Panacea or product "P"

[Михаил_]

the answer depends on many factors. In principle Yes and no.

[Андрей С.]

With regards to video a Panacea. Had the idea to make not just a listing of several frames and to do a serial capture pictures with video at intervals a second and be merged by tiling into one large image. The links itself. I think it's much more powerful than just a frame, and considering the possibility of programming Panacea, you can find interesting application.

2250 x 1300 px (the size of one frame is 50 x 50 px), 5.43 MB
4500 x 2600 px (the size of one frame is 100 x 100 px), 22.9 MB

upd. If the links die, pokojowka also have here.

[Михаил_]

well, theoretically, I can put the initial sequence of images that were video or binary file.

[Андрей С.]

This is a direct source work

I've even thought, in the absence of AT and, as a consequence, AF, is it possible to program the tool for performing similar functions (primarily clean food)? For example, the construct "food container - matrix - printout"?

[Михаил_]

2. can
1. the source is something else
and this is just one of manifold ways of display including resonances. Not the best and not the worst.

[Андрей С.]

Thanks, I will try. More precisely, are already trying. For computer programming easier to write if-then-else, while if the error, the compiler will swear I hope I'm intuitively doing everything right. Well, in any case, it is necessary to train once to learn.

[Михаил_]

for computers just much more difficult - an algorithmic error in a complex program sometimes it is possible and through the years to detect only external manifestation. I was a specialist on the subject-the students write, say, "ready", I come to check and visit effect-enter all the standard actions in abnormal condition. Then they still the same bugs combed. And it's good when not on the users.
And here all is easier - working as intended. The perfect programming language.

[Андрей С.]

The algorithmic error is Yes, know.

As programmed for the processing of food Panacea (printout + matrix) works fine. Sometimes a slight change in the taste of the food, some foods change texture. Barely, but there is a difference. A couple of times was that the taste was disgusting (once a banana and once with store-bought sour cream... you know, that stuff, but would like to), apparently the products were bad, did not eat, of course. The first two days I had strange sensations of energy, like enough, and physically in the hands-the legs feel weak... as if the body does not adjust to the new level or what? Now I feel great. These two days has redness under the bracelets, all the bracelets (Panacea and 3.0 N, both ebony) "bite", especially 3.0, I realized it was cleaning, due to the improvement of the General level, i.e. there is a little more opportunity the body to be cleansed.

Here's another I wrote a question to Michael, but while writing, he understood Apparently, the "Guide to the experience of" programming Panacea works.

[Андрей С.]

In continuation of my experiments to Cure and processing of food. Slightly altered its programme. If I understand correctly the principles of programming Panacea (if no, please Michael can correct me), I can set the access levels for backup and modification program (authorization TO). I let the program copy it to any person. That is, as I understand it, you can take any surface (Yes, even a sheet of paper coated with P-matrix, but I prefer the above-described printing) to Cure and give the command "copy to this surface program "Panacea-Food from Saband" (this is my nickname on OpenMagic, I decided that it was better than Andrey S. as here), and to try what happens

[Михаил_]

yeah, that's right.

[Пианистка]

Hi all

and you, sorry, feel your right hemisphere?

After 1.0 BJ I'm in a good mood and conflict decreased, and Panacea Lite wear only a couple of days - not all the time, and clearly beginning to feel like a pronounced burning sensation right side of head))) and the impression - that was hot and the outside and inside)))

took a Panacea - and a pleasant chill...

and how are you?

[Владмосква]

Andrew S., how is Your program similar to the effects from the product "Artifact food"? viewtopic.php?f=31&t=4765 (AF - food)

Reviews about the AF are very similar.

[Воффка]

and how are you?

In different ways, read the forum

[Алекс С]

Andrew S.let question:
I understand that Michael approved the wording, but I don't understand its meaning.

Up to this point I believed that P is programmed or a reference to an existing devicefor example:
the Panacea, copied data sheets and the fridge and all the details of the program "Artifact food".

Or, if we do not know whether there is such a device, you specify the ultimate goal:
the Panacea, to create in the refrigerator space that improves the beneficial properties of eating that reduces harmful properties of foods and ensure the maximum recovery through food from the refrigerator.

Or softer combined (properties + link) wording:
the Panacea, put this refrigerator useful properties, similar to the action of the product "Artifact food".


In Your statement You, if I understand correctly, referring to himself:
"copy on this surface program "Panacea-Food from Saband"

Therefore, either You have your own programme "Cure-Food", or I don't understand something.

Please explain to me and the rest of Thermopolis.

