2. about informed choice is understandable, but it is also clear why relatively few reviews. I know some active users... they don't need the discounts, contests and bonuses, but precious time and free online NO. This is one reason. The second is that not everyone can organize and evaluate the work products.
The third reason is the relatively large number of users. Based on the fact that the reviews always says a certain percentage of users, if a small amount, it sometimes happens that they are not supplied.
It is a normal and natural phenomenon. I don't think that will be different.
You need to understand that the reviews are often stimulated by some of the most vivid impressions. That does not mean that in other cases, no meaningful work products, but it does mean that in other cases the failed inner barrier of the user associated with the desire to share and desire to spend time on it.
We're in a relatively small number are actively writing on the forum. And those actively writing up a small part of consumers. The rest can and competitions not to know, not only not to write. They bought and enjoy... feedback is not received.
On the other hand, the BASIC purpose of the product, I, in General, used to zaplanirovany effects from working. And while I do not know of direct exceptions. Here is the extension of effects (as is the case with any pass) -I know. But it is rather a bit of an anomaly and maybe not all of it is well pronounced.
Bracelets Life
3. Well, if you have your reviews on some product, I don't believe that reviews do not... 
Hidden reviews (in personal correspondence) is not enough, and whenever possible, I publish them.
In addition, all manufactured runs internal tests. But their description is taken into account in the description of the item, although mainly it's the identical one embedded in the product when it is created.
Hidden reviews (in personal correspondence) is not enough, and whenever possible, I publish them.
In addition, all manufactured runs internal tests. But their description is taken into account in the description of the item, although mainly it's the identical one embedded in the product when it is created.
Becomes more clear, but how to implement this choice?Here, for example, liked the description of some products, but it is capacious, due to this vague (I think this is a reasonable idea - removes self-limiting expectations), but how do I know what exactly I get? As several products with each other to compare? As the price reflects the capabilities of the resulting benefit? Maybe those same opportunities may be obtained at a lower cost in certain configurations of several less complex products? For example, how significantly is the difference (pros and cons) to the expected effects of the BZ 2.5 + ISB 1 and ISB 2, with equal value? The price of individual products is clear adequate including costs, and how costs get adequate effects? If the car is to cover with gold it's faster and better to not go, but will not be cheap, but if you modify the structural elements above the base, it is possible to achieve the best results, while the price may be far below the "gold plated". I apologize for the inappropriate comparison, but the point I think is clear.
Sincerely, MAG.no
the priority for me in choosing prices just the presence of adequate intrinsic properties of the product with the price. Actually, I very much hope that in this parameter in most cases we have in stock a large discount but of course, if you start to compare with each other.... the discount for more expensive products.
Thus, for instance, for BZ 2.x+ could be set according to the complexity and possible effects of a slightly higher price, but I'm already focused on the possibilities buyers.... "on average"....
Returning to the specific issue.
ИСН1 and ИСН2 -slightly different products, and not only for power (now the answer in another thread I will add - will become clearer). Therefore, the combination of 2.5+ИСН1, one ИСН2, 2.5 and ИСН2 - they are unique....
A bracelet will not replace a full Sri-om. But isn always will be more powerful than the bracelet on the hand, except for the possible products of the series "E".
ИСН2 has its pros and cons. The price is adequate to its consumer qualities. But the functionality is not identical just ИСН1 in the strong, and can not be replaced not by him, not BJ, even powerful version....
As for user expectations, the situation is this - in each case all individually, but the products are not in vain are combined with each other, their integration allows to get a stronger CUMULATIVE effects. Yes, it's really hard to rate, I hope that this is understandable to a certain category of consumers, long used different sochetaniya products.
Naturally such a capacity, mass and manoeuvrability is not required, but useful. So this is not gold only, but the feasibility should be assessed individually based on the capabilities and needs plus personal impact (effects) of other products.
Went to write about ИСН2.
but of course, if you start to compare with each other.... the discount for more expensive products.Thus, for instance, for BZ 2.x+ could be set according to the complexity and possible effects of a slightly higher price, but I'm already focused on the possibilities buyers.... "on average"....
