Discussion broadcast. Reviews.
Discussion broadcast. Reviews.
Well, actually it is more a question of Xenia, as the female part of the broadcast cards were written to her... but I did for clarification I asked... her opinion is that if you want to explore the female aspects of it, but it is more of a women's broadcast. Nothing bad will happen whether it is appropriate to decide for himself. Card many people use both... I mean there are options and wrote about it.ЛайфОператор wrote: ↑Wed Nov 21, 2018 23:19Michael, Hello!
The list of broadcasts are broadcast female "Beauty, harmony, abundance" and "In truth." But judging by the description, they may come and men:) Especially if we remember that men have feminine (female aspects). Makes sense and use a man to connect these women's broadcast?
-
- Posts:46
- Joined:Sat Oct 27, 2018 2:26
- Has thanked: 27 times
- Been thanked: 14 times
Discussion broadcast. Reviews.
Michael, Hello!
There is a sense to use to connect the stream of the "True view" without physical Pandora and/or physical BJ? (BZ 2.4 is now).
There is a sense to use to connect the stream of the "True view" without physical Pandora and/or physical BJ? (BZ 2.4 is now).
-
- Posts:308
- Joined:Thu Aug 05, 2010 21:43
- Has thanked: 19 times
- Been thanked: 34 times
Discussion broadcast. Reviews.
Has. Translational 2.4 completely replace the physical product.
Discussion broadcast. Reviews.
Quite a self stream
And Pandora, if you want, can be a good idea to make homemade black: see diys on my site, and the time it should be not so many, but again - the stream is self-sufficient.
And Pandora, if you want, can be a good idea to make homemade black: see diys on my site, and the time it should be not so many, but again - the stream is self-sufficient.
Discussion broadcast. Reviews.
And as correctly noted by Vladimir S., translational BJ fully equivalent to the physical hardware.
-
- Posts:46
- Joined:Sat Oct 27, 2018 2:26
- Has thanked: 27 times
- Been thanked: 14 times
Discussion broadcast. Reviews.
Michael, I read both forums, but there were some obscure questions on the use of modifiers:
1. You recommended in one of the messages periodically to change 6 and 7 mode (through the chaos to work through what is not worked through in order and Vice versa). How to connect 5 mode (detailed) at long term broadcast? For example, if I broadcast a 2 year broadcast in shift schedule 1,2,3,4,6 and 1,2,3,4,7 there is a sense and a need to mode 5? The goal is better uptake of translation and consolidation of the cocoon. That is, the duration of the study compensates for the lack of detail?
2. And the other question. If I broadcast a 2 year broadcast in 1,2,3,4,5 it makes sense, and the need to connect 6 and 7 mode? (if the rate of absorption is not important and the main goal is to qualitatively register the property in the cocoon?)
It is clear that everything is very individual...but it would be as a guide to know some average values.
I would be grateful if experienced users broadcasts will also share my opinion:)
1. You recommended in one of the messages periodically to change 6 and 7 mode (through the chaos to work through what is not worked through in order and Vice versa). How to connect 5 mode (detailed) at long term broadcast? For example, if I broadcast a 2 year broadcast in shift schedule 1,2,3,4,6 and 1,2,3,4,7 there is a sense and a need to mode 5? The goal is better uptake of translation and consolidation of the cocoon. That is, the duration of the study compensates for the lack of detail?
2. And the other question. If I broadcast a 2 year broadcast in 1,2,3,4,5 it makes sense, and the need to connect 6 and 7 mode? (if the rate of absorption is not important and the main goal is to qualitatively register the property in the cocoon?)
It is clear that everything is very individual...but it would be as a guide to know some average values.
I would be grateful if experienced users broadcasts will also share my opinion:)
-
- Posts:46
- Joined:Sat Oct 27, 2018 2:26
- Has thanked: 27 times
- Been thanked: 14 times
Discussion broadcast. Reviews.
And another question. What mode is more powerful and strong: 1,2,3,4,5 or 1,2,3,4,6 ? (of course, in average).
-
- Posts:308
- Joined:Thu Aug 05, 2010 21:43
- Has thanked: 19 times
- Been thanked: 34 times
Discussion broadcast. Reviews.
A philosophical question, and, IMHO, the correct answer can not be.
5th eats a lot of computer resources, so it is so expensive. 6th may be (or may not!) subjectively stressful, so it's a lot of caveats.
The modern version of the personal account interface allows you to switch modes instantly - try for yourself which combination is for You will be optimal.
Maybe if you want power, take 1234 and stereo continue to watch? Wait a week or two, evaluate the effects diminished/added..
The issue of the comparison of power options broadcast involves the need for objective measurement; what to measure?
In CT*CH3/h? (telotroch per person per hour)
Try for yourself and You will succeed! )
5th eats a lot of computer resources, so it is so expensive. 6th may be (or may not!) subjectively stressful, so it's a lot of caveats.
The modern version of the personal account interface allows you to switch modes instantly - try for yourself which combination is for You will be optimal.
Maybe if you want power, take 1234 and stereo continue to watch? Wait a week or two, evaluate the effects diminished/added..
