New product of isn-1 is a modification of the BZ.
- Мастер ДАО
- Posts:136
- Joined:Tue Aug 03, 2010 17:11
All the good time. Here I suffered the same story as some others. My IIM-1 krupno or if you want cracked. and as well as respected Ignatius-and. exactly orbit spherical surface of the device body, and a radial vertical fracture of the circle cracked up. and in the most interesting circumstances. here is a detailed observation. when he was two days ago 7 th Feb, felt a great fatigue. but work still had much. my Sri was always on my desktop. in the field of view, and that is to say just warmed the soul with his presence. sometimes for 3-5 minutes, took it in his arms as if a little bit of him "warming up". and then slightly. as vesch glass,though filled with dense then treated with an extreme degree of caution. well. that evening I took him in hand with a particular attitude, a desire to restore his energy. not fanatical but clear. turning and tuning already using a small amount of minutes he felt his personal characteristics-the sensations in the body including th that energy crept up so to speak. what I actually needed from him,of the device. the session consisted in holding the device in two hands at a time with a small applying it sometimes to the head near the center of the forehead,inner feelings and how to be an intuitive sense-desire. and after about 10 minutes, I suddenly felt felt literally skin of the palms crackling,brittle and unpleasant. hands gently step back and see how literally in the face in the hands of the glass runs crack. just as 5-7 millimeters from the boundaries separating media of different composition of the fill tool. and the vertical went up smoothly from the center part of the ball surface which was definitely the point in the center of the left palm. even more cautiously I put Sri in front of him and continued observation of his behavior. within approximately 4-6 minutes, the device crackled as if he calmed down and seemed slightly decreased in size. well, it certainly is a purely subjective experience. then after a thorough analysis of the surface, I clearly felt prepodavala about a third of a millimeter(maybe less but still noticeable) edge of the crack. but not movable, but stable and. will share some more thoughts. and it's not just a beautiful phrase. for two hours prior to the session to work with the device I have clearly formed a picture and a vision of what I need to take a picture of your isn because it can either change or groupnote. to fix this, change it before and after so to speak. but I stress. their not my thoughts I have long been accustomed to and know how to weed out and distinguish yourself. the idea was NOT MINE. this in order to cut off possible idea what type he thought he got. not my idea it was. just came as Information. but because the state and my state of health was not the best for this(well, much was tired and weak), I just it all noted and recorded in the memory, and started to work with the device. and got the output here's an interesting result. do not argue,he helped me very much,but the device itself has groupno. and it did not disappoint. of course the idea and the meaning it can not affect the functionality of it,but aesthetically and practically unfortunately
it became less convenient to work with. I certainly have some thoughts and reflections on the causality of this behavior of the device,but so far they are buggy and I will hold back until the future times. such are the observations... Your Master DAO.
<
IIM-2, as is known from the description above, is a ball coated with 3D-engraving inside (the experimental sample was in the photo somewhere).
We analyzed the possibility of manufacturing ultra-large structural elements also in the glass with the same engraved.
If the standard "ball" of the ISS-2 has a diameter of 100-110, it is technically possible to make a "prefabricated" IIM-2B (big), where the same figure will be implemented in a cube with edge 30cm (i.e. 300х300х300), but the cube "folding" of the individual layers (300х300х100), or, more likely (the WEIGHTS of important parts of the product + the availability of the blanks at the manufacturing) of 9 bars 100х100х300
The estimated cost of such macro-Iim, and that can come in handy somewhere in a large office space (e.g. conference room, large conference room, etc.) about 100 000
Manufacture - to-order about two weeks (with the right amount of ACC. blanks from the manufacturer, or maybe longer). Maybe later will post a sample in the office.
to be clear my comment above on the topic of mass - 300х300х300 cube will have a weight of about 90kg, so a solid type not only is it technologically not possible yet (camera laser has limitations on the size, we use a unique unit with a particularly high resolution), but by weight it would be overly complex (transportation and other aspects), so a team of design, may not be so beautiful from the point of view of design(appearance) of the total assembled structure, it is preferable in all respects.
We analyzed the possibility of manufacturing ultra-large structural elements also in the glass with the same engraved.
