1. Answers to Your questions are on the forum and repeatedly. If you wish, you can find them and at the same time to realize that answers to new questions(e.g. about the microphone, record, and emotions), too.
2. All very even in the framework of physics. Just got in the physics topics that are not popularized to the level of the books, even and glowing on TV, even in programs for many controversial content, but it constantly... and with links to quite academic scientists, real, work which is available.
for example, on the same Korotkova or Goryaeva (just for example).
In particular Goryaev conducted experiments of remote effects on people are similar in genome (relatives) with the distance of impact - across the ocean (on different continents people were).
Recording "emotions" exactly the same picture. In the audio they are certainly not.
But there is a resonance with the state of the author. That is why live music is different from recordings, and even to write many more love concert "live" version, rather than mounted on the operator panel from the heap of tracks - the perception is different.
Man is able to perceive and to perceive is always a lot of information beyond the ordinary. The same radio waves affect the body quite physically. The experiments are quite successful and show that the body and mind are sensitive to the mass of the information is not visible to us but quite visible to consciousness as secondary signals, which do not form a picture of the eyes, smell or tactile sensation, but affect us quite materially.
A simple household example - magnetic storms. Everyone is talking about them and their impact on weather-sensitive people.
But no one knows exactly how that affects it.
3. The answer to Your question of "how proved" does not make sense. And who have to prove? there are different communities of people having their view of the world. Some religious for example. Other atheists. You do not run to them shouting "proven that there is a God" or Vice versa, what is not? The people gathered here are very different, but have their own, backed by practice, the perception of the world. Im the best proof is the practice. I.e. practical experience. And to get the experience they're looking for first someone who will convince them, I tried and got a private practice. I'm not talking about specific audio tracks, but in General about a lot of unusual here.
Andrew gave You the absolutely correct advice - if doesn't fit your perception of the world - it is easier to pass.
Here mostly those people who are able to read information on the forum and find it necessary for yourself to understand.
Agree, would not properly come for example in the club of nuclear physicists and say that just do not understand their terminology - they are a cult. Ie, not even trying to understand. But even more, it would be incorrect to require to teach You on the go, in the club room. What You think and how do you evaluate present - is in fact still those who are talking, but not to meddle with its Charter in someone else's garden.
Want to try to understand - will have to read a lot.
Don't want to - well, you'll have to pass as evidence for You personally there is no one to do it will not, because why?

<