Карил wrote:Michael_
I know how the computers are arranged at a low level, that is, how they actually work. And perhaps that is why I can not understand. How does your SK?
I'm also not bad with low level device computers....
Then it will be easier to understand a number of explanations.
You can lay a sequence of actions, even complex ones, in a simple thought form, if you make it high. Ie if the person generates thought on the level of Intrusive thoughts (often of desires, fears, complexes), it turns out the parasite. Vampiresa thought, which came out "accidentally", the only thing she knows how to arouse this obsession and the energy of fear or other feelings with her man linked to eat... and these parasites can goes to offline mode and change the owner.
If the frequency of creation (and consciousness ) is high, then working out the algorithm pogibali in their area of the world for themselves. A local modifier. Sometimes it is very effective and therefore widely used from ancient times (in the same area of different wards, etc.), but sometimes is not very harmonious from the point of view of work processes with the world, ie is a rather drastic solution - just a runny nose, it's time to cut the head.
There are two cases when you can just constraits with the model solution algorithm is acquired if its aggregor (and many have been) and we take it can not modifying. And the second option - if it is like the story in the Central library in the world - ie it is not the egregore, and the EXPERIENCE of the world. Above I gave examples of the importance of the interactions of personal experience, and have experience the other side of the world in which we find ourselves.
Setting the experience of the world allows to "play" certain algorithms are taking them from an external library and not wasting time and effort for their creation and as thought forms and charging energy (because of the high frequency thought-form energies above the majority of people, in the process, unlike the larva, they do not eat energy, but they themselves are spent, unless provided for their nourishment).
Thus, by creating a resonance with an external library - experience of the world, we do not make a dissonance in the local curvature (as in the case of deformation due to the impact of Autonomous thought forms), but we get a working algorithm, which is akin to a simple program.
I think this part is clear?
So, in principle, extensions in BJ.
A broadly similar principle, as I understand it, and use a chamber. (they only have the conditions and facilities for resonance are constructed differently). What about a chamber can not say for sure (need time to review, and he's always out), but in General I think the principle is clear.
Now what SK is a set of algorithms, and running programs. Algorithms is the basis - for example see the cause of the disharmony of the interaction of man-world is like one subtraction - calculation of the difference in the system, which is not enough to ensure that the amount was harmonious. This kind of module seems to resonate with this algorithm in the world can say the quality of the world.
And besides there is a simple front-end add-ons, but very effective. They are made on the same cell the cloud. Cell cloud is also the program. Tricky.
It consists of microchips, from the "cells". Cells in the body are able to work in collaboration (unified algorithm) and to specialize (information storage, recharge energy, and so on) Can be divided and raznositsya... only they are not physical, but energy, as high frequency thought forms. but they do not have to create as they are made manifest as a feature of the world. Ie is also taken by resonance with the planet. Firstly because this principle is in all living objects. Secondly because a little of it added for this use and made it a planetary experience, giving it a certain weight and history.
It is these cells and made the interface and sealing performance of the algorithms BJ older versions of SK.
in principle, to (cellular cloud) this is a simple program written in the cells. And every cell for the electronics can be represented as a microchip with a complete set of functions - short and long term memory, a set of interfaces, the set of types of supply, basic algorithms in microcode, a set of algorithms for operation of the cell together, and of reproduction, and so on.
The only difference is that the cells - not microchips, they are not man-made, and taken as a principle of living. Therefore it is impossible to write some kind of disharmonious and generally sucks the algorithm - it will be rejected by the biosphere and just not start. This simultaneously limits the functionality and perfectly insures against errors and left application. In addition, the cells implemented access authorization - by default the Creator of the program, passing on part of the functions (configurable) of the user.
Due to this, the interface IC is protected from influences of random leftist who has seen the device.
Well, if you just take his ability to calculate, the second question is whether it is reasonable? In the Chronicles Zelazny was one very interesting device.
Yes.... a very interesting device....
no, SK do, insurance is not reasonable, it is slightly symbiotically as any bracelet, and the fact that this bracelet is not - there is a direct and not a complex program made to "cells".
And as a joke. You've left to do speaking of the UK?
![Smile :)](./images/smilies/icon_smile.gif)
Will doshutilis
![Smile :)](./images/smilies/icon_smile.gif)
There is no problem to do the talking IC. Purely technical problems, but they are weak and rest rather during the design process of the system of words and symbols.
The problem is the operator who needs to hear through a direct channel, not through hearing. (or to see).
The bracelets version 2.0 and higher there seems to be two or three modules, the description of which I post only in the closed part, they only work for older versions and are associated with the interface just.... today I will correct this error, post in the public section. There in particular, there is a virtual screen on the right and left extreme fields of view, where sometimes translated straight marks "the right way(choices) and bad way(choice)." This screen is how it works, but not quite clearly. When I think about it and start to use it - it becomes more visible. And sound or video - not much difference.<