108
Posts:384
Joined:Tue Oct 19, 2010 23:46
Has thanked: 1 time
Been thanked: 10 times

Re: BJ 2.1 / 2.2 / 2.4

Post by Мастер 108 » Fri Jan 29, 2016 14:54

The functionality can not be "simplified" - it is always full. Can differ only by "power". Though I have not used the samples, but many write that they are powerful and more than...

User avatar
Фиолет
Posts:79
Joined:Mon Apr 16, 2012 20:55
Has thanked: 32 times
Been thanked: 12 times

Re: BJ 2.1 / 2.2 / 2.4

Post by Фиолет » Fri Jan 29, 2016 16:15

Cool, the atoms I want BJ-doer to try and AMB, because komercheskaya version is still not available to me,not Mature enough yet :)

Михаил_
Разработчик
Posts:10765
Joined:Fri Nov 03, 2006 4:29
Been thanked: 906 times

Re: BJ 2.1 / 2.2 / 2.4

Post by Михаил_ » Sun Jan 31, 2016 5:21

do not interfere in one pile.... I mean better in turn...

User avatar
Фиолет
Posts:79
Joined:Mon Apr 16, 2012 20:55
Has thanked: 32 times
Been thanked: 12 times

Re: BJ 2.1 / 2.2 / 2.4

Post by Фиолет » Sun Jan 31, 2016 8:44

Perfectly normal :) because I want to clearly perceive the interaction with the artifact and enjoy the process with each device individually. :)

ММ
Posts:564
Joined:Sat Aug 28, 2010 18:56
Has thanked: 185 times
Been thanked: 40 times

Re: BJ 2.1 / 2.2 / 2.4

Post by ММ » Mon Feb 01, 2016 0:34

What better way to wrap up the probes that were not torn and not dirty?

User avatar
АндрейКо
Posts:1121
Joined:Thu Aug 23, 2012 21:18
Has thanked: 112 times
Been thanked: 71 times

Re: BJ 2.1 / 2.2 / 2.4

Post by АндрейКо » Mon Feb 01, 2016 1:11

ММ wrote:the better to wrap the probes that were not torn and not dirty?
remember, Michael told (in video or audio workshop) that the Americans with tape wrapped - the only question is how is the developer correctly :?

Владмосква
Posts:403
Joined:Wed Sep 22, 2010 12:14
Has thanked: 1 time
Been thanked: 7 times

Re: BJ 2.1 / 2.2 / 2.4

Post by Владмосква » Mon Feb 01, 2016 10:01

АндрейКо wrote:Michael told me...that the Americans with tape wrapped - the only question is how is the developer correct?
I heard him say "let the wind, I do not mind."

Владмосква
Posts:403
Joined:Wed Sep 22, 2010 12:14
Has thanked: 1 time
Been thanked: 7 times

Re: BJ 2.1 / 2.2 / 2.4

Post by Владмосква » Mon Feb 01, 2016 10:04

ММ wrote:the better to wrap probes
Note that contact with skin will disappear. Sometimes it is important. But the other way around on sleeve shirts/sweaters to wear to burns was not. Flow of energy and sensitivity at all different. Wrapped the probe in any area of the cocoon will remain and will work.

Владмосква
Posts:403
Joined:Wed Sep 22, 2010 12:14
Has thanked: 1 time
Been thanked: 7 times

Re: BJ 2.1 / 2.2 / 2.4

Post by Владмосква » Mon Feb 01, 2016 10:26

Михаил_ wrote:We have confirmation about the possibility to order billets of increased length, order.
Ordered? How soon will it appear? For legs would be good. Not on each leg standard fit. And hands hefty heroic sometimes there are :)

Михаил_
Разработчик
Posts:10765
Joined:Fri Nov 03, 2006 4:29
Been thanked: 906 times

Re: BJ 2.1 / 2.2 / 2.4

Post by Михаил_ » Tue Feb 02, 2016 14:51

Владмосква wrote:
Михаил_ wrote:We have confirmation about the possibility to order billets of increased length, order.
Ordered? How soon will it appear? For legs would be good. Not on each leg standard fit. And hands hefty heroic sometimes there are :)
While they do not exist. I've been thinking about shapes and types. There are a lot of interesting thoughts.

Михаил_
Разработчик
Posts:10765
Joined:Fri Nov 03, 2006 4:29
Been thanked: 906 times

Re: BJ 2.1 / 2.2 / 2.4

Post by Михаил_ » Tue Feb 02, 2016 14:54

АндрейКо wrote:
ММ wrote:the better to wrap the probes that were not torn and not dirty?
remember, Michael told (in video or audio workshop) that the Americans with tape wrapped - the only question is how is the developer correctly :?
our wound too. How correctly ? well, they were not to do was done well if people have no other way and money and so much want.... in General it is not correct of course, but I don't mind if it doesn't grow into a trend and it makes the person who does not have the opportunity to buy and somehow he homemade a little. generally, for such cases there are lots of products in the line of diys....

Владмосква
Posts:403
Joined:Wed Sep 22, 2010 12:14
Has thanked: 1 time
Been thanked: 7 times

Re: BJ 2.1 / 2.2 / 2.4

Post by Владмосква » Thu Feb 04, 2016 9:40

Михаил_ wrote:I'm thinking about the forms and types. There are a lot of interesting thoughts.
Types - good "bracelet 2.4 OS+" and "map transfer 2.4" to "2.2" is already out, exactly?

