The impact of technology on the subconscious
Posted: Tue Jun 10, 2014 18:17
Article of Andrey Patrushev.
The impact of technology on the subconscious, bypassing the critical thinking (25-th frame subliminal programming, etc.) have long been circulated on the Internet.
Not spared these technologies and the market. For example, Alexander Sviyash, there are a series of discs "the Easy way to positive changes. Audionastroi for internal improvement." Here's a quote from the site: "the Uniqueness of the offered products is that it produces the desired changes directly affecting your brain, bypassing the protective filter of consciousness, such as evaluation, comparison, criticism, doubt, etc." (http://www.mindmachine.ru/sviyash.htm).
The essence of this audio technology is that a message for the subconscious, often expressed in the form of affirmations (positive affirmations in the first person) is written on a very quiet volume and masked by music or noise (waterfall, waves, wind noise, birds singing, etc.) — hence the name: "subliminal (below the threshold of conscious perception) communication" — "subliminal communication".
It operates as follows: after repeated listening, the subconscious gradually starts to produce and analyze this masked signal and to respond to him as your "inner voice".
Like everything else, about subliminal communications online you can find completely opposite opinions.
For example, Richard Bandler (Creator of NLP and master all sorts of practical jokes) writes that once they with a friend (the owner of the clinic of neurosis) made a subliminal recording with a single phrase: "Every thing in this life annoys you more and more", put them on the sound of the surf and distributed to the regular customers of the clinic, leaving the rest, claiming that they recorded a series of selected affirmations, calming nerves. On arrival clients back all of them a voice, claimed it was the most restful vacation of their lives.
On the other hand, known in the West, an expert on subliminal communication Eldon Taylor (http://www.eldontaylor.com) proved the effectiveness of their program using the test double-blind (although this procedure is applicable only for medicines). He did, in the course of the experiment, reduced recidivism among released inmates from one of the prisons of the United States.
That is, we again are faced with the ancient truth that we told grandfather Krylov: "the Trouble if pies begin furnaces the shoemaker, and to stitch boots the pastry...".
In our country, similar technology was engaged by the doctor, the doctor of medical Sciences, Professor Igor Smirnov. Only recording technology "therapeutic plot" it was significantly different from the usual subliminal. With the help of Fourier-transformed the recorded voice into a special form, then the voice adds a certain high-frequency constant and was performed by the inverse transform. As a result, the vote was postponed in the high frequency region (approximately 15 kHz).
The volume of the transformed voice is normal for the perception (although the voice as well as subliminale is not recognized by consciousness) and, as studies have shown that the efficiency of this technology is much higher than the normal subliminal. Although Smirnov then, to implement this technology, it was necessary to order the production of special equipment on one of the secret at that time enterprises, it is now easy (for a professional) to implement the same Adobe autdition 3 (in older versions not), just with the push of two buttons.
Whether technology I. V.Smirnov somehow "leaked" to the West, whether they are smart enough, but now the commercial broadcast different content, under the General title Supraliminal (about threshold) are widely represented on foreign sites.
In Russia, these technologies are implemented in the programs of agriculture (SOMVI) (http://www.mindmachine.ru/somvi/), and I. V. Smirnova continues his widow — Elena G. Rusalkina.
LITERATURE:
1. L. A. bliznichenko Input and consolidation of information in human memory during natural sleep. Naukova Dumka, 1966
2. Vostrikov, A. A., Litvinov V. G., Pietrusinski V. V. Effect of gupermnesia due to informational stimulation in ossp: proc. Republican seminar "Actual problems of use of suggestology and suggestive of pedagogy in University practice". Odessa, 1980.
3. Diament E., Kiselev S. V., Litvinov V. G., Pietrusinski V. V., Pronin V. M. Experience of intensification multi-disciplinary training on the basis of suggestedseating method // Problems of intensification of the forms and methods of teaching foreign languages. Yaroslavl, 1981.
4. Kaloshina I. P., Kuzmina G,N. New functions of computers in pedagogy // Modern methods and means of teaching. M., 1981.
5. Kiselev S. V. study of the possibilities of intensification of activities suggestive memory techniques // Psychological-pedagogical study of the personality of the student / MOPI im. N. To. Krupskaya. M., 1977.
6. Kiselev S. V. Subliminal suggestion as a factor in the intensification of mnemonic activity // Unconscious. Nature. Function. Research methods. Tbilisi, 1978. Vol.3.
