BJ 2.1 / 2.2 / 2.4

[Смелый]

Maybe slightly off topic. 26 Dec rings (sorry, but again clairvoyant Mikhaylovna, with her we live in the same town and the same house, but I'm not at home) and asked when I could come home. I live on the top floor, her son lives on the first floor beneath me. Cold, just warm the batteries, you need the air in my batteries down.
Tomorrow they say.
Said and thought.
Would be a call from other neighbors wouldn't have to think.
And then Weiss. Probably looked where the problem is because called.
I remembered that about a month ago, I made a generator Andrew S. the matrix a Panacea for a house with four sides and gave the program, what would the temperature in the apartments was in the region of 22 degrees Celsius.
But. I didn't want to go to the New Year back home, knew that cold in the apartment (although programmed otherwise) and tried to dissuade my wife from a trip argument cold in the apartment.
I thought, what if I mentally kept cold in the apartment. Mentally shook his finger at his temple, but decided to work on the mental distance.
Mentally approached the battery in the kitchen, and began to twist the drain valve......., distinctly heard cotton. Like a cork out of the bottle produces.
Didn't believe himself.
Mentally to another baterie, tap, twist, cotton.
You may not believe me, but it was. Claps very clearly heard, but the sound is not clear.
And so, all four of the room. And four of cotton.
Do I have to guess that coming home yesterday, I found hot battery, in which the hand is not long and 13 degrees on the thermometer by the front door. Which means that the batteries are intensely warm started not so long ago, in the evening or at night.
What more confirmation of the power of thought is needed and what other doubts need for permanent warnings of Michael on the topic of personal responsibility of the operator?

[Хастред]

that is not true of 2.1 bracelets made by the stream roller

what kind of video is this that makes 2.1? I was just about panacea read with video

[Маг.нет]

[youtube][/youtube]
On file sharing: 2.1.mp4

Copier depends on the properties of consciousness over-anomality a large area. More than a few thousand I haven't tried yet. But do not depend in any way from PixelNet.
Therefore, there is a large loss of energy in any person, regardless of the whims of his mind.

In this case, (time counter) do not understand what You mean by "pixelratio". In my perception, "PixelNet" including directly connected with the parameter of the energy potential of consciousness, the more "points" in the minds (density, in addition to capacity), the greater its ability to hold and dispose of mental energy, i.e. consciousness with a low density of "how much energy does not fill" (limited capacity) to resist and be used in a "device" is extremely small, i.e. under the same capacity is more dense consciousness when filling has a proportionally greater energy potential and has the ability to simultaneously "describe" a larger number of "points" of the multidimensional structures in time (reflected in parameter threading), which is also used in the "challenge" of resonances in the Object by consciousness or broadcast structures "resonance virus".
Well of course if they were just "miraculously", but there are the mechanics of the process.......


Sincerely, MAG.no 〠

[Хастред]

In the games: 2.1.mp4

thank you.
and who will be engaged in the relief to those bracelets which are made through video? if there is a Ko?
or please give a link to the topic where they discussed the creation of such 2.1 I don't have fruit questions that have already answered there

[Андрей С.]

Video 2.1 and overlay are two different mechanisms.

In principle - no.

quality (appearance) of the charge will depend on the communication channel between them (even a link) that will be able to create Your consciousness

Either.

[Маг.нет]

Wow today is fundamental.......

[Андрей С.]

And what, in your opinion, is the fundamental difference? There are differences, Yes, in one case the impact is directly on the object (the bracelet on the monitor), in the other case, through the link (photo; by the way, you can play the video and BioLink - blood, hair, etc.), so what, this is a fundamentally different mechanism? You say that in the case of overlapping computer does not interact directly with the World, and in the case of video playback, it turns out, interacts?) Windows Media Player is fundamentally different from Photoshop or php script?

On the second point, Michael has all argued.

upd.

What is double resonance is not understood.

As I understand it, the first resonance with the "source BJ", the second resonance between the photo and the man.