[Воффка]

Alex
He created his own program for pantanoso TO, well, something like a short module created. And the command "Panacea-Food from Saband" launches already specified Abandom sequence of actions. So as Michael has created a "command" to "T1" or Konstantin "hot Creek". From panacea TO this-openly and publicly programmed the thing, everyone wants to(and can) can create something of their own and it will be available to all. Of course if it fits(will not be contrary to the principles of work and interaction TO).

Question about the granularity of actions already specified above, soon, probably will hear the answer

[Андрей С.]

Andrew S. how Your program is similar to the effects from the product "Artifact food"? viewtopic.php?f=31&t=4765 (AF - food)
Reviews about the AF are very similar.

AF not tried. The goal was to create something like the AF initially. To judge how it turned out, I think we should try both. If someone is going to try and write a review, I would be very grateful.

Next. As far as I know

up To this point I believed that P is programmed either by a link on an existing device, for example:
Panacea, copy data sheets and the fridge and all the details of the program "Artifact food".

Yes, if it is open to copying.

Or, if we do not know whether there is such a device, you specify the ultimate goal:
Panacea, build in the refrigerator space that improves the beneficial properties of eating that reduces harmful properties of foods and ensure the maximum recovery through food from the refrigerator.

Too abstract wording, IMHO. All the same, as if I'm doing the program for Chinese of the world, in his eyes not seen, and no idea what it was, with the phrase "let the ball heals me"

Or more soft combined (properties + link) wording:
Panacea, put this refrigerator useful properties, similar to the action of the product "Artifact food".

In my opinion, also unfortunate wording. Similar to what? How? To what extent?

In Your statement You, if I understand correctly, referring to himself:
"copy on this surface program "Panacea-Food from Saband"

Therefore, either You have your own programme "Cure-Food", or I don't understand something.

Not quite. I have created a specific program (sequence of actions). The phrase is a reference to the program. The closest analogy: http://www.google.com/chrome/ — link to the browser (the program). Only then the phrase still performs like the function of the installer from Ie all the people who know the link (the phrase) can download the installer and install the program. So it is here. The program is not me, in the sense that it is stored is clearly not in my head or on some physical medium I just wanted to check with Michael this question. As I understand it, it is stored in a sort of common information field of the Earth? Or in the information field of chain bracelets (if there is)?

, He created a program for pantanoso TO, well, something like a short module created. And the command "Panacea-Food from Saband" launches already specified Abandom sequence of actions. So as Michael has created a "command" to "T1" or Konstantin "hot Creek". From panacea TO this-openly and publicly programmed the thing, everyone wants to(and can) can create something of their own and it will be available to all. Of course if it fits(will not be contrary to the principles of work and interaction TO).

Yes, that's right, it's not only the module never <

[Михаил_]

1.Andrew on all counts wrote is absolutely correct comments.
Indeed, the reproduction of similar properties is possible only for "open programs". I do not always leave them open. You can also change the availability of source code, i.e., the openness is at different levels (many of them) and in some cases it is possible to modify the original program, and in some cases - only copy.
Described and prokomentiroval wording, do not a good. Panacea not a Professor and expert system, in order for such descriptions to realize the correct end result. Programming usually occurs on a figurative level, and contains (at least in my case) a number of complex and very complex statements associated with beliefs about the interaction of objects, information, energy and so on. Ie, a multidimensional picture of the future of the program, its self-study and other factors, including the algorithms of interaction with other products.
2. any such program is really not the least bit module, the modules do not involve TO initially (only the second) and in another sense at all - they have the experience.

[Алекс С]

prokomentiroval Described and the wording is really not good.

And can be a good formulation in the context of the "Panacea and food", without using AF-food and programs from saband?

[Михаил_]

1.I seem in Russian wrote - I do not use language at all. Word.
2.No. Impossible. With fat besites ? and that does not suit You and it. Make me something else, preferably Halavanau.
Don't like neither this nor that - you do. It is necessary once a student.

[Андрей С.]

Programming usually occurs on a figurative level, and contains (at least in my case) a number of complex and very complex statements associated with beliefs about the interaction of objects, information, energy and so on. Ie, a multidimensional picture of the future of the program, its self-study and other factors, including the algorithms of interaction with other products.

I have on the same principle, only the difficulty level is less The wording I use only as an auxiliary in the early stages. Actually, the closest analogy for me is "the failure of the husk" by OLDI.

Michael, thank you for your comments your confirmation gives extra confidence in their own abilities and understanding And yet, if I may, I would like clarification on this issue:

As I understand it, it (the program) is stored in some kind of a common information field of the Earth? Or in the information field of chain bracelets (if there is)?

