Post
by Навигатор » Fri Aug 31, 2012 10:02
I asked the question about dekamevit, in General, about vitamins friend the pharmacist. And that's what I he replied.
"Dekamevit - Soviet multivitamin preparation, the composition large - 11 components, but now there are more.
after the last Soviet years, a winter and spring one - day + 5 more components ( including, Cu, glutamic acid).
There are old multivitamin - the whole family - there are no Riboflavin, and methionine. In the sale of undevit like is still there.
At the crossroads of a new time appeared Complivit (more than dekamevit components are the same, but no methionine - maybe the problem of raw materials). Now Complivit - commercial series, the top selling multivitamin.
What can be noted:
1. Soviet preparations have passed clinical tests, has been done for a long time - 15-20 years old, were and some science.
2. Soviet preparations were made on domestic raw materials, domestic synthesis differed from the West, the quality of the components is not bad and it was stable.
3. Accordingly now only possible remakes, even if the composition is the same, all components - 100% China - we have no synthesis. Quality jumps - each shipment from China to their settings.
4. The digestibility of multicomponent drugs has always been under question - some of the components will prevent the absorption of others, etc. In the Soviet years was considered the standard Japanese multivitamins, they do not have now.
5. What prevents to take a handful of pills with different vitamins:
- sort of uncomfortable (this is important for the old grandmother);
+ may be cheaper (for a multivitamin beating)
+ you can divide the intake throughout the day - the absorption will be better
+ quality control in monopreparations maximum in the complex preparations of the chemical analysis is extremely difficult, especially for impurities - therefore, the merchants of mixed drugs can with impunity put "rotten" components.
But in General, the concept of medication for future use, just in case, to put it mildly untenable."