СК1М

Locked
Михаил_
Разработчик
Posts:10765
Joined:Fri Nov 03, 2006 4:29
Been thanked: 906 times

Post by Михаил_ » Wed Nov 24, 2010 0:21

верунчик wrote:And from the laziness saves :) Well, that's when you know that it will bring
favor and save it for later, well as for dessert, i.e. to move from observer to Creator
Well, I don't even know what to say :)
By the way, I have long tormented by the question whether to give the operator himself to set the anchor. Ultimately, I decided that there is such an option, but not required. :) So maybe you can have Shiloh....just don't then blame me :)

Yes...and I have to be honest, I deliberately crossed the three-pointer to stabilizer out after her. Well, after the three-pointers needed to give everyone a bit to get used to it. The stabilizer is f-tsiya more rigid control in their personal external world.

User avatar
Логик
Posts:2073
Joined:Sat Feb 21, 2009 10:43
Has thanked: 2 times
Been thanked: 21 times

Post by Логик » Wed Nov 24, 2010 0:44

Michael_and anchors permanently attached to the object, process, person or you can reassign?

Михаил_
Разработчик
Posts:10765
Joined:Fri Nov 03, 2006 4:29
Been thanked: 906 times

Post by Михаил_ » Wed Nov 24, 2010 0:55

plastic - can. For this you need to use a erasable marker and object eraser to reset the anchor. But better without the need not to do (not remapped). Well, the paper in the case of home-made manufacturing easier to do a new one.... in principle, the same card can be combined and those and those.

верунчик
Posts:166
Joined:Fri Apr 16, 2010 14:08

Post by верунчик » Wed Nov 24, 2010 1:04

Yes, about 4 million - I meant that figuratively.
Do I understand correctly that building a chain of events which tied not one person and not all are tied to the business (so to say "related products"), using the stabilizer to reach a desired result? (business) in the UK is a very long time, then one, then another ...
Or on the stabilizer end we build the desired result and the observed

Sometimes you need that control, that life honey did not seem :)

Михаил_
Разработчик
Posts:10765
Joined:Fri Nov 03, 2006 4:29
Been thanked: 906 times

Post by Михаил_ » Wed Nov 24, 2010 1:31

in this case, the purpose of a stabilizer is not embedded, unless you enter it in the process as one of the anchors (which is valid), then it can be moved... for example there is no option to achieve the goal (not visible paths) - move into heterosexual and observe the emergence of new variants.

Basically, stabiliser is suitable for the informed management of all units and elements somehow involved in the process.
Moreover, every anchored item we do not put a clear statement (although this can be achieved, but it will bend, especially if it is a different person), but only change the external factors, i.e. the field, the energy of the process in which it is located, and his reaction to her.

However, the influence of the stabilizer would be certain. For example some employee ... well, for example steal. Every happens in life. It can of course remove from the map as a whole (physically dismiss), but you can influence it one way or another. For example, to prescribe the harmonization with the law. However, as one of the response options of the world in General, he can get fast-track testing for the stolen, getting in trouble with the law(harmonization might be through the aggravation and not through a change in the person) and not necessarily in the field of the map (somewhere in your personal life).
That is not guaranteed to predict the reaction of the world to introduce a factor with certain accuracy, can work where more weakly or more strongly. Therefore, when the operator sees what is happening good itself, the efficiency with Stabilizer will be higher.

Where necessary, it is necessary to introduce the individual elements of the impact of IC as an independent factor.

In General, the stabilizer in the first place should be a factor cutting away the excess "left" risks arising from increasing due to planetary processes bounce in the big world.

In General Your question is clear - Yes, it is possible, but at points where we need a clear reaction and not indeterminate, we need to exercise great caution and to connect the IC.
In addition, the Stabilizer may be different options for extensions that you can own "add", but take it as a system of rigid positioning. And the very stabilizirovannyi is a kind of rigid positioning pole Homo-principle and a number of other related to the stability of the poles of the world. I.e. this system of "stretch marks-props".<

Михаил_
Разработчик
Posts:10765
Joined:Fri Nov 03, 2006 4:29
Been thanked: 906 times

Post by Михаил_ » Wed Nov 24, 2010 1:32

The simplest application for a homemade version of the stabilization computer, auto technology, in the way of your daily route. Eliminating factors of accidents.