[Михаил_]

I have on the same principle, only the difficulty level is less The wording I use only as an auxiliary in the early stages. Actually, the closest analogy for me is "the failure of the husk" by OLDI.

Michael, thank you for your comments your confirmation gives extra confidence in their own abilities and understanding And yet, if I may, I would like clarification on this issue:

As I understand it, it (the program) is stored in some kind of a common information field of the Earth? Or in the information field of chain bracelets (if there is)?

well, the program is stored in the local cell formation, which can live either in this world or may not be in it (for example TO 3.0), with some exaggeration, we can say that "in the information field of this world," since all even beyond, as in the case with 3.0, originally feet grow to the cell created as БЖ1.0 with the direct assistance of this world.
However, due to the flexibility and lot of functionality, cellular organisms to a greater extent Autonomous.
Their structure has a tree base (tree branches grow to several dozens of the first providers), and through the trees within them and between them, possible direct communication, so it is easy to find the desired version of the desired program or part of it.
Initially, cells, in addition to direct actions, information, matter, physical phenomena and energy (which generally is the same) can shrink from trouble-free release of energy, eat junk energy, archived (in invisible state), to create databases, to educate themselves and to seek information and so on.
Well, the system authorization, as everyone already knows works at the proper level.
We should say that it has been long said - when you try to create something promising threat to the world, TO such an object will collapse sooner or later (usually sooner) in advance of such incidents, and this may happen for several schemes (automatically if there is in the basic program as the panacea peer solution to outside observers, the decision of the owner of the tree programs, according to the decision of the world without the participation of the people). Thus, the probability of a negative use FOR extremely low, although slight kinks that are not excluded of course.<

[Андрей С.]

Thank you!

[Алекс С]

1.I seem in Russian wrote - I do not use language at all. Word.
2.No. Impossible. With fat besites ? and that does not suit You and it. Make me something else, preferably Halavanau.
Don't like neither this nor that - you do. It is necessary once a student.

That P is programmed, written on both forums on multiple pages.

How it is programmed - I have not yet found and/or not realized.

So probably a couple of months in my environment revolve N-Lite on a variety of items, endowed, as I sincerely thought these or other properties, or rather giving those things that I caused it. "Programmed" they are language on the type above.

It turns out that it is wrong. Nothing wrong, did wrong, try to improve, that's life.
In itself, the matrix P is also remarkable.

Therefore, it asked the question.

"It is necessary once to learn" (C) Michael

As I understand, it is best programmed "panacea-stick" and "Stickers "Panacea" without applied programs"
(however, these same principles apply to P-Lite, just the efficiency by orders of magnitude less)

Buyers of these artifacts are much morethan the makers of "Panacea-Food from Saband", "hot Creek from Constantine" and "T1 from Michael".

As they are using them.

I just want to understand that buyers make "Stickers "Panacea" without applied programs" if they are not Michael, Saband or Constantine...

What would you advise to read the users of these artifacts to their use has been effective?

[Михаил_]

1.I suspect, or rather know that buyers of these their great program without really thinking how. And get remarkable results. I'm with some familiar and well aware that many of these results are very public.
2. programmed verbal complex finished products (IC, Y4, etc.) or work modules BJ (this really is an appeal to imagine it). An attempt to program a panacea basic verbal formulations will give some result, probably positive, but it will be much weaker imaginative programming.
3. In General, the main objective of panacea is to restore man to a state where he has no questions as to programming, well, then, plus to assist in the implementation of its activities before he'll often wish to keep as 3.0, so if not, then this is the reason for the passive to work with BJ and to work on themselves in terms of energy development and clean cocoon (known methods).

[Алекс С]

1. Michael, thanks for the explanation.
2. Michael, if You don't mind, I will continue the theme, if the mind postpone it for 3 months.

So as not to distract Michael, in this letter I turn to Constantine, to Saband, or to any user BJ, who uses a programming panacea in their practice.

As I understand it, programming P, especially flash drives and stickers, possibly without the state of 3.0, although the latter is desirable, because it increases efficiency. And programming is possible for anyone, not just those who have a couple of years in the subject, has dozens of powerful artifacts and sensitive skills. Of course, success will be different, but the shortcomings of the operator can partially cover an extensive way.

P programmiruya mental, not wording. And what is "mental" without 3.0?
Consciousness gives us the channels of the senses (A, b, K) as tools in memory and design, and of course internal dialogue.
Internal dialogue, I realized there was no honor, as it is the same the wording is only silence.
There is only the design on the basis of the senses, such as visualization.

Can the visualization program P?
Give me an step by step example, please.
(of course not using ready-made programs, and create their own)