[Маг.нет]

In case live video is working out the underlying charging system (it is made for this and carries all the required quality), the program which for the most part bypasses the consciousness of the Operator and the "channel of interaction" between the multidimensional structure 2.1 and the Object is created the properties of this charging system and the computer (or rather the player) only a small external mechanism of change which changes nothing, he has the interim job, he works at the expense of their resources.
Pictures of the screenshot of the video shortcuts to charging the system (resonances) they are connected, but at a slightly less "points" (in the same "dynamics" of the video is also part of information) that are imposed not on the Object itself, but the link to the Object that the link was working between the photo and the subject should be "channel" (or points of interaction, resonance - call it what you will) that software is not written in the charging system, and is implemented through the consciousness of the Operator. Try to impose a charging system for people who don't know and don't know who might know (there are no established channels - can't tell the World where exactly broadcast resonance), and photos for example I took the Internet, and then read from another photo of the same man what happened. According to my observations (superimposed on a photo virtual "little" friend, and read in the direct contact after a short time), a small weak track for a while there (most likely formed only by my mind, or rather his "expectations"), but not compared to the capacity charge which is obtained via the well-established "channels", and very significant. This also applies to 1 and 2 points.


Sincerely, MAG.no 〠

[Михаил_]

at the double-resonance - correctly (from Andrew S.), two resonance create a challenge, then the mechanism works more or less independently of the operator.
In the case of industrial production - there are a number of technical and other bells and whistles on this process.
In the case of direct broadcast video - one step to regard less the consciousness of the operator is used as a switch which determines that charging is not a piece of paper with a photo or there is a disk on which it is stored and the source object displayed in the photo. In this connection it may be some artifacts he was involved in the process(towards better or worse), but if it is deleted, everything will be fine and perhaps even better.
By the way no one had thought to play in this aspect, the parameter vremeni ?

As for the "pixelpost" that I'm talking about the possibility of consciousness to hold complex structures and apply them - it's not affected, and the energy important in this aspect in which he almost every work, well unless the person is in a semiconscious and diseased state.
The mechanism is the same - it is a separate song, especially in the older versions.
But there is a part of the operator is eliminated, in the ordinary process (not the overlay on the photo) place the operator's intervention is actually there, although of course, I can do it hands in the form of exceptions.

[С. Альбатрос]

I once went on spring handmades the exhibition, liked it very much the work of one Potter, well, very warm his dishes were. I decided to copy his products BJ module, copier, and all products he ever did or will do, that is not now they are BJ, and they had already become a BJ in the manufacturing process. Don't know what happened in the end, but he covered me, then, very specifically, for a couple of days

[Маг.нет]

at the double-resonance - correctly (from Andrew S.), two resonance create a challenge, then the mechanism works more or less independently of the operator.

As for the "pixelpost" that I'm talking about the possibility of consciousness to hold complex structures and apply them - it's not affected, and the energy important in this aspect in which he almost every work, well unless the person is in a semiconscious and diseased state.

But there is a part of the operator is eliminated, in the ordinary process (not the overlay on the photo) place the operator's intervention is actually there, although of course, I can do it hands in the form of exceptions.

Between the photo and the Object I observed, the existing relationship is very weakly manifested (or you can say that resonance is a very small amount of "points", can be confused with other resonances of this photo) to this "channel" to interact with or even just "reaching out" to denote the reference to "Object Name" - structural component, is the minimum required to show this resonance (to establish a "channel") - the work of consciousness of the Operator, by default, the pictures there are lots of direct resonances with other Objects alive: the photographer, the audience left their mark, for example emotional nature, others of which sees the photographer in the moment of shooting, the people that the photographer could think of at the moment of shooting, inanimate objects: parts of clothing, environment, space, media, photo, virtual, etc. all will not provide. The ability to create remote connections (at least in order to accurately indicate the charging Facility) depends on the potential of consciousness is manifesting resonance, the ability to focus so as not to catch his "pointer" and other Objects (to reduce cost) - the ability of the Operator to associate these "two resonance" in one process - the task of the consciousness of the Operator (process computer overlay simplifies the creation of this abstraction and helps to maintain the charging process in the required time outside the Operator's attention). What is implemented offline, and that is directly dependent on the capabilities and potential of the Operator, although the "how to" in any case is implemented (cited above is an example from my experience).

Well, Yes, "mnogopikselnoy" - the ability of the mind to keep more complex structures, including abstraction, parallel, multi-level processes, but also directly affects the energy potential of the individual (this is not a consequence and cause), as is reflected in the density of connections (resonances larger number of "points"), the manifestation and the Power of mental (multithreading including). With regard to energy potential mental most active there are very few, even the sick and semiconscious))))))), set, for example, they seriously "think" and pass out in minutes if you concentrate. By the way read in this forum how it solves the problem of seal mental, especially if you can connect to the U2-U3, i.e. the energy+information, well, it's just a word.......

Ie based on the last paragraph of Your message can be understood that when applied to photo Operator is still present?


