Are you alive in there?
Reviews about the effects of version 3.0
-
Новик
Dimas
Well Gud then
I have my own "Greek" coffee love
PS.
Do was born the idea that we need to consider some sort of list of tests for checking devices.
Ie, reproduce what ever the situation(artificially) not quite simple and watch the developments noting not normal....
Example: Put 2 bracelet 3.0 put on СК1М recharge operator
Give yourself (installation)the intention to receive discounts in the boutiques(the market) and we go to the market tracked where made discount if 3 boutiques in 2 do a discount then make the appropriate conclusions...
Well Gud then
I have my own "Greek" coffee love
PS.
Do was born the idea that we need to consider some sort of list of tests for checking devices.
Ie, reproduce what ever the situation(artificially) not quite simple and watch the developments noting not normal....
Example: Put 2 bracelet 3.0 put on СК1М recharge operator
Give yourself (installation)the intention to receive discounts in the boutiques(the market) and we go to the market tracked where made discount if 3 boutiques in 2 do a discount then make the appropriate conclusions...
Work devices strongly depends on the person.for tests need a "reference man" and each time one initial condition, where to get?. With 3.0, this is especially essential. I am not against tests, but I myself can not imagine exactly how much time is needed for integration with the 3.0 is sufficient and it can be months(in other cases, years). This is basically a slightly different algorithm of interaction with the world.I hope that making light or buying it all understand it and are guided by your feelings from the Lite version.It is obvious that it is not 2.x and the difference between wearing here will be very much higher.
Ie what is there to measure the result is not clear. If 2.x total trend versions can be traced in most, with a 3.0 in the first bright days have spread, even among people "trained". moreover, this variation does not mean that someone gets a better or worse, and mean are all different.
I would not refuse to obtain a measure of the activity of the manifestations of 3.0, I just don't know how. The idea is to measure the upper part of the spectrum. On GDV the average person is likely to be offset in a different spectrum. Ie, either the measurement range of the image "lose weight" or on the chakras, the offset is formed up. And then not index (person need to measure), only a check box.
Ie what is there to measure the result is not clear. If 2.x total trend versions can be traced in most, with a 3.0 in the first bright days have spread, even among people "trained". moreover, this variation does not mean that someone gets a better or worse, and mean are all different.
I would not refuse to obtain a measure of the activity of the manifestations of 3.0, I just don't know how. The idea is to measure the upper part of the spectrum. On GDV the average person is likely to be offset in a different spectrum. Ie, either the measurement range of the image "lose weight" or on the chakras, the offset is formed up. And then not index (person need to measure), only a check box.
-
Просто_идущий
- Posts:111
- Joined:Wed Mar 04, 2009 13:31
Listen to around the clock via СК1М+SP (a shelf via splitter). Alternate V1,V2,V3 with the Standard. Each heard in their own way!Маг.нет wrote:"Look here," V1, V2 - are there any associations?Просто_идущий wrote:Painted letters on the hand!
The noise in my head (I have her energy, so I hear!) it seems to have become louder.
Now, I , version 3.0!
Sincerely, MAG.no
2.0 not only additional properties from KO, but a more uniform distribution of energy + gain modules via KO.Маг.нет wrote: Noticeable differences 1.0-2.0-3.0 and their rulers.
2.0 system is similar to 1.0 + FOR (additional properties).
2.x - enhanced manifestation of the particulars of the common 2.0
3.0 - a new system (another aspect of energy)
3.0 C ++ (...x2)- reinforcement LEARNING signal of the interaction of the cocoon with this aspect.
It is possible for 3.0 - 3S++ the same time "learning" cocoon to use this kind of aspect of the various energies, increasing the dimensionality of time in the training range? With 3.0 coming out there same as 3S++ only faster?
1.0 the problem is that if some tasks need a lot of energy, then you need to put 1.0 on just (to charge the tight clothes in fact and so on), because through 1-4-8 bracelets on his hands standing, in contact with skin cocoon, can climb only a number to a certain limit.
2.x not so much the manifestation of the particulars, how much the taking of a person in this state that teaches it, training is not developed aspects of personality.
3.0 the growth of podgorci is the total capacity of the subject.
In S++ is added, the purity of the tuning fork due to the coating, ie a quality parameter.
In other words, the assumption about learning speed and possibly true (I'm not sure, do not know is not true), but yet the cocoon can not spend a lot of energy, he pulls it with 3.0 and there rests in the potential of bracelet, yet personal able to support it.
Ie poderei, the greater the opportunity to change themselves and the world before opportunity became a personal quality. Maybe it accelerates the learning, but only to a certain limit, above which is the overload.
1. the mass has, but not you need extreme. Start with a small.Воффка wrote:Michael_
Has-if the value of 3.0 for the physical mass of the bracelet? There is a large workpiece, there is a little. Little easier
What if you charge the beads, will change the impact and if so in what direction? Those same questions to if charge the beads and wear them on your head?
There, a feedback charge 3.0 other items, glasses, belts, etc. On how much it is advisable to do this?
2. beads worse - immediately give the signal for the upper chakras, better bracelet, the beads can then, when the cocoon becomes accustomed to this condition.
