To me personally, anyway. I asked these questions to adherents of the Christian faith just. For me, this question about who these books are written, whether they are the Holy Scriptures, etc. - does not exist. Because all the ones on the ground of religious denomination, I belong to egregorial associations. And absolutely sincerely believe that the meaning of the incarnation of man on earth — the development and expansion of consciousness to the one. And if someone fell into the category of people control other people, I do not envy. But not sympathize. As a person who controls other people with the help of invented models of the world bears some measure of responsibility, than just a performer. And, accordingly, the load of possible errors in the execution of its governing regulations, which the person takes with him into another world — is not commensurate to above. Because there is always the risk that the author has created not quite, and took not entirely in the wrong direction. We already mentioned about the creation of man "in the image and likeness". Let me remind you, I already wrote about this. According to the model and likeness, means "THINKING". Capable of thinking. Because the Creator is called the Creator or the Creator. Because he Creates and Creates. It never called the "Administrator." Any created and implemented a model of human development and the management of certain people or groups of people, a big headache for its Creator. In the future, in another world. Because it deprives a person of freedom of choice. Russian Krishnamurti is well understood.Михаил_ wrote:Each contains its own model..Смелый wrote: Who is against. Wrote and wrote.
Then who wrote the Koran who wrote the Talmud?
Why do different people worship different Holy books?
What in Your opinion are the main?
The world consists of the amount of models, and the separation of different - gives pole and improves opportunity management.
Stronger reading is embedded in a specific model.
Why model is the only method of control.
One person has freedom of choice within the General trajectory of the world, it cannot fundamentally change the world if it is not already mortgaged most optimal energy trajectory (i.e., the principle of direct rolling from the hill, not on a plan there's that). The world's too big compared to one person.
But if people will write a very popular book -it can dramatically change the world, affecting masses of people who will be involved in the process, their weight will be commensurate to the changes.
However, most of the even very brilliant books are not considered Holy Scripture.
Therefore, in this case we are dealing with authorized (i.e. approved by someone) systems changes the world, operating from different angles and run at different times.
The difference between a popular book and a Bible in depth a large group of people in a new picture of the world. For us now it is covered with "history", but it just appeared, and the depth of the planet's history much, much more.....
Well, something like that. Not for the sake of controversy but for the sake of expression, not mandatory for others.
Good luck to everyone!<