Sincerely, MAG.no 〠<

[Андрей С.]

As I understand it, the role of consciousness imposing here only to highlight the resonance point to the object (which is not even mandatory). The power and purity of the resonance of consciousness does not depend on. This is resonance, not the channel. This rough analogy: take a guitar and play a chord. You can highlight the consciousness of the individual sound of each string, but can't change, strengthen or weaken. The photo is a "chord".

[Маг.нет]

one battle on the strings or the chord is difficult to accurately determine the tune....... you can mix up.
what boltologiya do, it is always possible to test practically and to compare the result.
besides, at the same time find out what is the photo channel, and what determines the strength and purity of resonance.
but in the same way as strengthen/weaken resonances (channel) to find resonances of Objects in the photographs.
at the same time see what affects another awakening resonances with BJ at the Target and as it is fixed.
and parallel to what is "allocate response" to point out the Object to focus, to separate similar.
to know what close friends differ from strangers to acquaintances through a friend, through personal contact.

[Вячеслав.]

...Wow,what a concentration of thought,already the sparks are flying,it is very useful IMHO sometimes these disputes,then you can just walk and pick up gems to...happy New Year and all the best!!!

[Маг.нет]

The main thing that good.......
A detailed study of the question makes it impossible to find your own path to effective solutions.
Sometimes we can restrict capacious phrase "everyone is different", you can try to understand it?
Each evaluates the task level of its possibilities, sometimes omitting the details: "it's simple".
But for someone to these possibilities still need to go on and on, checking and double-checking the postulates.......
Although often we tend to idealize themselves and others, the overestimation of the limiting.


Sincerely, MAG.no 〠

[Смелый]

The main thing that good.......
A detailed study of the question makes it impossible to find your own path to effective solutions.
Sometimes we can restrict capacious phrase "everyone is different", you can try to understand it?
Each evaluates the task level of its possibilities, sometimes omitting the details: "it's simple".
But for someone to these possibilities still need to go on and on, checking and double-checking the postulates.......
Although often we tend to idealize themselves and others, the overestimation of the limiting.


Sincerely, MAG.no 〠

Here! Here! Here it is,,,.. "Although we often tend to idealize themselves and others, the overestimation of limiting."
This is so to the point!
Only add the ending, although there point is.
Limiting that?
Ogranichivaya whom? Yourself? The object of idealization?
Limiting what? Process? Then whose is it?
And this limitation gives or does not give?
I have lately and the reflections in this channel flowed. But honestly, interested in Your arguments or reasons.
With respect!

[Маг.нет]

Limiting what?
Ogranichivaya whom? Yourself? The object of idealization?
Limiting what? Process? Then whose is it?
And this limitation gives or does not give?

In principle this is a generalization, but can partly decrypt its limitations - self "perpetrated the illusion" often create beliefs, knowledge and understanding, and when the human mind set in the registry "label" I know it and understand it so that real information is not perceived and is not processed in full, and why? Limiting ourselves, we often also can limit others, interacting with us, for the above reason, i.e. if interact from a stripped-down limited "illusory position".
The restriction on and limitation of something not finished off, but sometimes this "shortage" can also carry and use depends on the application.
Liked the story: nice to meet you!


Sincerely, MAG.no 〠

[Смелый]

Limiting what?
Ogranichivaya whom? Yourself? The object of idealization?
Limiting what? Process? Then whose is it?
And this limitation gives or does not give?

In principle this is a generalization, but can partly decrypt its limitations - self "perpetrated the illusion" often create beliefs, knowledge and understanding, and when the human mind set in the registry "label" I know it and understand it so that real information is not perceived and is not processed in full, and why? Limiting ourselves, we often also can limit others, interacting with us, for the above reason, i.e. if interact from a stripped-down limited "illusory position".
The restriction on and limitation of something not finished off, but sometimes this "shortage" can also carry and use depends on the application.
Liked the story: nice to meet you!

Sincerely, MAG.no 〠

Everything is very clear. Thank you! Different people have different limitations. Depending on the level of development, or the steps of evolution.

[С. Альбатрос]

besides, at the same time find out what is the photo channel, and what determines the strength and purity of resonance.
but in the same way as strengthen/weaken resonances (channel) to find resonances of Objects in the photographs.
at the same time see what affects another awakening resonances with BJ at the Target and as it is fixed.
and parallel to what is "allocate response" to point out the Object to focus, to separate similar.
to know what close friends differ from strangers to acquaintances through a friend, through personal contact.