7. Kiselev S. V. Suggestive methods of intensification of MNEMIC activity]. dis. for a candidate. of psychological Sciences. M., 1979.
8. Choker 3. The question of intensification of teaching with impact on the subconscious mechanisms of the brain // Problems of suggestology. Sofia, 1973.
9. Kostandov E. A. About studying subconscious reactions, Vestn. USSR ACADEMY OF SCIENCES 1970. No. 1.
10. Litvinov V. G. Some questions of automation heterosuggestion state management: proc. reports of the Republican scientific-methodical conference of teachers and graduate students of universities of culture and art. Odessa, 1978.
11. G. K. Lozanov Suggestology. Sofia, 1971.
12. Pietrusinski V. Automated system of intensive training. M.: higher school, 1987. 192 from: Il.
13. Pietrusinski V. V. information subsensory stimulation during intense training // Unconscious components of mental activity during learning. Perm, 1983.
14. Pietrusinski V. V. Basic principles suggestedseating approach to the intensification of teaching theoretical disciplines in ways of intensification and automation of training and advanced training. Kazan, 1983.
15. Pietrusinski Suggestibility V. V. integral method of accelerated learning //Methods of intensive foreign languages teaching / megpie of them. Maurice Thorez. M., 1977. vol. 3.
16. Platonov, K. the Word as a physiological and therapeutic factor. M., 1957.
17. Problems of management intellectual work. Psihodelicheskoy programming /ed. by V. V. Chavchanidze. Tbilisi, 1974.
18. Raider E. G. S. S. Liebig Memorization of linguistic material in terms of muscle relaxation and autogenic training // Problems. psychology. 1967. No. 1.
19. Sirovsky E. M. Intensification of the learning process at a higher scale using the complex-hypnotic method: abstract. dis. Cand. L., 1970.
20. Talyzina N. F. Managing the process of learning. M., 1975.
21. Talyzina N. F., Gabay T. V. Ways and means of automation of the educational process. M., 1977.
22. Uznadze D. N. Experimental foundations of psychology installation. Tbilisi, 1961.
23. Khachapuridze B. N. Activity experimentally formed susceptivity influences the subconscious sphere and its application to study // 1st international Symposium on problems of suggestology. Sofia, 1971.<
The impact of technology on the subconscious, bypassing the critical thinking (25-th frame subliminal programming, etc.) have long been circulated on the Internet.
Not spared these technologies and the market. For example, Alexander Sviyash, there are a series of discs "the Easy way to positive changes. Audionastroi for internal improvement." Here's a quote from the site: "the Uniqueness of the offered products is that it produces the desired changes directly affecting your brain, bypassing the protective filter of consciousness, such as evaluation, comparison, criticism, doubt, etc." (http://www.mindmachine.ru/sviyash.htm).
The essence of this audio technology is that a message for the subconscious, often expressed in the form of affirmations (positive affirmations in the first person) is written on a very quiet volume and masked by music or noise (waterfall, waves, wind noise, birds singing, etc.) — hence the name: "subliminal (below the threshold of conscious perception) communication" — "subliminal communication".
It operates as follows: after repeated listening, the subconscious gradually starts to produce and analyze this masked signal and to respond to him as your "inner voice".
Like everything else, about subliminal communications online you can find completely opposite opinions.
For example, Richard Bandler (Creator of NLP and master all sorts of practical jokes) writes that once they with a friend (the owner of the clinic of neurosis) made a subliminal recording with a single phrase: "Every thing in this life annoys you more and more", put them on the sound of the surf and distributed to the regular customers of the clinic, leaving the rest, claiming that they recorded a series of selected affirmations, calming nerves. On arrival clients back all of them a voice, claimed it was the most restful vacation of their lives.
On the other hand, known in the West, an expert on subliminal communication Eldon Taylor (http://www.eldontaylor.com) proved the effectiveness of their program using the test double-blind (although this procedure is applicable only for medicines). He did, in the course of the experiment, reduced recidivism among released inmates from one of the prisons of the United States.
That is, we again are faced with the ancient truth that we told grandfather Krylov: "the Trouble if pies begin furnaces the shoemaker, and to stitch boots the pastry...".
In our country, similar technology was engaged by the doctor, the doctor of medical Sciences, Professor Igor Smirnov. Only recording technology "therapeutic plot" it was significantly different from the usual subliminal. With the help of Fourier-transformed the recorded voice into a special form, then the voice adds a certain high-frequency constant and was performed by the inverse transform. As a result, the vote was postponed in the high frequency region (approximately 15 kHz).