User avatar
Логик
Posts:2073
Joined:Sat Feb 21, 2009 10:43
Has thanked: 2 times
Been thanked: 21 times

Post by Логик » Wed Nov 24, 2010 1:48

Михаил_ wrote:the simplest application for a homemade version of the stabilization computer, auto technology, in the way of your daily route. Eliminating factors of accidents.
And I have a technique and it always works fine. What am I doing wrong? :)
But my mother's computer, naughty, and often. Come to fix - nothing to fix, everything is working. :?

верунчик
Posts:166
Joined:Fri Apr 16, 2010 14:08

Post by верунчик » Wed Nov 24, 2010 1:52

Thank you!
So far, so good :)
Take " N "

Михаил_
Разработчик
Posts:10765
Joined:Fri Nov 03, 2006 4:29
Been thanked: 906 times

Post by Михаил_ » Wed Nov 24, 2010 2:34

There's a question in PM. Decided, with the permission of the questioner to answer here.
Michael, can I ask for stabilizer?
Very vague while I imagine this device, but would like to decide on versions. Just difference still didn't quite catch.
You can spend some analogy with BJ on the difference between versions N and b(or radionically? or else what?)
For what purpose was conceived by you N and for which B. to Switch from N to B then as else possible? Argue what what might be sufficient and N, especially while vedesh, but then you may need it B :roll:
On the other hand, if you do not take into account the scale of the enterprise, then B is justified, or will be obvious overdose.
That feel somewhat chaotically written, but excuse magnanimously. :)
with BJ ... don't know.
Because BJ means of work with themselves and then with the world, and the stabilizer actually does not affect the operator feedback through the observation of the effect of its use.
With radionomy. Well, I suppose that only very slightly N it 2400хд, and B is атг12000
In fact, the analogy does not hold, since in General both versions are identical in operation and functionality to an individual object, such as your computer, which prescribe stabilization, will not care.
Just for the big version, you can install many anchors on a map. And for some, it may be important. Power density is also greater, but it is not aimed at the operator, and stabilized the process.

As for the idea about the device, in fact its use is as versatile as life itself. Ie here is an example with "extra-legal" officer is only one of the possible models.
For example, the simplest algorithm. Firm. Watch the weakest link, for example some Department. Put chaos, which throws out weak, leaves a strong, looking for new solutions based on this, we translate into as lot of energy the chaos subsides, but the weak link becomes strong. Waiting for some effect, point of work on "5+" and drag in the area of stabilization, perhaps with someone from the staff transfer out because they are essentially speakers of other qualities.
In General, these processes are usually carried out directly by physical actions, but if we "prescribe" through the map, our plan will work even if initially the staff were not happy with him.
You can also work with external processes-bonds.
In fact, you can also work with your body, but you need to understand what is and what there qualities too.
And so on.
B version is designed for higher number of spots or more severe tasks, capable to eat power, although in General even N can pull a couple of hundred spots, but they are homemade then either to do or to buy, which is less profitable than to take once more.

By the way each "anchor" this program is like a micro-SC, working with a specific object.

Even homemade stabilizer can handle very heavy tasks.

From the point of view of the operator the difference between the homemade and the commercial version will be visible between B and N - weakly.
So it makes sense in the presence of viable operating conditions under heavy load or with a large number of objects, otherwise - no.


Replace N on the B I think it is not possible to buy then B is also possible, however, they unite as if in one device.
The problem is that I don't know when you are going to resolve org questions with blanks for "B" except for those five that are already there. Our modern world is all so funny. On the one hand so much you can find the right cabinets in large retail chains and small too :) that simplifies things. If I ordered all the items as in the past was done, hand-made.. for example gift boxes SK-carved from precious wood... the number of produced appliances and their price would be...

on the other, in the old days, if we have a supplier, and he is doing his job, holding on to the clientele. And now... all define some terrible volumes average demand.... was product-no product :)
in the old days, if you really were artifacts, they did the long... piece... expensive and then several hundred years some kind of this. And now ...
the list goes on. you have to adjust to the realities of the time.

in General, the presence of B I don't answer, but someday they on sale back. I tend to translate everything into their own independent production. Sooner or later, and these bottoms will do. While there will be 5.
Normal version problems are expected, I stock organized and it will increase.<

Михаил_
Разработчик
Posts:10765
Joined:Fri Nov 03, 2006 4:29
Been thanked: 906 times

Post by Михаил_ » Wed Nov 24, 2010 2:36

Логик wrote:
Михаил_ wrote:the simplest application for a homemade version of the stabilization computer, auto technology, in the way of your daily route. Eliminating factors of accidents.
And I have a technique and it always works fine. What am I doing wrong? :)
But my mother's computer, naughty, and often. Come to fix - nothing to fix, everything is working. :?
this is a good example of the simplest and one of the main possible applications. To have your mother's computer without You worked, it is possible to anchor.