If the standard "ball" of the ISS-2 has a diameter of 100-110, it is technically possible to make a "prefabricated" IIM-2B (big), where the same figure will be implemented in a cube with edge 30cm (i.e. 300х300х300), but the cube "folding" of the individual layers (300х300х100), or, more likely (the WEIGHTS of important parts of the product + the availability of the blanks at the manufacturing) of 9 bars 100х100х300
The estimated cost of such macro-Iim, and that can come in handy somewhere in a large office space (e.g. conference room, large conference room, etc.) about 100 000
Manufacture - to-order about two weeks (with the right amount of ACC. blanks from the manufacturer, or maybe longer). Maybe later will post a sample in the office.
to be clear my comment above on the topic of mass - 300х300х300 cube will have a weight of about 90kg, so a solid type not only is it technologically not possible yet (camera laser has limitations on the size, we use a unique unit with a particularly high resolution), but by weight it would be overly complex (transportation and other aspects), so a team of design, may not be so beautiful from the point of view of design(appearance) of the total assembled structure, it is preferable in all respects.

Today there was a "confidential" conversation with a partner at work. Earlier I mentioned about moving on I vector of the "center of life" company, what is "strange":) by the way, but it can rather be attributed to other factors. But here's another observation, which gave reason to reflect on this subject I refer to the positive activities of Sri. Have it on your desktop "was removed from the eye."
My partners have noticed that in the last 3-4 months (more precisely from November) how weird:) the way the activity of the company and physically moved into my office. First Director of the founder more often (earlier than usual) under various pretexts began to come (everyone has their cozy nest), and since November, more than 70% of the time carried out in my office. It already began to notice and other employees of the company that these figures easier to find me, often working meetings and discussions began to take place in my office, Oh Yes there is, and always delicious water 1.0 L
Can certainly I isn
Sincerely, MAG.no<
We must understand that all products complement each other, so I think using isn it locally and vividly manifested the amplifier, ск1м (with very large RF prefix) and the stabilizer and a bit of his bracelets.... ie is just a local place display it all... besides all this coming not even have the thought that they SHOULD get a decision guaranteed a certain device, they just noted the pattern, so the quality of "letting go" of the situation they have a very good... for them it is intuitive hike, or, if conscious, kind of "shamanism". That's all it is - a mass of connected devices + and I think a little operator influence, which may push the situation after listening to it, + a local manifestation of isn + their intuitive approach - it gives such a good result. Combined.
In this important reasonable grain, nobody even thought to expect the accomplishment was no consciousness, just vygovarival let go of thought and... in a way... she is such an approach, not a long time coming, here and results.Михаил_ wrote:besides all this coming not even have the thought that they SHOULD get a decision guaranteed a certain device, they just noted the pattern, so the quality of "letting go" of the situation they have a very good... for them it is intuitive hike, or, if conscious, kind of "shamanism".
Well, I think that paying attention to high performance achievements, "test of strength achievements" - can decrease effectiveness. So I keep quiet about the reasons of such consequences, high as well in surprise saying, "can't be", because more important than the result, and not knowing why.
Sincerely, MAG.no
- Андрей Кабанков
- Автор сайта
- Posts:3875
- Joined:Fri Mar 31, 2006 8:19
- Has thanked: 1 time
- Been thanked: 182 times
Looked potentila of ISS-2. More powerful isn-1 definitely Came to work ,something Glova plague, apparently with sudden climate changes,held the ball in his hands for about 10 minutes.Feel better much.With so much energy that palm spatele that generally is rare for me. Became a gentle,even too much,which is not very comfortable when the propeller is in one place
And tried to view the internal view,the funny thing is a big ball a silvery - white ,and from the antenna in all directions(of the type disclosed umbrella) clockwise Rotation of these arrows rays .Visualize yourself on the left side of the beam for me .Presented to the right is the beam after me again. Checked-if I'm not around ,but conceived myself energeticheskuyu recharge,then I'll make her feel? It turned out that the beam as a bridge between me and the ball. Pleased that it is not necessary to carry or keep very close to myself ,while working in the office anywhere still charging.
And tried to view the internal view,the funny thing is a big ball a silvery - white ,and from the antenna in all directions(of the type disclosed umbrella) clockwise Rotation of these arrows rays .Visualize yourself on the left side of the beam for me .Presented to the right is the beam after me again. Checked-if I'm not around ,but conceived myself energeticheskuyu recharge,then I'll make her feel? It turned out that the beam as a bridge between me and the ball. Pleased that it is not necessary to carry or keep very close to myself ,while working in the office anywhere still charging.
