Woof! BU-ha-ha...

[мимоходом]

This is a subjective opinion. Every single opinion is strictly subjective, that is why there is no need to specially designate

[Петя Варежкин]

Oh, I know. The task is also included in the path. Blunted

[Петя Варежкин]

This is a subjective opinion. Every single opinion is strictly subjective, that is why there is no need to specially designate

We started with the fact that all perception is in the head. This is also your subjective opinion?

[Петя Варежкин]

And I wonder what people came up with IMHO?

[мимоходом]

This is also your subjective opinion?

And this is anatomy

[Петя Варежкин]

every single opinion is strictly subjective

Not all - there are still objective.

[мимоходом]

What, for example, opinions are objective?

[Петя Варежкин]

This is also your subjective opinion?

And this is anatomy

So you are saying that I need to do for development, on the basis of objective opinion (of the anatomy), but argue that this view is subjective by definition and to know that we have

[мимоходом]

Beautifully wrapped. Well, something like that, Yes. There are facts and there are interpretations. Any interpretation are cut to the facts with some distortion. For one fact may be many interpretations, some of them are more optimal and less. People expressing an opinion - expresses his or her interpretation (distortion of fact). The other person is listening and understanding - distorts the distortion again, according to his understanding. But in principle, the distortions, if they collect a lot - can be detected and the fact

[Юрий Насонов]

The world is objective, but what we perceive is an illusion

[Петя Варежкин]

Some Jogging on the spot turns. What is all this? For "development"? And it is also in the head? What's the point in everything? Try to understand the incomprehensible in a personal projection? Why do something if it makes no sense, if it is an illusion? Masturbation? It is unclear karoch.

You are absolutely right. From the point of view of logic there is no sense, full of senseless, also came to this conclusion, and all or came or will come, when viewed from the standpoint of logic. Understanding the meaninglessness gives rise to something like despair or depression. And when everything is very dark and meaningless - in the sense - feeling. Not emotions from the heart, and belly, it is possible to Express the word "beauty". It's hard to explain - so women feel (and in turn I can not understand why this logic and digging with the awareness of need).

In General, the point of view of "beauty" - it's not pointless, and Vice versa. But since man is simultaneously both the perception task is to reconcile them, to unite, having received something, yet to me unknown

Well, go ahead. It turns out that all the above written is from the point of view of YOUR logic and "beauty"? And if not, then what makes you think that you have this "beauty" and unable to think logically?

[мимоходом]

it turns Out that all the above written is from the point of view of YOUR logic and "beauty"

It turns out that Yes. And what is the contradiction?

[Петя Варежкин]

How do you know that know how to think logically and have a "beauty"? Maybe the logic is not quite what you think (and "beauty")? Why lead people astray?

[Петя Варежкин]

What people have come up with IMHO?

[мимоходом]

What misconception do not quite understand. But if I misled - I'm sorry, are removed. Talking to you the whole turn's worth, and I'm here getting in the way...

[Петя Варежкин]

The misconception that you are confident to talk about the things that we can't be sure. You can't even be sure that you talk. And don't even know whether those things are trying to talk, thinking talk. And whether these things? And whether you want to talk about them?

[Петя Варежкин]

it turns Out that all the above written is from the point of view of YOUR logic and "beauty"

It turns out that Yes. And what is the contradiction?

It turns out that there is a simple logic, and there is some mythical "your logic". These things should warn in advance not to lead people astray.

[Петя Варежкин]

Deducted from Internet:

Objectivity — the object, independence from the subject; the factors or processes that do not depend on the will or desire of man (humanity).

In philosophy

The term "objective" in the philosophical works is used in various aspects. This concept is relative to the real objects indicates that the objects, their characteristics and manifestations exist outside and independently of the subject (the ontological aspect), relative concepts, ideas, judgments — that they are a reflection of material realityand their content does not depend on man or mankind (epistemological aspect). Objectivity is opposed to subjectivity — bias (prejudice).

This is Wikipedia. Further, it is:

an Opinion is a judgment viewpoint or statement on the subject, which is impossible to achieve complete objectivity, based on the interpretation of facts and emotional attitudes.

How can there be a biased opinion if it is based on facts?

Opinion is not subject to factual verification, unlike the fact that can be verified and the verification is confirmed or refuted.

PAC steel.

the Fact (lat. Factum — accomplished) — the term in the broadest sense can act as a synonym of truth; an event or result; real, not fictitious; specific and singular as opposed to General and abstract...

a Statement that can not be directly confirmed or refuted is called a hypothesis or opinion.

A-a-a-a

Wiktionary

not-for-sred-governmental-but. 1. adverb to ADJ. direct; directly, without an intermediary. 2. naturally, without hesitation and doubt following his internal desire. 3. same as directly; without a spatial or temporal interval.

Draw your own conclusions.


PS. To me it reminded one case. My mother works for Coca-Cola. And once she brought me a poster. On it was painted "advantages" of this "beverage." I liked this:"contains No calories=numerous studies=safe products"





PS.S. BU-ha-ha...<

[Петя Варежкин]

Yes, Yes, Yes. Can already hear Mr. Casually said to me:"What is there to understand? There is a fact, and everything else is opinion."
OK. What, then, is not a fact? AA, not the fact it is a subjective opinion. You don't say! Well then, the fact - objective

[Петя Варежкин]

What I have done! He write, he replied. Beauty! Gonna go take a NAP, perhaps...

[Петя Варежкин]

So here So, if the fact cannot be proved, then it is opinion. And if you can,... the same opinion

[Петя Варежкин]

And finally

Beautifully wrapped. Well, something like that, Yes. There are facts and there are interpretations.

I wonder how to interpret the fact? A fact can only be fact.

Any interpretation are cut to the facts with some distortion.

Why make cuts when you take it out completely? And it is impossible in principle. What does it mean to "cut a fact"? It means "to talk" superficially, that is, do not argue. Thus it is possible to come to amazing "facts" that you have happened

For a single fact can have many interpretations, among them are more optimal and less.

Do you hear yourself? So, you're living in your own fictional world where the facts multiple interpretations How do you navigate? And now seriously. Do not get me wrong, it's not an insult. Go to a psychiatrist, my advice to you. From the heart.

the Person expressing the opinion - voiced by his interpretation (distortion of fact).

If the person voices the fact that there can be no distortion (if mentally healthy).

the Other person is listening and understanding - distorts the distortion again, according to his understanding.

The same.

But, in principle, the distortions, if they collect a lot - can be detected and the fact

To detect the fact of the distortion? Damn, in what world you live? Direct Kingdom of crooked mirrors. The fact can be detected only by removing the distortion, what can help a qualified technician. Again. It's not banter, I'm serious. Good luck.

[Петя Варежкин]

Something I was sad...

[Петя Варежкин]

passing Just do not bother (you never know). It was just trolling based on the facts. Everything as you like

[Петя Варежкин]

It was just trolling based on the facts.

But maybe not