3. don't know, I think would be local RF mode - not good for the cocoon.
sunglasses belts and so on - that version is very young
his gave her all to yourself chased longer.
-
Новик
Michael_
We need not "reference man" and "benchmark" or effect, the ability, etc
And people, people are different here agree one turns out a lot of that udruga not very but the key moment that TURNS out.
The thought came not just, not long ago was at a seminar at BI(Aikido)
Smart guys after practice began to discuss the theory, methods, etc so all ended so that any method should be confirmed only through repeated practice and play ye(practices) different people... if this is not the method generally disappears with the death of its founder...
PS.
On the forum section to do a WORKSHOP
For some reason I look at it differently....the Operation of the devices strongly depends on the person.for tests need a "reference man" and each time one initial condition, where to get?.
We need not "reference man" and "benchmark" or effect, the ability, etc
And people, people are different here agree one turns out a lot of that udruga not very but the key moment that TURNS out.
The thought came not just, not long ago was at a seminar at BI(Aikido)
Smart guys after practice began to discuss the theory, methods, etc so all ended so that any method should be confirmed only through repeated practice and play ye(practices) different people... if this is not the method generally disappears with the death of its founder...
PS.
On the forum section to do a WORKSHOP
Yes, I am guided by multiple evidence (see reviews use), but we are in a certain area, where a strong impact is psychological (many all breaks down as soon as it comes to experiment with the knowledge that the result acquires the status of "importance" - is a violation of the basic guidelines.)
So the test should be simplified and depersonalized. Is - computer, with the previous standard terms of relaxation, questioning and repetition, then it will be correctly and accurately, although still a test and life is very different from each other.
Pilarikova somewhere there is a video of their operators, which could have a greater impact on the device and they tell us about it and about how their ability sometimes swim from time to time.
From the producers of "Shiva" and other magnetic stimulators also have some observations on the influence of external factors.
I have one too.... and psychological I put in greater degree of importance than the physical (or natural).
Therefore, the problem is when the correct decision is quite complex and requires a scientific and structured approach. However, the theme itself is not subject to this treatment. The less people engaged in "learning" works for him or not, the more it just makes, the higher your score and faster frequency. Work on the tests, the audience, and so on - makes it worse because of the psychological components. Or even due to the fact that in the world of man inserted the concept of "experience" implies a different possible outcome, and you need to was meant only to correct (desired to him).
So the test should be simple and absolutely untethered + short-lived.
Actually something that can be done on the same psyleron and not only that, but this is a separate issue, which takes time and there is need to restructure some things, or will not test, and profanity.
So the test should be simplified and depersonalized. Is - computer, with the previous standard terms of relaxation, questioning and repetition, then it will be correctly and accurately, although still a test and life is very different from each other.
Pilarikova somewhere there is a video of their operators, which could have a greater impact on the device and they tell us about it and about how their ability sometimes swim from time to time.
From the producers of "Shiva" and other magnetic stimulators also have some observations on the influence of external factors.
I have one too.... and psychological I put in greater degree of importance than the physical (or natural).
Therefore, the problem is when the correct decision is quite complex and requires a scientific and structured approach. However, the theme itself is not subject to this treatment. The less people engaged in "learning" works for him or not, the more it just makes, the higher your score and faster frequency. Work on the tests, the audience, and so on - makes it worse because of the psychological components. Or even due to the fact that in the world of man inserted the concept of "experience" implies a different possible outcome, and you need to was meant only to correct (desired to him).
So the test should be simple and absolutely untethered + short-lived.
Actually something that can be done on the same psyleron and not only that, but this is a separate issue, which takes time and there is need to restructure some things, or will not test, and profanity.
That is, resonates V1, V2 with 3.0 energosaving (the point of application of energy)?Михаил_ wrote:well, if the HF state is Agni and about, and it stimulates 3.0, and V1-2 it develop in the aspect of perception, it turns out that is the manifestation of the activity of one energozone in humans.
Sincerely, MAG.no
I also thought something similar to V1. In an hour somewhere on this condition, remove the bracelet passes.Маг.нет wrote: In their own way, I mean more... Giving BJ 3.0 "heard" the familiar, if V1 and V2 are the details of the channel. Maybe "glitch" here and have a question...
Even somehow suspiciously quickly the situation in a favorable direction moved, the impetus may have been 3.0, but before that was applied a lot of modules 
well, plus Svetlitsa good I guess. http://www.mindmachine.ru/viewtopic.php ... &&start=75
V1
Sincerely, MAG.no
V1
Many similarities and 3.0...Маг.нет wrote:Observations of the second day. I like it, it seems even better to understand it. To describe as it is difficult, but start noting some points of course while "in General", a new designation - "sobriety" through it and the clarity and precision of thought. Concentration-deconcentration, don't know how to identify what is not annoying (not distracting) focus on the "total picture", where there is no background, there's all the details, but about them as soon as you know they are not concentrated at all. The as smooth, well at least I was so. Decided to "play" with the sense of time and just as it is clearly (and fully consciously controlled) it worked, distinguishes clarity.
Sincerely, MAG.no