Returning to the specific issue.
ИСН1 and ИСН2 -slightly different products, and not only for power (now the answer in another thread I will add - will become clearer). Therefore, the combination of 2.5+ИСН1, one ИСН2, 2.5 and ИСН2 - they are unique....
A bracelet will not replace a full Sri-om. But isn always will be more powerful than the bracelet on the hand, except for the possible products of the series "E".
ИСН2 has its pros and cons. The price is adequate to its consumer qualities. But the functionality is not identical just ИСН1 in the strong, and can not be replaced not by him, not BJ, even powerful version....
As for user expectations, the situation is this - in each case all individually, but the products are not in vain are combined with each other, their integration allows to get a stronger CUMULATIVE effects. Yes, it's really hard to rate, I hope that this is understandable to a certain category of consumers, long used different sochetaniya products.
Naturally such a capacity, mass and manoeuvrability is not required, but useful. So this is not gold only, but the feasibility should be assessed individually based on the capabilities and needs plus personal impact (effects) of other products.
Went to write about ИСН2.
as for the adequacy of the obtained effects, it is not always possible to objectively evaluate from the user side (more precisely, not all users and not in all situations it can), so I try to stick to the bottom of at least.... leaving Finance some resource to the development of technology and production (generally it is the development and eats almost anything).
For example, 2.1 nekotorym effects, exactly like the AU, but also for some effects, could equate to something like 3.0 S++, but it's terribly limited audience, these effects really did not show up at all and so on... so the rating is for the overall average effects, some 2.1 amplified 2.0, and AC is one of the many extensions of at with its narrow functionality.
I try and will try to leave the product in the zone of maximum reasonable availability. Free also will continue to appear.
Here in the old days, you could make ONE very powerful artifact for a few years, sell of a wealthy and worthy man, and to go about their business... not only that, then the production was organized differently, has been a tradition in training and this created a queue of apprentices, ready to live, work and carry out some draft objectives for the knowledge, training and accommodation with meals. Now the production needs a different approach and costs. Sorry for the light nostalgia for the ancient past
For example, 2.1 nekotorym effects, exactly like the AU, but also for some effects, could equate to something like 3.0 S++, but it's terribly limited audience, these effects really did not show up at all and so on... so the rating is for the overall average effects, some 2.1 amplified 2.0, and AC is one of the many extensions of at with its narrow functionality.
I try and will try to leave the product in the zone of maximum reasonable availability. Free also will continue to appear.
Here in the old days, you could make ONE very powerful artifact for a few years, sell of a wealthy and worthy man, and to go about their business... not only that, then the production was organized differently, has been a tradition in training and this created a queue of apprentices, ready to live, work and carry out some draft objectives for the knowledge, training and accommodation with meals. Now the production needs a different approach and costs. Sorry for the light nostalgia for the ancient past
nostalgia is certainly interesting, but nothing prevents similar on the one hand, and on the other hand when it is:)and the salt was like gold:)Willing to pay for a very powerful artifact, when done for several years - a peck of saltМихаил_ wrote:Here in the old days, you could make ONE very powerful artifact for a few years, sell of a wealthy and worthy man, and to go about their business... not only that, then the production was organized differently, has been a tradition in training and this created a queue of apprentices, ready to live, work and carry out some draft objectives for the knowledge, training and accommodation with meals. Now the production needs a different approach and costs. Sorry for the light nostalgia for the ancient past
as in ancient times, as journeymen and now can be, if you have sufficient prospects of its development and the resulting positive effects of this interaction, ready for the dirty work, because You yourself know it. The question here is rather the faithfulness of motivation
A development course is a good and useful investment, but that's "limited amount" the finished product sometimes makes the price, not low. No, of course not high, but purchasing high-tech item of choice remains, or "invest" in the launch of a satellite into orbit or you can't buy this "high-tech iron", and treat "old fashioned way" (by the way even has an advantage over KNOW-HOW-iron). And at no additional cost.