The main differences in objectives and points of application.
the point of application:
Isn (great BJ 2.6-2.7-2.8) is an integrated energy Operator inside the cocoon.
SK (BJ-integrated Operator) - "close" the energy environment of the Operator (from the outside, but very close) - front interaction on the boundary of the cocoon.
I.e., the interaction with the Operator of isn - directly, SK - via "place" (the surrounding space).
Task:
IIM - feeding the BZ Operator (well and accordingly the Operator).
SK - a systematic correction in energy (quality) in the close environment of the Operator (and thereby including more "careful" consumption of own energy Operator).
I.e. the problem is solved isn - the same as BJ, SC - work with a "site" (the environment) and through it with the Operator.
There are of course some differences, but they are in my opinion not as significant in the reflection of the interaction of the BZ, SK and the Operator.
Pro 2 isn't know and while I think it's best to wait a full User Reviews...
Personally I'm not in a hurry ("Before Friday I'm completely free!.."©)
© "WithaboutuWmhavelstfandlsm". Piglet, "Winnie the Pooh goes visiting".
Sincerely, MAG.no<
the point of application:
Isn (great BJ 2.6-2.7-2.8) is an integrated energy Operator inside the cocoon.
SK (BJ-integrated Operator) - "close" the energy environment of the Operator (from the outside, but very close) - front interaction on the boundary of the cocoon.
I.e., the interaction with the Operator of isn - directly, SK - via "place" (the surrounding space).
Task:
IIM - feeding the BZ Operator (well and accordingly the Operator).
SK - a systematic correction in energy (quality) in the close environment of the Operator (and thereby including more "careful" consumption of own energy Operator).
I.e. the problem is solved isn - the same as BJ, SC - work with a "site" (the environment) and through it with the Operator.
There are of course some differences, but they are in my opinion not as significant in the reflection of the interaction of the BZ, SK and the Operator.
Pro 2 isn't know and while I think it's best to wait a full User Reviews...
Personally I'm not in a hurry ("Before Friday I'm completely free!.."©)
© "WithaboutuWmhavelstfandlsm". Piglet, "Winnie the Pooh goes visiting".
Sincerely, MAG.no<
...and BJ is always in the cocoon (when dressed), IIM - Operator interaction through BJ (remote) when the direct (ISB cocoon) - intensity due to the significant massМаг.нет wrote:i.e., the interaction with the Operator of isn - directly, SK - via "place" (the surrounding space).
and diversity "shifts" (2.6-2.7-2.8) compared to a bracelet/bracelets BJ.
Sincerely, MAG.no
SK - a device for complex algorithmic influences (prolonged in time) defined through direct mental programming, stage or audio.
SK is doing something that might make You working on a certain task in an altered state of consciousness for a long time, without interruption and with the ability to find specific new ways of implementing events. In addition, the IC contains a bunch of extra f-functions (work with indoor, water, special audio, reproduction information, etc.).
BJ works with the operator in real time and not stuck on one task. Different quality of the different versions give you the opportunity to educate themselves and different ways to approach the same situations through the different qualities. They are to set their minds, having different capabilities, different experiences and different paths.
The IIM was originally conceived as a table object. BJ large and on the table.... do not carry the variant. Since all BJ 2.0-2.x are integrated into a single system, and the ISS too. In direct tactile contact, or the location of the work power of these institutions is higher than remote.
IIM-2 has more power, more gift and respectable, and a bit of advanced functionality.
In IIM-2 in addition to the base system 2.0 and qualities 2.6-2.7-2.8 there's a quality of 2.5, the module mixing different qualities and in this situation, proportions and integration with the AU and the system is "tops" in addition to applied as well as in U2.
Due suvenirnoe appearance, ИСН2 maybe easier to "donated" to someone without much explanation what it is.
In addition, further sales will be a stand with led lights under it (auto-rotation and color change), now just these coasters out of town (from a wholesaler, they are common to a large series of typical 3D shapes).
SK is doing something that might make You working on a certain task in an altered state of consciousness for a long time, without interruption and with the ability to find specific new ways of implementing events. In addition, the IC contains a bunch of extra f-functions (work with indoor, water, special audio, reproduction information, etc.).
BJ works with the operator in real time and not stuck on one task. Different quality of the different versions give you the opportunity to educate themselves and different ways to approach the same situations through the different qualities. They are to set their minds, having different capabilities, different experiences and different paths.