MAG.no, but you can more about that? Very interesting!

[Маг.нет]

To me it is not difficult to do, but I don't think it will be useful, I can give only a glimpse of his perception, and therefore suggested to test in a practical way on their own, giving the description of "vantage point" and some aspects of the study to form a conclusion, not the fact that all aspects can surely be perceived, but if you reject his own imagination and created the illusion that a piece of reality to see all of you. Often, as one of the authors: "Our view is that the mistakes of others, the authorship of which we have forgotten" this and build your own worldview (or rather its model), not noticing the real.

As for the nature of some of these aspects, in some part, I tried to convey in previous posts, but noticed that "the steadfastness of the illusion of" restricted normal perception one of the principal interlocutors, I argue there is no reason, I proposed research question is not based on postulates and have seen real effects, have the property of repeatability.

S. Albatross, it is better to show where to look, OK? Well, for example, that "channels of communication" (including mental, etc. "thin" connection) created by the principles of resonance is not a theoretical postulate, and the properties of our energy and consciousness, which, after a careful study you can quite easily check to find the answers within yourself, within your consciousness and therefore manifesting the resonance between 2 "points" (Objects, subjects, what is the number of pairs of points), we first show (detectable resonances) and create connection (Sepetiba - focusing her attention, bringing a certain amount of energy effect concentration) between these "dots" on the principle of a=A, that is the characteristic of our consciousness (often used for simplicity) to combine a similar. Well, for example we can consider two seemingly similar subjects - well, at least a pair of boots))))))) on the market, finding in them some common details and elements we show the resonances between them (similarities), we can when we what it need to power this connection, focusing on its elements and channels between the "total points", enhance focus at the maximum possible consciousness "points" (this is just about "PixelNet"), to select and use for communication more meaningful (or more dense) the channel may have (but in any case the maximum will be as it is limited by the capacity of consciousness it "PixelNet" and the potential for the operation of the channel and the ability to determine the density of different channels in case of a channel such a connection is often partly dissipated (there are exceptions - some relationships, such as generic, is additionally recorded in the memory of the World in inaccessible for us region), although for a while leaving a trail in memory of the consciousness as the long - term context), or weaken like to find besides the points of similarity, then the same points and differences, and to power (let's say our consciousness has the potential of "PixelNet" 100% "points", if 50% of the differences, the relationship will weaken, maybe 2 times - if the significance between the "points" (channels) are approximately equal, if different importance, this factor will also affect the degree of weakening), or simply to dispel (all boots something similar, so in a certain context, the similarity is almost irrelevant, the relationship is weakened and it depends on the point of view of our consciousness), etc........

Michael_ sorry it's really to 2.1 does not apply, but there is a question, maybe in another place will be useful.


Sincerely, MAG.no 〠<

[Андрей С.]

IMHO the resonance is in itself, because it is his nature. A pair of resonating objects resonate not because some operator in your consciousness creates a link, but because these are their properties. If you hit one tuning fork, the second will start to ring, not because some operator has focused their attention powered the connection between them, but because they resonate. And it's really observable effect. In addition, the resonance is not a channel, it's a completely different mechanism.

P. S. MAG.no, your opinion is clear to me and not close, but I'm not going to argue - I'm just expressing my opinion based on my experience, that's all. "Researching the question" if your words.

[С. Альбатрос]

IMHO the resonance is in itself, because it is his nature. A pair of resonating objects resonate not because some operator in your consciousness creates a link, but because these are their properties. If you hit one tuning fork, the second will start to ring, not because some operator has focused their attention powered the connection between them, but because they resonate. And it's really observable effect. And Yes, the resonance is not a channel, it's a completely different mechanism.

Then what's your channel? It seems to me that resonance in this case is a tool to create a channel. Roughly speaking, tuning forks resonate, because the operator hit one of them That is, the operator in this case acts as a trigger to create a (select one of the existing ones?) resonance, though there is of course such as natural resonances set by the World or other. But I think the higher the awareness of the operator, the more lucid, effective and harmonious resonances may initiate or make adjustments to existing resonance, although in this case the degree of responsibility increases very sharply (though it increases in proportion to the force).

