Forum

Some of the discs (tracks) can be converted to MP3 without losing effect? And are there any such in nature?

hmmm....still naaaaaaa to do FAQ... ... it is a good idea.

лилия wrote:hmmm....still naaaaaaa to do FAQ... ... it is a good idea.

Good idea to answer If you know! Not to be smart If offended I'm sorry.

yeah well, at least, for example, know here: http://www.mindmachine.ru/viewtopic.php ... &start=220
(13th post from the top )

And why mp3 ? Other formats do not? There are more effective algorithms for sound compression. The mp3 format is no longer relevant. Recently only compress to Ogg Vorbis. Even lab work done (for himself)... See on http://avbegunov.narod.ru/ in section the audio compression. And why do you compress the discs of the Master Sensei? With the current volumes of media a couple of WAV files will not take up much space.

And why mp3 ? Other formats do not? There are more effective algorithms for sound compression. The mp3 format is no longer relevant. Recently only compress to Ogg Vorbis. Even lab work done (for himself)... See on http://avbegunov.narod.ru/ in section the audio compression. And why do you compress the discs of the Master Sensei (squeeze another chenit)? With the current volumes of media a couple of WAV files will not take up much space.

Дендропоника wrote:why mp3 ? Other formats do not?

Because MP3 is played by the majority of devices - iPods, mobile phones etc. unlike OGG which, by the way, basically from nothing and MP3 is no different...

Дендропоника wrote:And why do you compress the discs of the Master Sensei (squeeze another chenit)? With the current volumes of media a couple of WAV files will not take up much space.

Use a lossless codec preserves the contents of a record bit-by-bit, but reduces the file size by 4 times.

Anonymous wrote:

Дендропоника wrote:why mp3 ? Other formats do not?

Because MP3 is played by the majority of devices - iPods, mobile phones etc. unlike OGG which, by the way, basically from nothing and MP3 is no different...

Дендропоника wrote:And why do you compress the discs of the Master Sensei (squeeze another chenit)? With the current volumes of media a couple of WAV files will not take up much space.

Use a lossless codec preserves the contents of a record bit-by-bit, but reduces the file size by 4 times.

Contradict yourself.
Propose to compress lossless codec as OGG not widely available (in Your words) except for computer and some other devices (TVIX from Dvico inc. for example).
I believe that the disks of the Master Sensei is better to WAV to listen. Good player supports WAV abound (take a look at molotok.ru khtb).

In fact, everyone decides for himself in what format to encode. Perhaps it would be good just in case to keep all the discs in several formats. Then you can listen to in any situation.
S,S, Forum stopped me to remember.

Good day to all!
I have a question about IPOD NANO 8G. In iTunes there is the ability to import in the Apple Lossless Codec. How is it different from FLAC?

Дендропоника wrote:why mp3 ? Other formats do not? There are more effective algorithms for sound compression. The mp3 format is no longer relevant. Recently only compress to Ogg Vorbis. Even lab work done (for himself)... See on http://avbegunov.narod.ru/ in section the audio compression. And why do you compress the discs of the Master Sensei (squeeze another chenit)? With the current volumes of media a couple of WAV files will not take up much space.

You don't say! So irrelevant! MCE player can be bought everywhere any size, color and manufacturer and carry with you everywhere. And do yourself advertising laboratory But one thing that's clear, that it is better not to compress or anything. I like listening to WAV files on PDA

Атомное сердце wrote:Good afternoon, everyone.
I have a question about IPOD NANO 8G. In iTunes there is the ability to import in the Apple Lossless Codec. How is it different from FLAC?

size.