Sincerely, MAG.no
1.
assure usually except for the peck of salt and managed to get a lot of other things, useful and to the point, mainly through the proper fin. exchange or direct barter. But now also has its advantages.
By the way, I did not say that the artifact is a few years old, I was told that it had to be done every few years to receive funding for their own work. Now the story is different, I'm not looking for funding, I'm interested in the possibility of a mild correction socialnyh processes in the direction of harmonization and stabilization, we could leave the area free of items, but it would restrict technologies, and, oddly enough, the efficiency of project development.
2. You know, I myself often recommend without frills. For example of what can be squeezed from the same 1.0 and 3.0 Lite it very much and you can limit it on all counts. Self-sufficient. Everything else is if you have the desire, the objective possibility and the feeling of need.
For me the most is the ability to modularly increase the effects where it is not possible to increase the power of a single product for the objective reasons. While it is possible, at least I'm happy (this is not an objective self-assessment within the framework of personal use).
So there is no reason to collect all items in a row. Their variety leaves the opportunity to reasonable choice.
assure
usually except for the peck of salt and managed to get a lot of other things, useful and to the point, mainly through the proper fin. exchange or direct barter. But now also has its advantages.By the way, I did not say that the artifact is a few years old, I was told that it had to be done every few years to receive funding for their own work. Now the story is different, I'm not looking for funding, I'm interested in the possibility of a mild correction socialnyh processes in the direction of harmonization and stabilization, we could leave the area free of items, but it would restrict technologies, and, oddly enough, the efficiency of project development.
2. You know, I myself often recommend without frills. For example of what can be squeezed from the same 1.0 and 3.0 Lite it very much and you can limit it on all counts. Self-sufficient. Everything else is if you have the desire, the objective possibility and the feeling of need.
For me the most is the ability to modularly increase the effects where it is not possible to increase the power of a single product for the objective reasons. While it is possible, at least I'm happy (this is not an objective self-assessment within the framework of personal use).
So there is no reason to collect all items in a row. Their variety leaves the opportunity to reasonable choice.
Here we again come to the initial question, with such a variety of choice as a reasonable buyer to independently configure the necessary from the many offers?Михаил_ wrote:Their variety leaves the opportunity to reasonable choice.
We will not go far, Ah, in your variety describes some useful results, each "x" individuality "in" (at) that I can add such customization, for example AK? If you have similar (but not similar principles of interaction). The same PASS...
Sincerely, MAG.no
Well here is a concrete question gives the possibility to give a detailed and specific answer.
1. Skipping this part of the system "Stabilizer". That it works a little wider passport description, not a glitch and not a violation of the "native" algorithm, I just didn't put restrictions in the area of application, and the algorithm describes the conditions of interaction and by chance it turned out that under these conditions it is not only the originally intended situation.
There are no social interactions. The presence of the manifested effect has other causes.
It is likely that the vivid work of those or other programs You have, including those enhanced by the presence of commercial (still powerful) version of the Stabilizer.
2. The presence of the entire series Ah, due to several aspects. This and the desire to strengthen in society the positive aspects of it(let say P1), and "the problem" the deterioration of social ties people have with changes in the personal aspect (the development of certain abilities, improved energy etc., often lead to the violation of sync with society), well, let's call PP2.,
there is a third aspect (PP3) associated with the operation of any other product (SK, BJ, Stabilizer, etc.). And that they do not interact directly with society, with probability, energy, mass "objects" of interaction -Yes. And society it would like an independent thing, if considered as a separate entity. Thus, among the external factors that can make or break a straw that give the advantage here or there in some situation, there are aspects of the impact of society (as a whole).
For the entire series Ah we all three are important aspects of this series, in different situations different ways. Each extension is a unique professional tool for a specific type of work. I.e. you can always do a good pocketknife for carving, chop wood, Board, nail and so on... but if for every purpose there is a tool, the work efficiency will be higher, although it may not be immediately noticeable.
