Audio for IC.

[Маг.нет]

for Example, (I think) run No. 1 (focus on man in direct contact), (I think) run "demo_nastroy" will be webcast on the person, the receiver is desirable in this scheme?

it is good to enhance the density of the translation impact on the bearing receiver,

the receiver of the above conditions is at a small distance from the object, denoted for example arm's length.


Sincerely, MAG.no

[Михаил_]

Well, it's some intermediate version. The effect of it will, but weaker than in the pocket for example.

[Маг.нет]

Michael_, a list, in the table "object coordinates" + mental reference to the Owner of SK as a second list object.
Translates to one of 3 tracks:
sk1kapsula.mp3
sk1operatorenergy.mp3
sk1operatorprotect.mp3

Efficiency, distribution/the distribution of the effect, the feasibility of using the distribution of the Timer (example for 5 minutes alternately on each object in a loop).


Sincerely, MAG.no

[Михаил_]

Easier to test than to ask I don't know the exact answer depends on the different mating conditions.
generally, if it (the list) should be broadcast to a list of recipients, it is best to put several SC otherwise it will still be some intermittent effects.
Audio operator's name in the beginning intended for broadcast on a permanent or temporary operator of the device.
Ie it would be more accurate as an indication of a temporary (time trail. track) shift operator, next track, specify the track.

[Маг.нет]

Thank you! Clear. You can (should) agree...
Another question, when casting a capsule on "coordinates" TO functioning around the designated object?

Sincerely, MAG.no

[Михаил_]

Yes, of course... well partially, not all of SK is dragged there.

[Маг.нет]

The principles and effectiveness.
Two SC at the same time, one "capsule" on the other - "operatorpanel", the Target one - Owner SK.


Sincerely, MAG.no

[Михаил_]

so it will be effective.
Two SK will work in symbiosis, but each will do their job.

[Михаил_]

I have a request to those who have SK and Radionics, assessment to compare the treatment of water (I just wonder), ACC. in the UK audio will be two versions of neutral (not situations) water, and radionicu just structuring the flow from the tube.
Interested in like-not like (the idea with the track living water must be a certain similarity, although it was made on a different principle) and other nuances of personal perception.
Ask to understand how and where to extend your audio system.

[Логик]

Michael,
you can create an audio track for СК1м type 1 track charge used.well. 1.0, for cleaning items from the stagnant and negative Energetiki?

[Михаил_]

use the finished track from БЖ1.0, it can be used as a universal eraser.

[Воффка]

Michael_
Hello Michael!
Tell me the correct diagram?

A track sk1fixtarget.mp3 and while it plays I think about the ultimate goal.

A track sk1fixway.mp3 and yet he plays with words and/or mentally recite it the way I'd like to see this goal realized.

A track sk1hfuture.mp3 while it plays with words and/or mentally speak to it powered most advantageous for my scenario.

Is there a mismatch between the first and second paragraph? Whether you need to increase the efficiency of any points to add/remove and so everything is optimal?

[Михаил_]

item 2 can be removed, unless there is clear assurance that this is the right route to the goal. All these tracks allow more rigid control of the device, like switching to manual control gives a bit other opportunities. To record the realized preferably in that case, if You can discern the least about the existence of several variants of realization in your perception and want some swing. Or for "insurance" that is not implemented is not the way to go (but maybe some do...)

[Воффка]

Michael_
But if when playing sk1fixtarget.mp3 ask to simply clear wording, he will literally understand the words or all thought, steaming in the head, too, will have a major impact?

[Петр Петрович]

On the stage put photos or a unique identifier of a person. For example, I write email and name, putting on someone

Came up with the idea: photos, nicknames, e-mail... - anyway, but they can be the same for different people 99 percent. It is best to identify suitable fingerprints/finger - if you believe the forensics, this is the ID unique on 100 %, to the same - unchanged throughout life.
What are your opinions?

[Маг.нет]

fingerprints/finger - if you believe the forensics, this is the ID unique on 100 %

Slightly, but less than 100%... a Photo of a man is not always 100%, let me explain, if no mental reference, then photography can be a lot of owners, depicts a man, photographer, the owner of the camera, etc. So, my opinion, better more than one non-unique identifier for identification of direction, or mental binding (I know, it's the fact).


