Tranlate - remote virtual artifact(test dir)

[ВладиМа]

Think I'll pass from Panacea rather than three-pointers in favor of Stabilizer or Y4, feel consistently good, except for that three times already hit nose - hee, hee - very funny, but it's probably a small bounce, but in fact with each passing day increases in energy, becoming more managed, watching as well as other changes of a personal nature, dreams, very colorful, different and sometimes not very pleasing, remember not all of them, Havo not been, the last few days in the morning longer than usual sleep, now as cheerful and comfortable. Yes videka was much better to work and still have a number of interesting changes, but do watch.
Mike , thank you for the opportunity to receive such a wonderful experience!

[АКВО]

Hard to give up 3.1 and broadcast spectrum, but the experiment is the experiment

3.1 the stabilizer
the range for Y4

[С. Альбатрос]

Yes, to give hard but what to do? Change 3.1. on the Stabilizer

[Евген412]

I'm willing to try instead of 2.7 Stabilizer

[Галкина]

Oh, choosing is hard when you just want Changing the Panacea to the Stabilizer and 3.1. on Y4 (when ready).

[Кона]

Michael, when replacing U4 on the Stabilizer - how to manage it? Apparently, you have a simple printout of the sectors to make a mental picture not to keep? And not to forget where the anchor is also a simple physical predmerice to put I La anchor?

[Петрос]

Michael, when replacing U4 on the Stabilizer - how to manage it? Apparently, you have a simple printout of the sectors to make a mental picture not to keep? And not to forget where the anchor is also a simple physical predmerice to put I La anchor?

I'm one of their homemade stabilizers intends to allocate.

[ведьмочка]

can I instead of OZ stabilizer?

[Михаил_]

OK. Today will include stabilizers and possibly V4. In this regard, temporarily will not include an update to the actual algorithm the broadcast, but it all messed up in the sensations.
Stabilizers I interesting in your response because its silly to be leveled.

[СтАвР]

I somehow forgot???

well, there is the modulator, which as I understand it in this form will not be implemented
and the whole range of SOC, but probably not very important, there everything is quite compact and a lot of cards

but SK is the one that TC3?
I wonder how much replacement 2.7 current at V4, I'm not experienced with it, here U1 represent
although a second, you showed kernel V4 want, want, want

there is still RF console

[димыч]

how much stabilizer, Y4 or ИСН3 will take up slots on the compiler?

[Михаил_]

Well, SK - of course the thickest (SK4 call) because it is still under the stream a few alterations.
Modulator we here semouleries.... in a sense, is preparing to release new technologies of production, but a few months of trouble - participants of the process to measure busy with their own Affairs.
All the social extension, and so on - will sooner or later be implemented. I think some things in bulk.
Ie in one thread several social. extensions.
But I'm not in a hurry to do it.... but the reaction of people to the devices it is interesting to look at

[Михаил_]

how much stabilizer, Y4 or ИСН3 will take up slots on the compiler?

one I think
another funny thing is that V4 does not take a slot due to its features (it works almost as well as the stream.)

[СтАвР]

I had a question SK3
well, with W1 all clear, but with 3M, 4m or rather, as I understand it is integrated with 3.0 PC and it is already as if not here, relatively
unlock the secrets of the scope, at least superficially, and there I think, I have certain guesses

-----------------------------
Yes and with it I think it will be impossible, or rather very carefully

actually the question is removed, I feel it will be fun

[Михаил_]

no, in General, all SK are built on the scheme of correction of areas of interaction the operator-the world from direct roughness, preventing the trends of the operator. The algorithm is always the same. Just in TC3 added Sakiu the nuances associated with its more recent origin and the availability of new goods and added stricter management principles in relation to the larger variability of the world.
Well, for broadcast, all products still have to redo, except for the last one. Ie 2.2, I already once did in a generic form (for example).

PC here most given that new products are integrated with each other bilaterally. And a PC operator in new insurance taken into account.
The fact of alteration (rewriting) articles for translation usually leads to some improvements or just a more modern adjustments that better reconcile it with the current state of product line and with the realities of the world. All old items does not lose its relevance and in my opinion work just as well and better than before (better because the malleability of the world has increased).

[Ярый]

And if now is only 3 items and have free slots, you still need to change something on the Stabilizer, or you can simply add it to the list?

[СтАвР]

that's actually why the question disappeared
only had to remember the math part

well, or

Fundamental differences from W1 = W2 differences (described earlier) + complete integration with system PC.
Own differences from CK2 = projection methods, their usual PC (see more detailed description of the PC), method of operation "buffer zone", significantly reduced compared with CK2 size, but significantly increased power (comparison = a dozen CK2).
In fact, if a PC is a programmable wearable or mounted stationary unit with 2 fundamental differences from, for example, holographic stickers panacea, the SK3 is the adapter between your PC and the outside world in which he lives and is the operator, while ск1м works locally between that world and this world, but from the operator's position (the interaction zone).
Thus, SK3, Stabilizer and 3.0 (or 3.0 + 3.1, but not in OZ) that form a triangle or Trinity of possible projections of interaction between the operator and the worlds, external and internal to the operator. A PC is a universal interface module suitable for use in all of these modes and able to absorb the rigidity of the structures of those worlds, you are working at the expense of efficiency of software algorithms.
SK3 is a different plane of interaction than ск1м, but the same principle of correction implemented, as in the case of CK2 more tightly (the calculation for professional operator is able to simultaneously carry more responsibility and better ossanna to manage their goals.)

[Михаил_]

And if now is only 3 items and have free slots, you still need to change something on the Stabilizer, or you can simply add it to the list?

obviously you can just add

[димыч]

well, if such a holiday - Michael, please add Y4, ИСН3 in a free slot, and colorful dreams replace SK or Stop magic all reinforced

[Ярый]

And if now is only 3 items and have free slots, you still need to change something on the Stabilizer, or you can simply add it to the list?

obviously you can just add

Well then I Stab and ИСН3 in the collection, and Y4, if he's slot is not needed!

[Евген412]

I then, too, if you Y4

[Ярый]

By the way, Michael, and ИСН3 and Y4, as I understand it, similar in their impact? Or am I mistaken? Does it make sense to run them concurrently?

[Магистр]

Choose the Stabilizer is 3.1. Let Y4 be, if it does not need a slot

[Галкина]

Michael, if by the slot V4 is not needed, then instead of 3.1. - SK, is a Panacea Stabilizer?

[Михаил_]

Oh how everyone here povybirat shorter stabilizers will later today.
Stabilizers will be in two capacities. The basis (=1слот) - it is today.
Then there will be stabilizer reinforced (+1 slot).
Amplifiers (Y4) today to connect won't so as not to create confusion.
IIM, SK, etc. will be later (next few days)
Stoppage will also be combined with the card "Alcatel" proven extremely cool even in pretty tough situations.
It seems for now. Changes, as always will be back later with Nocera.