The IIM was originally conceived as a table object. BJ large and on the table.... do not carry the variant. Since all BJ 2.0-2.x are integrated into a single system, and the ISS too. In direct tactile contact, or the location of the work power of these institutions is higher than remote.
IIM-2 has more power, more gift and respectable, and a bit of advanced functionality.
In IIM-2 in addition to the base system 2.0 and qualities 2.6-2.7-2.8 there's a quality of 2.5, the module mixing different qualities and in this situation, proportions and integration with the AU and the system is "tops" in addition to applied as well as in U2.
Due suvenirnoe appearance, ИСН2 maybe easier to "donated" to someone without much explanation what it is.
In addition, further sales will be a stand with led lights under it (auto-rotation and color change), now just these coasters out of town (from a wholesaler, they are common to a large series of typical 3D shapes).
1.If someone throw something breaks someone .... be careful, that is.
Seriously - I don't know. It is a glass. It's durable, but like any similar object (e.g. if the balloon were made of stone), can be broken by such a blow (from the table) but maybe not... probably depends from many factors, including chance and the material of the floor...
Better not to drop.
For three-dimensional engraving is the serial of the workpiece is used everywhere (probably about the same manufacturer). I know nothing about their "fragility".
Seriously - I don't know. It is a glass. It's durable, but like any similar object (e.g. if the balloon were made of stone), can be broken by such a blow (from the table) but maybe not... probably depends from many factors, including chance and the material of the floor...
Better not to drop.
For three-dimensional engraving is the serial of the workpiece is used everywhere (probably about the same manufacturer). I know nothing about their "fragility".
It's all "cleverly".Воффка wrote:I understand that to obtain quality 2.8 is not necessarily the presence of the material from which made RF console and a bracelet 2.8? This material is also present in ИСН2?
The materials used for 2.7 and 2.8 direct replacement does not have. IIM-2 has unique features not comparable to IIM-1, in particular, advanced functionality and properties 2.5. The power large.
But all the properties 2.x ИСН2, relatively speaking, more "synthetic" than the real material (RF layer in ИСН1, bracelet 2.
Because ИСН2 not the bracelet on the arm, the subject -a source of energy, it is a "synthetic" with more power and very desktop view - not a hindrance. And for carrying the 2.8 is better...
2.8 real material that is present in the stabilizer, ИСН1, RF console, glass ball is not replaced. But the balloon pros are not a substitute for even a basin with HF....
Availability of different options creates the possibility of choice.
I have relatives already in the queue stood for "ball" - say on the desktop is very convenient that asking questions was not more a gift than have ИСН1, table good piece of furniture does not create too much attention. Roll it on the floor - no need
Quality 2.x implemented "programmatically", or more precisely the charging-functional system, stitched into a ball. And ИСН1 regular link bracelet 2.6 without the extended f-functions.
Thus ИСН2 a little closer to the UK or Amplifier (although not the power as the Amplifier), but still the functionality is not the UK, and your. For operational energy consumption.
ИСН2 - more powerful than ИСН1, have their own features. For most consumers of SK (when you select one of two) - definitely preferable.... but if the free opportunity is a good extension for the table head (for example) and to strengthen the ENTIRE complex of the BZ. ИСН2 work in its a little unique, not like other products.<
According to the results of the comparison activity ИСН1-ИСН2 in particular came to the conclusion (perhaps slightly prior):
1. исн1 gives a very "natural" energy, works locally with the operator, for good contact need to take up.
2. исн2 works perfectly on the room (better than исн1), more powerful than himself (very important), very good to limit the areas of the workplace operator. Cons - harder working, energopodachi slightly different shade from исн1, however there is a quality of 2.5.
Overall исн2 reasonably good as harmonizer of space and as an amplifier of the BZ operator. ИСН1 - like soft and very natural source of the energy in the room works too, but not as effective as the second version.
1. исн1 gives a very "natural" energy, works locally with the operator, for good contact need to take up.
2. исн2 works perfectly on the room (better than исн1), more powerful than himself (very important), very good to limit the areas of the workplace operator. Cons - harder working, energopodachi slightly different shade from исн1, however there is a quality of 2.5.
Overall исн2 reasonably good as harmonizer of space and as an amplifier of the BZ operator. ИСН1 - like soft and very natural source of the energy in the room works too, but not as effective as the second version.