User avatar
Маг.нет
Posts:3310
Joined:Fri Apr 16, 2010 12:48
Has thanked: 24 times
Been thanked: 142 times

Post by Маг.нет » Wed Nov 24, 2010 17:33

Михаил_ wrote:On what stabilizer to reserve?
"N" tomorrow, you pay. Expect together with the Amplifier.


Sincerely, MAG.no

User avatar
Воффка
Posts:776
Joined:Mon May 31, 2010 17:06
Has thanked: 5 times
Been thanked: 8 times

Post by Воффка » Mon Nov 29, 2010 21:09

Michael_
Hello, Michael! You said that in СК1М link 2.6 is filled, and if there to pour the link from 2.6+ (huge, wooden, handmade) will there be significant changes?

Михаил_
Разработчик
Posts:10765
Joined:Fri Nov 03, 2006 4:29
Been thanked: 906 times

Post by Михаил_ » Tue Nov 30, 2010 1:59

1. not ск1м and исн1.
2. no, there are no strings attached.

User avatar
Малика
Posts:681
Joined:Fri Jan 08, 2010 19:11
Has thanked: 251 times
Been thanked: 110 times

Post by Малика » Tue Nov 30, 2010 16:26

Michael, is it possible to hold devices with the tasks in a closet or in the drawers , I would not want people to see them, much less ask what it is.

User avatar
Воффка
Posts:776
Joined:Mon May 31, 2010 17:06
Has thanked: 5 times
Been thanked: 8 times

Post by Воффка » Fri Dec 10, 2010 18:00

Michael_
Hello, Michael! Tell me whether you СК1М HF at sub-zero temperatures to make? At -30 for example. How will this affect their work?

м-р Фримэн
Posts:77
Joined:Thu Sep 30, 2010 22:37

Post by м-р Фримэн » Fri Dec 10, 2010 19:07

Michael, I have long wanted to ask, but all that was forgotten is not no secret that in the "Psychotronics" constantly bend the world. :) One was even involved, a critical mass of devices, from which the air is so electric that already rang, almost on a physical level, and the staff are always friendly was extremely irritable and aggressive. :evil: :wiz More of this, I have not watched, apparently not at risk.... But it's all with regards to Radionics I do not know where they is bound to the operator (owner), and so, repeatedly observed the same picture and СК1м lay paper on the subject table, and at my last visit and even HF set and it's not a showpiece specifically asked. The question of the purity of the device and the sacred act in his relation to the owner. If the device uses other people for their own goals and objectives that, therefore, the device attached to him, and he becomes his master and as stated in the description of the binding is stiff and it does not get stolen without the consent of the master, and that in this case is obtained with device when buying who he works for?

Михаил_
Разработчик
Posts:10765
Joined:Fri Nov 03, 2006 4:29
Been thanked: 906 times

Post by Михаил_ » Fri Dec 10, 2010 22:27

Воффка wrote:Michael_
Hello, Michael! Tell me whether you СК1М HF at sub-zero temperatures to make? At -30 for example. How will this affect their work?
contraindications not see any. Will have no effect.

Михаил_
Разработчик
Posts:10765
Joined:Fri Nov 03, 2006 4:29
Been thanked: 906 times