Sincerely, MAG.no

[Петр Петрович]

MAG.no! I meant here that: 1. Photo may not be a unique identifier because: 1)pictures, for example, twins may be identical; 2)photos taken long time have a relatively weak relationship than has been the case recently (the idea from the thread about Radionics). 2. Niki and the more names - the same picture is observed: in the passport of gridania the Russian Federation there is the column "a Personal code" to exclude the possibility of one Pyotr Petrovich to impersonate another...; 3)about the nicknames (nicknames, nickname, etc.) - every yard has at least one Thick, Long, or any other; 4) e-mail address: You faced, probably, with a choice of addresses. One that like is already taken. We have to contrive to enter additional numbers or other marks; 5)a hair, drop of blood etc. - it's just not hygienic.
Therefore, the option with the "fingers" - the most, in my opinion, the best

[Михаил_]

Email absolutely unique, even by entering tsiferok.
But as a nickname for a specific forum, such as was the Magician.no or Peter here is exactly the thing each. So it is quite precise and unambiguous instructions.
You can write the email ID in Skype, nickname on the forum (along with the name thereof), and the name on the passport - very clear connection. Mark - I think so too.

[Маг.нет]

Email absolutely unique, even by entering tsiferok.
But as a nickname for a specific forum, such as was the Magician.no or Peter here is exactly the thing each. So it is quite precise and unambiguous instructions.

Do NOT agree, You do point to TWO conditions - NICAM and a specific forum. The same nikam on another forum may belong to a different person.
And with e-mail too, not just... You know... Mental binding more efficient. "Michael_", + one That...

1)photo, for example twins can be identical;

The way, even similar, has a uniqueness defined look.


Sincerely, MAG.no

[Михаил_]

I reply in this thread to questions about the UK and I do not care You agree or not
nickname on the forum such as:
Маг.нет_на_форум_mindmachine.ru quite a unique string that only in ONE way will be defined by the device.
By and large SK deeply spit with a high steeple is not some "structural connection". It computes a destination (for example on the label) and works with it without using the link and installing it.

[Воффка]

Michael_
Above I asked about the objectives for the IC, please see

[Михаил_]

The device has a function of specifying the settings.
That is, this indicating the links with the order, he will try to understand what You meant. In the case of a link by mail or nick - there is quite clearly meant a particular person with a completely unambiguous identification. In the case of specifying the target about the audio, too, may be clearly read your thoughts and words (which are also thought - communication with the image library). Influence and that and that. To build a perfect protection from stray Intrusive thoughts in the cavern of consciousness is impossible, so of course it is important that this spinning in my head.
The device does not understand the word because... he perceives the information as the information - the word is YOUR understanding of the meaning of the word. The same phrase from two different people can have almost opposite meaning.

[Воффка]

Michael_
Thank you! Clearly explained! I indefikatsii use for your hair and for some reason I think that this is enough for even a pretty hard link, and if you work with another person, then thinking about it to look at any of the drying trail from a fat marker on the paper or am I wrong?
I'm a little do not understand why it has evolved the discussion about the binding? You told enough about 20 minutes it just in the hands hold and say:"I am your master" and all, he is very well attached and even no hairs, e-mail addresses, nicknames, not to put on it. So is it with the nicknames and email people for complacency is making or is not enough simply to hand hold for good bindings?

P. S. Someone was trying to remember him of his blood to pour and almost to implant it in your brain for more to say so procanico of privatsky

[Новик]

Voffka
This someone I.... And there is nothing to juggle, I just wanted him inside politi the photo with the hair and drop of blood...
Or anything superfluous that will not see.
In principle it only did this "explosive composition" filled with glue and put the casting on the table SK kada want to hard privezat it to yourself...
PS.
About to implant in the brain, this is your Fantasie, can you try and fit

[Маг.нет]

nickname on the forum such as:
Маг.нет_на_форум_mindmachine.ru quite a unique string that only in ONE way will be defined by the device.

Michael_, I'm not arguing, but I specify a second condition is always to identify. Let me explain,
when You know the person really (seen, heard or touched him, and the smell, etc.) it is the second condition (the PRINT IMAGE) to identify a photo (audio, etc.) "that man". When You are the person "PERSONALLY, I don'T KNOW", you need the second condition, well, as in the above example. That's what I had in mind for You this is elementary, but many are not clear as what some piece of paper with the words or the idea can point to a SPECIFIC PERSON.


Sincerely, MAG.no