СК1М
Good afternoon, Michael.
Received the parcel today with СК1М and BJ is 2.6. The question is: for better attunement with the device ( if I understand correctly, reading the forum) to put on garments.table something "their" ( photo, hair, etc) How long is all of this supposed to lie there? I want to go its target (text) to put. Thank you.
Received the parcel today with СК1М and BJ is 2.6. The question is: for better attunement with the device ( if I understand correctly, reading the forum) to put on garments.table something "their" ( photo, hair, etc) How long is all of this supposed to lie there? I want to go its target (text) to put. Thank you.
1. Contraption, Yes it is possible to structure the water, for example by including a track for cleaning the premises and then charging water (living water).
2. Наталья73. Enough to hold the device for about 15-20 minutes in hand. In addition, there are audio settings for the impact of the object (You in this case), you can run it for 30 minutes and put on this photo.
Most effective is working with the aim of using recorded audio, but you need to careful with the wording. If you have any unusual - just think that the wording may not be entirely thought out. Podesavate formulation to the harmonious flow of the other aspects of their lives, i.e. to the end was over the goal going forward at the head of everything.
2. Наталья73. Enough to hold the device for about 15-20 minutes in hand. In addition, there are audio settings for the impact of the object (You in this case), you can run it for 30 minutes and put on this photo.
Most effective is working with the aim of using recorded audio, but you need to careful with the wording. If you have any unusual - just think that the wording may not be entirely thought out. Podesavate formulation to the harmonious flow of the other aspects of their lives, i.e. to the end was over the goal going forward at the head of everything.
Good evening!
Michael let the question of the UK ?
-The device I have 6 days. Double-charged water (to achieve goals). During charging of the water on audio filed audio ( for charging the water with this thread). Since the trek is short, only a few minutes, I have it in a continuous cycle was set at 4 hours. Is this correct?
- 4 days on the device is a "goal". Focused on goals, myself formulated her verbally and itself at this time with a marker drew an abstraction. Then a figure down on the stage SK. Is this correct?
For users of the UK, on average, how long or how quickly it is realized the purpose?
Sorry if questions are stupid. I'm a noob, got it all hard
Michael let the question of the UK ?
-The device I have 6 days. Double-charged water (to achieve goals). During charging of the water on audio filed audio ( for charging the water with this thread). Since the trek is short, only a few minutes, I have it in a continuous cycle was set at 4 hours. Is this correct?
- 4 days on the device is a "goal". Focused on goals, myself formulated her verbally and itself at this time with a marker drew an abstraction. Then a figure down on the stage SK. Is this correct?
For users of the UK, on average, how long or how quickly it is realized the purpose?
Sorry if questions are stupid. I'm a noob, got it all hard
1. All right.
2. Speed of implementation depends on the purpose. Some, especially abstract, and not correctly formulated, sometimes almost instantly. I think he wrote - Basil formulated the "safety" in an audio statement of objectives because it is relatively famously rides (drives), it "secured" immediately he began to stand in traffic jams, although this was normally all. Rephrase - tube is gone out of the way. Movement in traffic (slow) - much safer.
In the new formulation, he walked around it a softer criterion of safety. Goals tied to the realization of something tangible can different times to operate from very short to long, depends on how realistic this is not for You (speculative) and reality (i.e. is there a short way among the probabilities of the events).
2. Speed of implementation depends on the purpose. Some, especially abstract, and not correctly formulated, sometimes almost instantly. I think he wrote - Basil formulated the "safety" in an audio statement of objectives because it is relatively famously rides (drives), it "secured" immediately he began to stand in traffic jams, although this was normally all. Rephrase - tube is gone out of the way. Movement in traffic (slow) - much safer.
In the new formulation, he walked around it a softer criterion of safety. Goals tied to the realization of something tangible can different times to operate from very short to long, depends on how realistic this is not for You (speculative) and reality (i.e. is there a short way among the probabilities of the events).
-
Новик
there was a view of the UK? (SK is still not SP at all....)....Новик wrote:Michael_
Don't remember have already been asked this question or not on the forum....
Do you plan to open a Club for owners of SP?
1. we plan to start giving theoretical information (like seminars, articles, etc.) in different forms (online and in person). The most part free of charge and without restrictions. Maybe not all (because some things are just time consuming).
2. you can organize a separate area of the forum, the club, if it is necessary to use SK.
Separately I please ask a maximum of questions, including on language - publicly. Most of the forum is still anonymous... and the answers useful to many, because in many respects repeat similar issues and errors.
I, in turn, there is another question to active users. Periodically it turns out that there piece not mass product with unique properties. Often it is something on the way to the final version, but with some among the enhanced properties, sometimes specially made, for example to study aspects of the operation of such a device.
Many of them go to their or stand long on the shelf waiting for the master.
Sometimes I think it would be possible to offer them wishing for some, such as auction-based. But in view of custom-made products and unusual products - just not sharing. I.e. if there is relatively speaking, more than 5 people interested in a unusual exclusive, it would be possible to do it quietly for their own.