Post by Михаил_ » Fri Dec 10, 2010 22:52

м-р Фримэн wrote:Michael, I have long wanted to ask, but all that was forgotten is not no secret that in the "Psychotronics" constantly bend the world. :)
The secret for me, You opened my eyes :) the world :)
One was even involved, a critical mass of devices, from which the air is so electric that already rang, almost on a physical level, and the staff are always friendly was extremely irritable and aggressive. :evil: :wiz
Just please understand that even good people are awkward days when they are not funny. A further effect of a frontal collision of opinions of strong personalities. That's the whole "singing live". The difference compared to "normal" any other office, just in the fact that everything looks quite as real people, and in the usual average office... not quite. In addition, all days of the year are totally different, including geomagnitnoi calendar component and natural energy cycles. In some places it is seen more if there to the soil.
More of this, I have not watched, apparently not at risk....
Why not risk it? how many people can afford coming any. Just as loved was my friend, "even though the saints" :)
But it's all with regards to Radionics I do not know where they is bound to the operator (owner), and so, repeatedly observed the same picture and СК1м lay paper on the subject table, and at my last visit and even HF set and it's not a showpiece specifically asked.
I'm sorry, but this is all - full, so to speak, garbage. The office used Radionics SK and HF boxes. It does not argue very well that this is happening. And there is no jangling of ether, Gnote world or disharmony. I have not so rarely. The office as a office, more a parlor car impact slightly on the overall atmosphere - Yes. I.e. they are affected in a certain way not unusual for the atmosphere in the room, but it's hard enough to feel, need a fulcrum that was with what to compare. This influence of the parlor is connected with some of their critical mass (well, a lot of them stored there and indeed a lot of things....).
As far as I know radionica often do stand the test client, and much more. But I would not say that this is a strong effect. Well, the impact of as exposure.... there are much more powerful.
To show you what to bend the world? or better not? :)
Not felt it as a serious "impact", a lot depends on the operator goals and the weight factors. Just the appliance and the piece of paper in itself does not create any serious change. Changes occur where the factors are mutually combined.
About the position of the goal in the UK, and on HF I was asked, I confirmed that it is technically possible in principle.

The question of the purity of the device and the sacred act in his relation to the owner. If the device uses other people for their own goals and objectives that, therefore, the device attached to him, and he becomes his master and as stated in the description of the binding is stiff and it does not get stolen without the consent of the master, and that in this case is obtained with device when buying who he works for?
There is no sacred act. There is a clearly defined algorithm. And it works correctly. Owners of the device can be a lot at a time. The device is configured on the master just at the time of acquisition of the owner when the uncertainty is definitely becoming someone. For example it boxed up to send. Or paid in full and he's the only (OK), and so on. Wrote here about the fact of work since the adoption of the decision on purchase.
Up to this point all devices are in some way the "office". They can demonstrate (there is no special demo copies, and do not see reasons) and Yes, sometimes included on them some goals.
For the definitive host is in fact even plus - this device will work more powerful, as there was a buildup, not just lying on a shelf.
By the way, I sometimes use SK-semi-finished products (in the formulation "to choose all available, give the task", the resulting devices typically stronger than usual). This is correct because before sending them to the office, in a way, I'm the owner.
Final host can also be changed if you give me the device does not temporarily, but permanently.
Trace of use on the device does not remain...

as for Gnote the world, the most powerful artifact in the office for Gnote world - ek<

м-р Фримэн
Posts:77
Joined:Thu Sep 30, 2010 22:37

Post by м-р Фримэн » Sat Dec 11, 2010 4:41

Michael, sorry that might hurt You unconsciously, but my question was only СК1м, or rather, the legality of its dorodango use, just in the background of this first binding (attunement) recommended in the manual, the fact that the device is used by someone before selling them, a little confused. Without this item, the description would not have delivered value, well, lie to yourself paper and lay one of the bonuses for employees, free use any device. So I forgot to ask this question, until he became the owner of this wonderful device. But if You say that it's harmless, and even useful, the question is removed, reassured... :)
And about bending the world, I guess I should have put quotes around "bending world", "sacred act" in comic form, so to speak, for a more vivid perception. :) Somehow, even with the demos made a joke on this subject: "What", they said, "All the world oppression?", – "Bend," answered Dimas.... :) By the way, about "singing live": in that day, they really worked a lot of Radionics, ranging from the very simple to the most powerful. There was a feeling that they'll turn all that was available, the number of simultaneously working devices, I have not seen. And they had some nerve, even slightly rude, which was not observed before, however, quickly stopped, but the residue remained, to his wife uncomfortable, we her the bracelet chose. So I suggested a version with a large number of working devices, other explanation at that time was not. But it's not about that, and about СК1м You said, the question is removed, thanks very much. :)
Михаил_ wrote:wrote Here about the fact of work since the adoption of the decision on purchase.
I think it was I... :oops:
Михаил_ wrote:as for Gnote the world, the most powerful artifact in the office for Gnote world - ek
Well, it's premature to start IC and 2.5 to learn how to, and then in EK can... :)<

Михаил_
Разработчик
Posts:10765
Joined:Fri Nov 03, 2006 4:29
Been thanked: 906 times

Post by Михаил_ » Sat Dec 11, 2010 6:54

well, it was when I was there атг12000 and a couple рад5 -nothing unusual office was not remarkable... the rest of the time simply physically there are not so many of the older versions, because some of them is under the order.
Like I said, it all depends on the operator and the target. If someone powerful itch something serious and strong,without any instruments, this will.... and how many do not take the instruments - the scales are commensurate with the goal. And that is usually put in the office, as I understand it, is part of srednemirovyh task, they "wave" around, do not raise.
When something is really riding the wave, it looks more than strange, while not nervous around people, and everything that happens is far beyond the ordinary, though that's a whole other reality or unreality of some kind :)