The issue of the comparison of power options broadcast involves the need for objective measurement; what to measure?
In CT*CH3/h? (telotroch per person per hour)
Try for yourself and You will succeed! )
-
- Posts:308
- Joined:Thu Aug 05, 2010 21:43
- Has thanked: 19 times
- Been thanked: 34 times
Discussion broadcast. Reviews.
PS. about the detail - ALL modifiers to provide detail sufficient for assimilation. Increased modifiers will only speed (absorbed faster) and appearance at the moment (I need right now on the situation, I 2.6 123457стерео included). The final mastering will be good in any case. No that's not necessary to include the 5th. I won a Panacea for 1.5 years without a 5th aired and nothing has registered.
-
- Posts:46
- Joined:Sat Oct 27, 2018 2:26
- Has thanked: 27 times
- Been thanked: 14 times
Discussion broadcast. Reviews.
Vladimir S.thanks for sharing your experience! Know on both forums that You are an experienced practitioner broadcasts:)
I am now actively experimenting with modes. Today decided to do some experiments, see what happens. In General, while flying is great:)
I am now actively experimenting with modes. Today decided to do some experiments, see what happens. In General, while flying is great:)
-
- Posts:46
- Joined:Sat Oct 27, 2018 2:26
- Has thanked: 27 times
- Been thanked: 14 times
Discussion broadcast. Reviews.
Vladimir, and you feel how much more powerful 1234+1234 than just stereo? And 1234+stereo is more powerful than 12347?
-
- Posts:46
- Joined:Sat Oct 27, 2018 2:26
- Has thanked: 27 times
- Been thanked: 14 times
Discussion broadcast. Reviews.
Vladimir, correctly understood, that on average for 2 years, you can expect the stream to assimilate in the mode 1234? (I call it basic:)), without any 5,6,7?Владимир Ш. wrote: ↑Sat Dec 01, 2018 20:13PS. about the detail - ALL modifiers to provide detail sufficient for assimilation.
-
- Posts:308
- Joined:Thu Aug 05, 2010 21:43
- Has thanked: 19 times
- Been thanked: 34 times
Discussion broadcast. Reviews.
Price for machine time in stereo increases 2 times, the power (IMHO) - much more than in 2 times. Well, there is a transition from quantity to quality and all that )ЛайфОператор wrote: ↑Sat Dec 01, 2018 20:45Vladimir, and you feel how much more powerful 1234+1234 than just stereo? And 1234+stereo is more powerful than 12347?
7 can not compare, they are not comparable, sorry )
Yes, and the evidence for this mass. But! All individually, you know )ЛайфОператор wrote: ↑Sat Dec 01, 2018 20:48Vladimir, correctly understood, that on average for 2 years, you can expect the stream to assimilate in the mode 1234? (I call it basic:)), without any 5,6,7?
-
- Posts:46
- Joined:Sat Oct 27, 2018 2:26
- Has thanked: 27 times
- Been thanked: 14 times
Discussion broadcast. Reviews.
Vladimir, and how the feelings this mode?:) And what is the effect of this mode on the event thread (specifically on Your situation)?
Last edited by ЛайфОператор on Sat Dec 01, 2018 22:24, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts:46
- Joined:Sat Oct 27, 2018 2:26
- Has thanked: 27 times
- Been thanked: 14 times
Discussion broadcast. Reviews.
Yes,Vladimir, I understand) thank You again!Владимир Ш. wrote: ↑Sat Dec 01, 2018 21:08Yes, and the evidence for this mass. But! All individually, you know )
-
- Posts:46
- Joined:Sat Oct 27, 2018 2:26
- Has thanked: 27 times
- Been thanked: 14 times
Discussion broadcast. Reviews.
I have just also had a desire to try this mode:) the Only thing that is confusing: how to assess what the cocoon normally metabolizes this mode that the power is not given in vain? If physics sensations are normal and the "event" bounce-no or is it acceptable...is it possible with high probability to assume that the cocoon is normally absorbed this power (the stream normally prescribed)? Or some other criteria is there?
-
- Posts:308
- Joined:Thu Aug 05, 2010 21:43
- Has thanked: 19 times
- Been thanked: 34 times
Discussion broadcast. Reviews.
A little incorrect formulation of the question. The cocoon of the stream to assimilate in any way. Do NOT internalize her he can'T, as ALL broadcast on the mechanism of resonance evoke some aspects that we had originally. It is not something alien that was brought from the outside, but something our native, but very well forgotten.
Therefore, the cocoon absorbs broadcast well IN ANY CASE. The difference in choice of power, in fact, is determined by two factors:
1) Comfortable for us at the moment, with the given set of modifiers for this broadcast. I somewhere already wrote earlier that 3.0, 3.1, 2.7, 2.6, executor, men's broadcast I have 12347 stereo are (or previously were) great and without any side effects. But the Panacea and Infomaniac while trying a tough workout using the Procedure (7 modifier) for a day or two was turning life into Hell
When you replace 7 on the 6th all normalizability literally hours after transfer. ALL INDIVIDUALLY!