Price range from literally zero (shelves sometimes also need to free) to + infinity
(some things are unique).I have not yet returned to the city, I need a few days of city life, to start sharing, the program is ready. Guided by the end to the beginning of the week (approximately).Наталья73 wrote:Good day, Michael!
Is there any news on the offset.the program to СК1М ? Are there any known time frame?
Thank you
a little bit about the wording in the UK (and BJ and all of the wording).
You should understand that Your idea of goals is not always beneficial route in life. Sometimes it happens almost face internal conflict. Ie people can objective factors to choose a goal that is a dead end. Not necessarily an error in the selection, sometimes, an error in a total impossibility. Roughly speaking, the world has a gap wider which it to bend to one side - impossible, but you can pass around. Why not? for example, because it would have affected world events is a huge resistance (how would You feel about it).
Sometimes simpler is just the subconscious knows favorable route, or danger ahead, you need to get around, and people rushing on the situation on the basis of its world view and logic. Even if it seems to him that this intuition, often it is only the integral perception of the picture. Assessment is not logic, but based on the internal picture of the world. This assessment is not a reading of the possible consequences, but only the desired scenario.
The power of man over the world is not absolute because there are other people.... which also somehow change the world. Gaps changes enable you to choose a favourable route, but not always one that we would perceive as ideal. Often it also happens that some unique opportunity we are just not visible, though it is.
What am I?
On the wording of the targets, leave the path for non-standard alternatives in your wording. Do not squeeze the desired at any cost, to better harmonise events.
The hardest part of this to be ready for change, for such a scenario, which is not expected by us, but is often more favourable than expected.
It really requires skill and a certain habits, may initially appear stable, then estimated the true power of this approach.
But from the point of view of language is also important to keep such possibilities in them.
You should understand that Your idea of goals is not always beneficial route in life. Sometimes it happens almost face internal conflict. Ie people can objective factors to choose a goal that is a dead end. Not necessarily an error in the selection, sometimes, an error in a total impossibility. Roughly speaking, the world has a gap wider which it to bend to one side - impossible, but you can pass around. Why not? for example, because it would have affected world events is a huge resistance (how would You feel about it).
Sometimes simpler is just the subconscious knows favorable route, or danger ahead, you need to get around, and people rushing on the situation on the basis of its world view and logic. Even if it seems to him that this intuition, often it is only the integral perception of the picture. Assessment is not logic, but based on the internal picture of the world. This assessment is not a reading of the possible consequences, but only the desired scenario.
The power of man over the world is not absolute because there are other people.... which also somehow change the world. Gaps changes enable you to choose a favourable route, but not always one that we would perceive as ideal. Often it also happens that some unique opportunity we are just not visible, though it is.
What am I?
On the wording of the targets, leave the path for non-standard alternatives in your wording. Do not squeeze the desired at any cost, to better harmonise events.
The hardest part of this to be ready for change, for such a scenario, which is not expected by us, but is often more favourable than expected.
It really requires skill and a certain habits, may initially appear stable, then estimated the true power of this approach.
But from the point of view of language is also important to keep such possibilities in them.
-
Новик
Michael_
The club is a good thing for me! + we can understand how many of us are active users...
Mneb PTS it was interesting to read who and what has been achieved by using SP in the event the plan!
Pieces are always interesting so please keep me in mind.
P/S
Although I feel if an auction I Mage.net have not conccurent
Yes of course SK sorry for the typo....there was a view of the UK?
The club is a good thing for me! + we can understand how many of us are active users...
Mneb PTS it was interesting to read who and what has been achieved by using SP in the event the plan!
Pieces are always interesting so please keep me in mind
.P/S
Although I feel if an auction I Mage.net have not conccurent
well, I do not insist, just do not come up with other ideas for the piece goods which are in principle not possible to make a duplicate (will be something else).
I.e. either you need to declare a number that, in principle, a Convention, criteria for alignment evaluation of the artifact and money paperwork is generally an abstraction satisfying a number of conditions (so to speak under the criterion of place, time, people), but then get at the piece number of the principle "first come, first" - is possible, but potential disputes.
Either make a different principle of priority, either to throw out this idea yet, which is probably the sensible option.
I want while to understand do I need this someone and over the such a reasonable threshold that gives meaning to the idea.
In General I would be pleased if useful things to stand and will not find his master.
I.e. either you need to declare a number that, in principle, a Convention, criteria for alignment evaluation of the artifact and money paperwork is generally an abstraction satisfying a number of conditions (so to speak under the criterion of place, time, people), but then get at the piece number of the principle "first come, first" - is possible, but potential disputes.
Either make a different principle of priority, either to throw out this idea yet, which is probably the sensible option.
I want while to understand do I need this someone and over the such a reasonable threshold that gives meaning to the idea.