As for the question, the authorization for the owner on all products is virtually the same and I'm very happy with them. With the same IC, when I was the story, of the issuance of the instrument "on the house", a certain person at a certain time. The effect on this person turned off when the device got back to the office (and started other effects are immediately visible). It is significant in particular, from the point of view of authorization. Ie is not only theoretical but also checked multiple practice data.
Of course, if something was wrong, I would have gave this instruction. But in my opinion to make products requiring abs. sterility to buyer at least recklessly, you never know what happens....

As for EK, then there can not in the operator order (really useful for consciousness in particular, quickly other processes go to start, including any development of 2.5 and so on). I mean, I understand those who have no territorial opportunities... and who has - is today the most effective way of a training of consciousness that I know of. Conditions are not only specific to mental practices, but also run the processes that are outside of ek to stimulate difficult and a dozen BJ, consciousness begins to come alive as a single system, not pieces..... and then it remembers itself, and does not want to completely cut off in the emergency mode, in which most people live.<

м-р Фримэн
Posts:77
Joined:Thu Sep 30, 2010 22:37

Post by м-р Фримэн » Sat Dec 11, 2010 17:12

Михаил_ wrote:But in my opinion to make products requiring abs. sterility to buyer at least recklessly, you never know what happens....
Well, if the author of technology thinks so, then the question can not be! :) Just succumbed to slightly of a certain hysteria about binding and purity, which in this and folding the branch was raised. Unfortunately, not all of them have that sensitivity, as for example, a respected MAG.no in which all instruments have a voice, sing and communicate with him. And like I seals in sensitivity until you hear should be a device that could possibly go wrong, and suddenly not in the mood, and suddenly the enemies get stolen, etc. Someone even wanted their genetic materials in the UK to introduce a tight binding :)

About EK need to think about You intrigued me.... That's just a little scary, the roof suddenly go from sharp contrast, and the revival of consciousness? Any side effects observed?

Михаил_
Разработчик
Posts:10765
Joined:Fri Nov 03, 2006 4:29
Been thanked: 906 times

Post by Михаил_ » Sat Dec 11, 2010 18:21

1. ek - soft impact stuff, no one roof is not yet driving.
2. the effects described in the thread theme. The people had certain images in ek or after (during sleep for example), presumably associated with reincarnation or glitches on their account (sure you can never, even if the person doesn't believe in it, when raising the amount of memory start to go the resonances which are hung photos of the Fidler video library, but often people see something never seen.
but these special.effects are rare (relatively). Ie from the same Kaznacheeva in hypomagnetic chamber, or the mirror Kozyrev, they are statistically observed in very high numbers observed (don't remember the details, well 80-90%), but over a long period of observations and many possible a single. Ie on the one hand the effect is stable, but is not immediately and perhaps a hundred sessions. That is to say, the scariest thing there is - a cartoon about something unusual with a high degree of realism, the appearance of which with the first time should not count :)
For the rest, probably just a deep relaxation.
Effects are cumulative in nature and related to the overall regenerative processes in the cocoon by placing the body in neobychnye special conditions.

м-р Фримэн
Posts:77
Joined:Thu Sep 30, 2010 22:37

Post by м-р Фримэн » Sat Dec 11, 2010 18:28

Yes, you have to venture out and try.... The main thing that would have time out, if that... :)
There is a sense in one session or need to pass some course?

Михаил_
Разработчик
Posts:10765
Joined:Fri Nov 03, 2006 4:29
Been thanked: 906 times

Post by Михаил_ » Sat Dec 11, 2010 18:48

Yes no there if anything at all is observeration tool for the masses of users, limitations on usage whatsoever. Ie there to decide there is nothing. Just some people (actually everyone, but the time of appearance varies, depending on the initial state) gets a nice additional effects.
The best course of 7-10 times. one or two times a week, but once I will a lot of useful experience.

м-р Фримэн
Posts:77
Joined:Thu Sep 30, 2010 22:37

Post by м-р Фримэн » Sat Dec 11, 2010 18:55

Well, persuaded, I will try!:D
The description says that the first sessions are recommended with listening Patrushev Star Voyager and Healing, and the Conductor can be? And these disks and the player need to bring or Psychotronics, all you need to give?

Locked