Each of Ah extension increases the capacity of the entire complex.
AK activates your aspect and it's not like "Pass", though, because the pass - withdrawing effect of the stabilizer, and, if non-standard application, not a social type of impact around the operator.
AK gives preferential treatment (where possible) by the social algorithms (in the framework of their social act is intended in a positive sense) and their performers. This is not the reaction of people to "skip it" and the opportunity to find the desired interaction, communication, help, protection, friends... to access desired portions of society and their administrative units. All this must be done within the law, but should be attenuated various corruption and bureaucratic aspects.
Yes, this is possible only a kind of "drop" in the sea, i.e. the influence of the AK may not be magically significant, but it is assumed that it goes with a lot of other aspects and the amount can be a significant value, especially if the situation is somewhere in between either-or....
On this basis, and think about whether.
In General, AK and Pass are not fully comparable and completely different and the algorithms and the expected results.
In addition, a whole set Ah must to work as a social positivization and power aspirations of the operator within society. I.e. the amount of extension of the Ah creates a lot of micro effects, activating positive aspects of society in the area of your interests and a little bit further. But since these (and extensions and their micropozzetti) - many, the result may be like the rope - it from thin filaments, but it can create a great traction.
Maybe it will be clearer.<
1. Skipping this part of the system "Stabilizer". That it works a little wider passport description, not a glitch and not a violation of the "native" algorithm, I just didn't put restrictions in the area of application, and the algorithm describes the conditions of interaction and by chance it turned out that under these conditions it is not only the originally intended situation.
There are no social interactions. The presence of the manifested effect has other causes.
It is likely that the vivid work of those or other programs You have, including those enhanced by the presence of commercial (still powerful) version of the Stabilizer.
2. The presence of the entire series Ah, due to several aspects. This and the desire to strengthen in society the positive aspects of it(let say P1), and "the problem" the deterioration of social ties people have with changes in the personal aspect (the development of certain abilities, improved energy etc., often lead to the violation of sync with society), well, let's call PP2.,
there is a third aspect (PP3) associated with the operation of any other product (SK, BJ, Stabilizer, etc.). And that they do not interact directly with society, with probability, energy, mass "objects" of interaction -Yes. And society it would like an independent thing, if considered as a separate entity. Thus, among the external factors that can make or break a straw that give the advantage here or there in some situation, there are aspects of the impact of society (as a whole).
For the entire series Ah we all three are important aspects of this series, in different situations different ways. Each extension is a unique professional tool for a specific type of work. I.e. you can always do a good pocketknife for carving, chop wood, Board, nail and so on... but if for every purpose there is a tool, the work efficiency will be higher, although it may not be immediately noticeable.
Each of Ah extension increases the capacity of the entire complex.
AK activates your aspect and it's not like "Pass", though, because the pass - withdrawing effect of the stabilizer, and, if non-standard application, not a social type of impact around the operator.
AK gives preferential treatment (where possible) by the social algorithms (in the framework of their social act is intended in a positive sense) and their performers. This is not the reaction of people to "skip it" and the opportunity to find the desired interaction, communication, help, protection, friends... to access desired portions of society and their administrative units. All this must be done within the law, but should be attenuated various corruption and bureaucratic aspects.
Yes, this is possible only a kind of "drop" in the sea, i.e. the influence of the AK may not be magically significant, but it is assumed that it goes with a lot of other aspects and the amount can be a significant value, especially if the situation is somewhere in between either-or....
On this basis, and think about whether.
In General, AK and Pass are not fully comparable and completely different and the algorithms and the expected results.
In addition, a whole set Ah must to work as a social positivization and power aspirations of the operator within society. I.e. the amount of extension of the Ah creates a lot of micro effects, activating positive aspects of society in the area of your interests and a little bit further. But since these (and extensions and their micropozzetti) - many, the result may be like the rope - it from thin filaments, but it can create a great traction.