In General I would be pleased if useful things to stand and will not find his master.
ie it is not actionnote - I am not a supporter of wrap hype and amounts. I just can say the lower level contingent valuation, and a certain number of participants need to have some way to agree on who needs or wants to have more, perhaps instead of putting the lower threshold of its usefulness, perhaps different from mine.
In the truest sense of the word is not an auction.
Invite other reasonable scheme - I'll listen.
In the truest sense of the word is not an auction.
Invite other reasonable scheme - I'll listen.
with the presentation of information there are several points.рыжая wrote:Michael, a good and useful thing planned.
Especially in terms of the right to organize the flow of information.
On the one hand it is quite relevant and important to many.
On the other hand I am opposed to the formation of new schools and do not like to support specific existing narrows the range of perception and some forms of dogma, is not always helpful.
I.e. I always try to avoid unambiguous flow theory, it is generally without practice means little. I try to avoid and in General to pull in some unambiguous assessment of the people.
But do not give information or give it only in the description of the products, too, has its flaws, as an allegorical presentation, although it is the most valuable.
How not to create dogmas and monocane and give something useful ? quite difficult that I ever stopped.
Everything else is simply no time.
For this reason, had shaken the people and to obtain agreement in principle of several people to participate in this information activity.
So apparently there is a speech that will be given is not a "coherent theory" and some have a purely practical aspect. Ie giving to gain experience. And give her different people, in the framework of his understanding, naturally different, not identical.
The result is hard "utgivare" in a certain model (and the models are usually slightly different from reality) should get something soft, but enabling them to acquire deeper experience and understanding.
this is an auction in the truest sense.Михаил_ wrote:I Just can say the lower level contingent valuation, and a certain number of participants need to have some way to agree on who needs or wants to have more, perhaps instead of putting the lower threshold of its usefulness, perhaps different from mine.
In the truest sense of the word is not an auction.
but in my opinion, not worth the bother...
formulation of capacity-functionality, price, pushed back in time the date of sale, in the process of consultation on the feasibility of using a particular operator for a particular purpose, in any case (not to create hype) INDIVIDUAL OFFER every POTENTIAL BUYER.
Can you? Or otherwise?
Sincerely, MAG.no
to publish in a narrow closed section time need. Consultation of benefits assumed. Individual offer - well, it's too hard.
As for auctiondata, I wanted to spread the floor(lower bound) estimates and potential. Ie to give the opportunity to pay as much as appropriate and possible, that it gives me a chance almost eliminated from the process if the group of participants is narrow, it does not oblige itself to bargain.
It's just the same principle of feedback. I say "it is the ruble or higher." You say that you expect to use on 50 and will pay, or you can say - let the ruble will. Utryasanie concurently relations between participants at their small number and adequacy is not necessarily the subject of trade. It could just be a mutual agreement.
To put different people of different conditions I do not want absolutely, but to use the opportunity of a personal estimation, probably Yes.
However, I heard You. While this is only an idea, in connection with the appearance on the shelf next pair of samples.
Maybe I will give up this idea, if you want too isolated. As well, I don't like a large crowd to gather.
After the elimination of stockpiles of such proposals are likely to be relatively rare 1-2 in a month or two.
As for auctiondata, I wanted to spread the floor(lower bound) estimates and potential. Ie to give the opportunity to pay as much as appropriate and possible, that it gives me a chance almost eliminated from the process
if the group of participants is narrow, it does not oblige itself to bargain.It's just the same principle of feedback. I say "it is the ruble or higher." You say that you expect to use on 50 and will pay, or you can say - let the ruble will. Utryasanie concurently relations between participants at their small number and adequacy is not necessarily the subject of trade. It could just be a mutual agreement.
To put different people of different conditions I do not want absolutely, but to use the opportunity of a personal estimation, probably Yes.
However, I heard You. While this is only an idea, in connection with the appearance on the shelf next pair of samples.
Maybe I will give up this idea, if you want too isolated. As well, I don't like a large crowd to gather.
After the elimination of stockpiles of such proposals are likely to be relatively rare 1-2 in a month or two.
Маг.нет wrote:INDIVIDUAL OFFER every POTENTIAL BUYER.
Are talking about different things in the sentence lay a different meaning - sending proposals to potential buyers. And closed the site then not necessarily.Михаил_ wrote:to Put different people of different conditions I do not want absolutely, but to use the opportunity of a personal estimation, probably Yes.
Singleness, too, is a demand, maybe limited.Михаил_ wrote:Probably I will give up this idea, if you want too isolated.
Sincerely, MAG.no
For arguments - Yes understanding - Yes, this is for commercial offers - not always.Михаил_ wrote:the closed section - the answers to case questions and other things then are made 1 time but not 10
On a closed platform (much more efficient) to implement the presentation of the material, discuss it, but sales... you can be unhappy. Well, not the first day live. Often there is a conflict of interest. I need! And he... and enemies (the most dangerous! - silent) acquire. Best friends find...
Sincerely, MAG.no