2) Well, actually, the financial aspect More power - more expensive payment.
As for feelings I have from 7 regime in my situation - again, IMHO not quite correct to raise this question With stereocameras greatly increased manifestation of the properties of 2.6. Namely, the 7th mode, I did not particularly feel. It is, in fact, is one of the indicators properly running broadcast - when there isn't any bizarre sensations, in addition to those associated with the actual broadcast of the product (in my case 2.6).
By the way, Yes,the situation I worked, and the 5th was off for expensive It was a force majeure, 2.6 worked great, then I will keep 12347 stereo.
Like everyone said )
PS Sometimes there are misunderstandings, let's just clarify, since we're so detail about the modifiers conversation )
It happens that the most powerful and sufficient effects in people have been going from 1234 mono. Sometimes not feeling anything at 12347 stereo and just adding 5ки have some experience.
Both options are neither good nor bad. Both options are normal. Just individual characteristics. It is necessary to choose your option.
Success!<
Therefore, the cocoon absorbs broadcast well IN ANY CASE. The difference in choice of power, in fact, is determined by two factors:
1) Comfortable for us at the moment, with the given set of modifiers for this broadcast. I somewhere already wrote earlier that 3.0, 3.1, 2.7, 2.6, executor, men's broadcast I have 12347 stereo are (or previously were) great and without any side effects. But the Panacea and Infomaniac while trying a tough workout using the Procedure (7 modifier) for a day or two was turning life into Hell
When you replace 7 on the 6th all normalizability literally hours after transfer. ALL INDIVIDUALLY!
2) Well, actually, the financial aspect More power - more expensive payment.
As for feelings I have from 7 regime in my situation - again, IMHO not quite correct to raise this question With stereocameras greatly increased manifestation of the properties of 2.6. Namely, the 7th mode, I did not particularly feel. It is, in fact, is one of the indicators properly running broadcast - when there isn't any bizarre sensations, in addition to those associated with the actual broadcast of the product (in my case 2.6).
By the way, Yes,the situation I worked, and the 5th was off for expensive It was a force majeure, 2.6 worked great, then I will keep 12347 stereo.
Like everyone said )
PS Sometimes there are misunderstandings, let's just clarify, since we're so detail about the modifiers conversation )
It happens that the most powerful and sufficient effects in people have been going from 1234 mono. Sometimes not feeling anything at 12347 stereo and just adding 5ки have some experience.
Both options are neither good nor bad. Both options are normal. Just individual characteristics. It is necessary to choose your option.
Success!<
-
- Posts:46
- Joined:Sat Oct 27, 2018 2:26
- Has thanked: 27 times
- Been thanked: 14 times
Discussion broadcast. Reviews.
Vladimir S.thank you for such a detailed and clear answer! Now the puzzle came together:)
-
- Posts:46
- Joined:Sat Oct 27, 2018 2:26
- Has thanked: 27 times
- Been thanked: 14 times
Discussion broadcast. Reviews.
This, incidentally, is great advice (internal sensations). I was thinking stereo, and then I lost sight of that we should try this mode. At the moment I have tried all the modes, in principle, all the modes are well tolerated. I'll see what effects and feelings will be stereo:)Владимир Ш. wrote: ↑Sat Dec 01, 2018 20:07Maybe if you want power, take 1234 and stereo continue to watch? Wait a week or two, evaluate the effects diminished/added..
Discussion broadcast. Reviews.
Stereo - Yes, it is useful to apply .. who do not have enough piping hot ... I now know the person to whom the X100 is included in the special rate and he is good and the other would be burned nafig....
-
- Posts:46
- Joined:Sat Oct 27, 2018 2:26
- Has thanked: 27 times
- Been thanked: 14 times
Discussion broadcast. Reviews.
Vladimir, a Panacea for 1.5 years was prescribed mode 1,2,3,4,7 stereo?Владимир Ш. wrote: ↑Sat Dec 01, 2018 20:13I won a Panacea for 1.5 years without a 5th aired and nothing has registered.
I'm broadcasting in this mode. The feeling norms. Tried the Mach 5 (1,2,3,4,5,7 stereo) - go hard 10 broadcasts (physical sensations) and expensive decided without 5 key broadcast.
-
- Posts:308
- Joined:Thu Aug 05, 2010 21:43
- Has thanked: 19 times
- Been thanked: 34 times
Discussion broadcast. Reviews.
No, the first year of the broadcasts did not exist neither sevens nor the stereo, so just 12346. And then six months decided the same thing in stereo to drive. 7ku tried, but with Panacea I did not like, so Chaos is everything ))
Discussion broadcast. Reviews.
7ka hard and has a lot of sense but not all and not always. In another case (not here/not publicly available broadcasts) we use the mechanism of switching modes once a week - a week and the other 6, week 7 and other.... nobody complained
-
- Posts:46
- Joined:Sat Oct 27, 2018 2:26
- Has thanked: 27 times
- Been thanked: 14 times
Discussion broadcast. Reviews.
Michael, 8, and 9 mode plan to give to share with regular commercial broadcasts? If Yes, when approximately to wait?