Otherwise it would be at least strange. We are not them, they not us our goals and objectives IMHO vary with the motivation of those that is very excited and wants any tips, in particular light.And yet our universe collapses...Two and a half years ago a Swiss scientist Antognini Aldo (Aldo Antognini) surprised the scientific world when stated that the size of the radius of the proton is 0,84185 of the femtometer (1 FM = 10-15 m). Up to this point, the common number was equal 0,8768 FM, and it is clear that on the proton level, the difference was very significant. Then there was found no reasonable explanation for this discrepancy. Suggested options included the error in the value of the Rydberg constant, in the equation for the energy levels and spectral lines, or an error in the theory of quantum electrodynamics (QED). The latter, incidentally, was questioned late last year when an experiment on electron beam ion trap, held at the National Institute of standards and technology, USA, have shown that the electrons in the ions may behave contrary to quantum electrodynamics.
Recently Professor Antonini dealt another blow to the CED. Again he measured the radius of the proton, and again found that the radius is less even than the value previously obtained Professor. The current experiment showed that the radius 0.84087 FM. For this purpose the researcher used muonic hydrogen, where the proton around the nucleus is the electron the muon is spinning. Because the muons are 207 times heavier than electrons, they are located closer to the proton, and to populate the orbitals with higher energy is more energy. Accordingly, the greater the difference in the amount of energy, the easier it is to measure. When injected pulse of directed laser radiation, the excitation of the muon and its transfer to another orbital, after which the muon is returned to the low energy state and emits a photon in the x-ray spectrum.