"channels of communication" (including mental, etc. "thin" connection)

Does this mean that to create a channel, it is possible to use not only mental? For example, if I put the matrix on a photo of his daughter, then by default I will train not only mental but also emotions, family channels, etc. Can we say that the channel efficiency is not only depth (PixelNet) connection, but the breadth of channels used? Or on the contrary it weakens, dissipates the momentum? Another question in connection with the example about which I wrote above. Is it possible to communicate not with a physical object, for example to tie BJ to the process (that is, me as in the above example, contact is made with the process of creating products specific person, regardless of time) and is it possible to set the channel to the event and to tie BJ to another point in time? Somehow, I think that it is possible, based at least from the example of chronopuncture, the only thing is not sure that this is for me personally, nevertheless due to the fact that the establishment of the most complex relationships, and in this case is affected to some extent, and causal plan, requires more energy-intensive and net Explorer (operator), and it is possible that in this process there are lots of other features, which I don't know.
As for the photo, it seems to me that it is only a help for the operator in establishing or identifying the necessary resonances. In Pratchett, it seems in "a Hat full of sky" I like this example, when one of the characters notices that the image of a horse cut in the turf is not like a horse (just waves), to which the heroine replies: "that's not how the horse looks, is that the horse is". That is, the image is only an illusion of the real object, but it can facilitate communication. If you concentrate on what the object target "is" the other side of the resonances, whether photographer or depicted things around just will not be taken into account.
The topic is very interesting, you may continue it for example in a branch Technique of the operator BJ to not offtopic?<

[Маг.нет]

How looking at boots I understand that it boots? May know a priori, not associating with other boots familiar to You? To show resonance it is necessary to compare, and the comparison occurs in the area of attention and it is often a single that combines. By striking one tuning fork will sound different if adjusted intercommunications distributed through a wave in space, all tuning forks located at a distance (the relationship is weakened by an important parameter of the wave fades away before contact) it will sound, even if they are tuned to the same frequency. The relationship between people is built on the same principle of attunement of the structures within (the principle of resonance), the resonance is at the root of communication, the basis of the channel as a result of interaction between 2 resonating structures if the interaction is not, you cannot argue about the presence (or lack of ability) of the resonance. Any channel of interaction based on the resonance when the focus on object and "cling" it to memory, then leave "its mark" (imprint mental), that "fingerprint" and resonate the structure of my mental with remote interaction with an Object.
The word resonance borrowed from French resonanse, which in turn is derived from the Latin resone - respond, the response represents feedback in the interaction, interaction without bilateral contact to a two-way contact channel is not strange. Therefore, it is not clear what meaning lay in the word "resonance", probably some kind of personally-individual, is fundamentally not relevant obsidionalis value.
What trying your perception to distort the essence of what I have written is of course Your right....... that says a lot.

Michael_ once again I apologize, and participants discussion I suggest to move your question to another branch.


Sincerely, MAG.no 〠<

[Михаил_]

to display the properties of the same 2.1 there is no "channel" is not needed, just the beginning of the video was not made to overlay on the photo (you could provide such an option), and in the case of nasogenian there are a number of side factors. But the consciousness of the operator is a side factor that dunno what more (helps or hinders), perhaps 50: 50 Especially if the consciousness of the operator has any stable representation running counter to what is happening and that it (consciousness) is powerful enough.
Pro channel is a separate issue not related to the topic, in the sense that it is and how it works and why.
Of course working with photos in General should think more carefully how it manifests itself. In the case of physical media is point-to-media (the subject).
In the case of the module copier - this object selects one of many possibilities (sometimes several) and without the conscious participation of the operator.
In the case of the photo material seems to be not. Actually it is, but it is not the operator, not the recipient, not the photo or disk. And also not accidentally caught in the photo items, exactly like not ordinary items of everyday life of the recipient.
In General, the understanding of the resonances and their importance in the processes is very weak. People used the usual for his consciousness categories to determine operating mechanisms.
Again I was drawn into this flood

[Маг.нет]

Albatros C. I am ready to answer, but in another thread.
Michael_ I agree, that is where this all started, of course the media 2.1 may not necessarily be there, and so we see where the interaction structures of the BZ with the Target material and there is nothing there, all the more vysokochastotnye the physical world is another layer, but if we for what purposes we use the principles of relationships through consciousness, their realization (dependent on the parameters of the consciousness of the Operator and skills in their organization's size) is also useful to take into account. Not many people consciousness is a priori unable to allocate from the photos the structure of which "charges" BJ and send "somewhere there" and will arrive most likely "somewhere there", only here where?
Michael_ like something in the presence of a time slice, move to another branch, such as "Equipment Operator BJ", and there will continue.......


Sincerely, MAG.no 〠