Maybe it will be clearer.<
And about"rope" is much clearer, and PASS, and not only it... I think in my case it accidentally got repeated effect, for example. There was a situation at work, where multiple active parties, and I have "0" real arguments, the urgent search for options, I found a little unusual solution - "so they talked among themselves and have found a solution", but to me silence is not the reason, you need to say something. In the hand was a PASS that came to mind "pass the focus" ("Great and mighty..."). And watched an interesting effect, I started to say, immediately stepped "dispute" between these "active sides", I just didn't notice:) in the end and I was not silent:)and they agreed to do the best for all manner, without affecting attention to me at all (never! just "Invisible Cap" what ), and not small according to circumstances and time-consuming process. So the "mental programs" to the Stabilizer is quite wide in range of application, at least for me. And not only that... With some other programs (VIP), a similar story, only in the opposite aspect and this raises the question, is it custom programming TO, and the only product in this context a fulcrum to allow such a development?
Sincerely, MAG.no
), and not small according to circumstances and time-consuming process. So the "mental programs" to the Stabilizer is quite wide in range of application, at least for me. And not only that... With some other programs (VIP), a similar story, only in the opposite aspect and this raises the question, is it custom programming TO, and the only product in this context a fulcrum to allow such a development? Sincerely, MAG.no
Good day to all.
Not found a suitable branch to his questions-ask here.
Wear BJ 2.0 less than a month,decided to make another BJ 1.0.
All the instructions Packed in 4 pairs of layers,all the water,but
something apparently misunderstood or lack of experience-in General
the package with the headset and the bracelet was a half of water in the end.But headphones live and the bracelet dried up.
Maybe someone will share the technological secrets of waterproofing work materials .And yet - it will be a "floater" working or again to repeat?
Will break in the process of recording (set recording at night and in the morning we had to leave the computer turned off for a few hours later went back to tracks 2-5 on the night) on the performance of BJ 1.0?
Not found a suitable branch to his questions-ask here.
Wear BJ 2.0 less than a month,decided to make another BJ 1.0.
All the instructions Packed in 4 pairs of layers,all the water,but
something apparently misunderstood or lack of experience-in General
the package with the headset and the bracelet was a half of water in the end.But headphones live and the bracelet dried up.
Maybe someone will share the technological secrets of waterproofing work materials .And yet - it will be a "floater" working or again to repeat?
Will break in the process of recording (set recording at night and in the morning we had to leave the computer turned off for a few hours later went back to tracks 2-5 on the night) on the performance of BJ 1.0?
And why 4 pair? I like that I just did for comparison - headphones/bracelets/foil layer and a rubber glove "with weights"... and in the water. I.e. 1 pair of insulating layers .worked.Форман wrote:Everything according to the instructions Packed in 4 pairs of layers
Or did something wrong?
Sincerely, MAG.no
1.0 charged so bracelets and stuff+headphones ,wrapped with foil tape and so 3 times .So much was available to put all the contents of the glove is large in size.Then it's all in the water (in a pot),crushed stone and on the computer, obsessed with the day. And headphones intact and the bracelets dry.The new glove was because.
I wore them, son,mother,and daughter. Okay. Gets used to it. Before 2.0 began to wear. Then the son and 3.0 began to wear loose. 3.0 coated with a matrix made from 1.0.
I wore them, son,mother,and daughter. Okay. Gets used to it. Before 2.0 began to wear. Then the son and 3.0 began to wear loose. 3.0 coated with a matrix made from 1.0.
-
Мастер ДАО
- Posts:136
- Joined:Tue Aug 03, 2010 17:11
Good time to all.
Question Personally to MICHAEL. An hour Ago at 3am( the Hour of the Ox ) my Father Died. Instantly and without pain. More from Age. He had the Bracelet of life 2.0 . The question is more Ethical. What should I do with this bracelet that he wore more than six months. To bury my Father with him or take off and produce something. Are there any options is the right or expedient thing to do. Thank you in advance for your Reply. Ask to meet as soon as possible. And he almost did not realize,but I tips. My mother is BJ 2.0. which modules and how can I enable by myself and my 2.1 and 2.0, to help hold in all that happens with the Father. And in advance Sorry if some time I will not access the Forum. But I will definitely be Back.