The volume of the transformed voice is normal for the perception (although the voice as well as subliminale is not recognized by consciousness) and, as studies have shown that the efficiency of this technology is much higher than the normal subliminal. Although Smirnov then, to implement this technology, it was necessary to order the production of special equipment on one of the secret at that time enterprises, it is now easy (for a professional) to implement the same Adobe autdition 3 (in older versions not), just with the push of two buttons.
Whether technology I. V.Smirnov somehow "leaked" to the West, whether they are smart enough, but now the commercial broadcast different content, under the General title Supraliminal (about threshold) are widely represented on foreign sites.
In Russia, these technologies are implemented in the programs of agriculture (SOMVI) (http://www.mindmachine.ru/somvi/), and I. V. Smirnova continues his widow — Elena G. Rusalkina.
LITERATURE:
1. L. A. bliznichenko Input and consolidation of information in human memory during natural sleep. Naukova Dumka, 1966
2. Vostrikov, A. A., Litvinov V. G., Pietrusinski V. V. Effect of gupermnesia due to informational stimulation in ossp: proc. Republican seminar "Actual problems of use of suggestology and suggestive of pedagogy in University practice". Odessa, 1980.
3. Diament E., Kiselev S. V., Litvinov V. G., Pietrusinski V. V., Pronin V. M. Experience of intensification multi-disciplinary training on the basis of suggestedseating method // Problems of intensification of the forms and methods of teaching foreign languages. Yaroslavl, 1981.
4. Kaloshina I. P., Kuzmina G,N. New functions of computers in pedagogy // Modern methods and means of teaching. M., 1981.
5. Kiselev S. V. study of the possibilities of intensification of activities suggestive memory techniques // Psychological-pedagogical study of the personality of the student / MOPI im. N. To. Krupskaya. M., 1977.
6. Kiselev S. V. Subliminal suggestion as a factor in the intensification of mnemonic activity // Unconscious. Nature. Function. Research methods. Tbilisi, 1978. Vol.3.
7. Kiselev S. V. Suggestive methods of intensification of MNEMIC activity]. dis. for a candidate. of psychological Sciences. M., 1979.
8. Choker 3. The question of intensification of teaching with impact on the subconscious mechanisms of the brain // Problems of suggestology. Sofia, 1973.
9. Kostandov E. A. About studying subconscious reactions, Vestn. USSR ACADEMY OF SCIENCES 1970. No. 1.
10. Litvinov V. G. Some questions of automation heterosuggestion state management: proc. reports of the Republican scientific-methodical conference of teachers and graduate students of universities of culture and art. Odessa, 1978.
11. G. K. Lozanov Suggestology. Sofia, 1971.
12. Pietrusinski V. Automated system of intensive training. M.: higher school, 1987. 192 from: Il.
13. Pietrusinski V. V. information subsensory stimulation during intense training // Unconscious components of mental activity during learning. Perm, 1983.
14. Pietrusinski V. V. Basic principles suggestedseating approach to the intensification of teaching theoretical disciplines in ways of intensification and automation of training and advanced training. Kazan, 1983.
15. Pietrusinski Suggestibility V. V. integral method of accelerated learning //Methods of intensive foreign languages teaching / megpie of them. Maurice Thorez. M., 1977. vol. 3.
16. Platonov, K. the Word as a physiological and therapeutic factor. M., 1957.
17. Problems of management intellectual work. Psihodelicheskoy programming /ed. by V. V. Chavchanidze. Tbilisi, 1974.
18. Raider E. G. S. S. Liebig Memorization of linguistic material in terms of muscle relaxation and autogenic training // Problems. psychology. 1967. No. 1.
19. Sirovsky E. M. Intensification of the learning process at a higher scale using the complex-hypnotic method: abstract. dis. Cand. L., 1970.
20. Talyzina N. F. Managing the process of learning. M., 1975.
21. Talyzina N. F., Gabay T. V. Ways and means of automation of the educational process. M., 1977.
22. Uznadze D. N. Experimental foundations of psychology installation. Tbilisi, 1961.
23. Khachapuridze B. N. Activity experimentally formed susceptivity influences the subconscious sphere and its application to study // 1st international Symposium on problems of suggestology. Sofia, 1971.<