Petr99
Posts:446
Joined:Fri Oct 21, 2011 7:09
Has thanked: 3 times
Been thanked: 15 times

Re: BJ 2.1 / 2.2 / 2.4

Post by Petr99 » Thu Feb 04, 2016 9:50

Maybe the map transfer OS 2.4+? Wearing a sweater or shirt and fine and rigidity of products will be smooth???

Михаил_
Разработчик
Posts:10765
Joined:Fri Nov 03, 2006 4:29
Been thanked: 906 times

Re: BJ 2.1 / 2.2 / 2.4

Post by Михаил_ » Fri Feb 05, 2016 18:31

Maybe even enough to leave :) ?
I'm thinking about ordering some types of watches which have a cost comparable to the cost of procurement 2.4 (straps of all types from metal/skins Deputy/silicone, etc.).... me there really were laughing at the topic how will look for a few hours on the hands and feet as some avid BJ carrier....

PS shirt anything not smooth, and in 2.x and so to work.
zy2 really think to do little things differently :) :) :)

User avatar
АндрейКо
Posts:1121
Joined:Thu Aug 23, 2012 21:18
Has thanked: 112 times
Been thanked: 71 times

Re: BJ 2.1 / 2.2 / 2.4

Post by АндрейКо » Fri Feb 05, 2016 18:47

Михаил_ wrote:And maybe even enough to leave :) ?
Use 10 units of AMB as a bracelet for watches Casio :)

Михаил_
Разработчик
Posts:10765
Joined:Fri Nov 03, 2006 4:29
Been thanked: 906 times

Re: BJ 2.1 / 2.2 / 2.4

Post by Михаил_ » Sun Feb 07, 2016 1:02

Haha.... Actually I was a little annoyed that I can't keep low prices on products and had perverted from the cost of the ebony/limits the speed of production and other nonsense. Want a very powerful and harmonious for socks but any serializable solution :)
Actually card the transfer it was created, but the demand for them is significantly less than in regular BJ. Too alternative the very idea of moving :)
Similarly with translations and similarly there is a problem to sidelet form-factor cards - there are disadvantages.
of course, the structural elements of ebony is very good. But the thought of addressing a number of the above problems in mind wander. 2.4 in its current form I like but something else ... I think :) Technologically we can do much more powerful "transfer".... Although it is necessary to deal with. In fact so more powerful that Oh. and, in principle, for all versions. But simply, it is then not a classic just serial transfer, but something quite other principles. And while I'm not busy.

User avatar
АндрейКо
Posts:1121
Joined:Thu Aug 23, 2012 21:18
Has thanked: 112 times
Been thanked: 71 times

Re: BJ 2.1 / 2.2 / 2.4

Post by АндрейКо » Sun Feb 07, 2016 1:53

From the point of view of the buyer, the transfer map is probably the best choice, because one likes to wear bracelet, different watches, a third belt...
And even fans of ebony can buy a simple bracelet of black hole and with cards transfer to turn him into BJ the appropriate version.
(for example, right now the map transfer 2.1 is configured to sweater wife... and there are more exotic options - put for the night under the pillow)

Although I almost always had to buy everything, and sell it no experience... and offers may not be optimal.

Аннаель
Posts:46
Joined:Wed Jan 22, 2014 17:04
Has thanked: 36 times
Been thanked: 3 times

Re: BJ 2.1 / 2.2 / 2.4

Post by Аннаель » Sun Feb 07, 2016 15:08

Yes, the card transport is very convenient too use!

Михаил_
Разработчик
Posts:10765
Joined:Fri Nov 03, 2006 4:29
Been thanked: 906 times

Re: BJ 2.1 / 2.2 / 2.4

Post by Михаил_ » Sun Feb 07, 2016 19:11

For many it is a kind of alternative for consciousness as this card is separately :) and they want something wearable directly :)

User avatar
ЛанаЛана
Posts:52
Joined:Mon Jan 04, 2016 14:34
Has thanked: 82 times
Been thanked: 12 times

Re: BJ 2.1 / 2.2 / 2.4

Post by ЛанаЛана » Tue Feb 23, 2016 16:27

Got a card transfer 2.6...Wear her silver bracelet...the Castle is quite complicated for the everyday taking off and putting on hand...so I decided to wear it not taking off...But contact with water is frequent...Morning and evening shower...Plus working with kids...learn to draw...again contact with water....
Question...does the water on a loaded bracelet with card transfer? :)

User avatar
Фиолет
Posts:79
Joined:Mon Apr 16, 2012 20:55
Has thanked: 32 times
Been thanked: 12 times

Re: BJ 2.1 / 2.2 / 2.4

Post by Фиолет » Tue Feb 23, 2016 19:40

Lanalana water may enhance charged bracelet.Michael answered this question earlier that BJ's was stronger, even after taking a shower,bath.

Владмосква
Posts:403
Joined:Wed Sep 22, 2010 12:14
Has thanked: 1 time
Been thanked: 7 times

Re: BJ 2.1 / 2.2 / 2.4

Post by Владмосква » Sat Mar 05, 2016 5:29

2.4 and true fusion. I just drove for a long time :) I wear two pieces. There is a lot of fun and rewarding accidents, life changes drastically, the drive is added...

User avatar
кирагуиту
Posts:13
Joined:Sun Mar 13, 2016 12:11
Has thanked: 3 times

Re: BJ 2.1 / 2.2 / 2.4

Post by кирагуиту » Thu Mar 24, 2016 5:44

The guys asked a question on QM well, even here. Is it possible to watch charged 1.0 apply the label "CC 2.1"?

Locked