This "CARE" is Also Part of the TAO... the TAO Master...
Question Personally to MICHAEL. An hour Ago at 3am( the Hour of the Ox ) my Father Died. Instantly and without pain. More from Age. He had the Bracelet of life 2.0 . The question is more Ethical. What should I do with this bracelet that he wore more than six months. To bury my Father with him or take off and produce something. Are there any options is the right or expedient thing to do. Thank you in advance for your Reply. Ask to meet as soon as possible. And he almost did not realize,but I tips. My mother is BJ 2.0. which modules and how can I enable by myself and my 2.1 and 2.0, to help hold in all that happens with the Father. And in advance Sorry if some time I will not access the Forum. But I will definitely be Back.
This "CARE" is Also Part of the TAO... the TAO Master...
Hello!
Master Tao, please accept my condolences. On another forum from Michael a message yesterday.
"I'll be almost offline until mid-day Wednesday... likely to respond and to write something will not be easy (will be busy). "
Perhaps the answer will be too late.
I probably would have left the bracelet to the father, even though he already kind of is not needed. So, You decide.
Master Tao, please accept my condolences. On another forum from Michael a message yesterday.
"I'll be almost offline until mid-day Wednesday... likely to respond and to write something will not be easy (will be busy). "
Perhaps the answer will be too late.
I probably would have left the bracelet to the father, even though he already kind of is not needed. So, You decide.
-
Мастер ДАО
- Posts:136
- Joined:Tue Aug 03, 2010 17:11
All Good vremeni. Thank you for the Sympathy, Participation and All Your Help... really helps me. And with the bracelet, I thought,and decided. Moreover, the Father himself being a longtime almost a Communist and the more ideological in many ways, BJ suddenly was received with enthusiasm. And wore Relentlessly. Let him the Bracelet and go. The only thing with his hands I took. And just laid around. Hope Network "Bracelet of Life" it will be perceived adequately and correctly. As for the network as a whole and for each individual. Always your Master TAO...
Master Tao, please accept my sincere condolences. It is a great loss. I wish You a speedy return.
What concerns the bracelet, it's not so simple, I would not dare to answer. If you leave the bracelet with the father, in my opinion, it should be disabled. I don't know...
And Michael in the zone of inaccessibility...
What concerns the bracelet, it's not so simple, I would not dare to answer. If you leave the bracelet with the father, in my opinion, it should be disabled. I don't know...
And Michael in the zone of inaccessibility...
-
Андрей Кабанков
- Автор сайта
- Posts:3875
- Joined:Fri Mar 31, 2006 8:19
- Has thanked: 1 time
- Been thanked: 182 times
Accept my condolences, Master TAO.
I'm sorry that is not just because it did not immediately see.
I would like to ask: there are several versions of BJ 2.0 the performance, i.e. there is stone, wood, ebony. whether strongly affects the material from which they are made work itself? understand that once affected, but are interested in the details) understand that perhaps the question somewhere asked already here.
I'm sorry that is not just because it did not immediately see.
I would like to ask: there are several versions of BJ 2.0 the performance, i.e. there is stone, wood, ebony. whether strongly affects the material from which they are made work itself? understand that once affected, but are interested in the details) understand that perhaps the question somewhere asked already here.
Last edited by Антон И. on Mon Apr 11, 2011 23:08, edited 2 times in total.
Bracelet left somewhere in the sidelines, but removed from the person can benefit him till he in the body (before the new birth and possibly beyond). The bracelet left with the person is disabled, although it will remain working, since the body and the man in this moment is not the same, and the place of any burial - place of power of energy of death, respectively, to transmit power to a man from there does not work, but no harm neither to him nor to bracelet, no other users from this, too, will not, at least just because BJ is able to pass through itself if necessary, and this energy.
For this reason, the most correct I think the option that asked to publish Andrew.
For this reason, the most correct I think the option that asked to publish Andrew.