SELF-HYPNOSIS AND PROPER GOAL SETTING

[Оранжевое Сон-Це]

Actually, there is such opinion (and I agree with him) that it is impossible to tell God exactly how he needs to take care of You.

I'm with him, too, in solidarity

So, I would say: "I enjoy the job that suited me in all respects".

Andrew, you are spoiled members of the forum and I'm including You give answers, after which you no longer want to think and look for yourself. Although I wrote a few more questions, I have started a mechanism of reflection, for that special thank you! (by the way, this view that "truth is one, but to each their own", what do you think?)

[Андрей Патрушев]

by the way, this view that "truth is one, but to each their own", what do you think?

It's a truism. it can be used for hypnotic guidance, for example...

[Оранжевое Сон-Це]

It's a truism. it can be used for hypnotic guidance, for example...

Forgive, for in conversation I meet this word for the first time and how it decided to respond don't know

In General, again, I wanted to write a question, citing the fact that thinking to anything didn't lead, but here the answer surfaced itself. In both!

[Евгений Кош]

Forgive, for in conversation I meet this word for the first time and how it decided to respond don't know

On truisms to respond not necessary, I usually call them "evil traps", use no and the brains of the uninitiated - loaded on the full.
this type
"there is happiness and everyone has their own".
"happiness is just a matter of the right choice."
and so.. now I can smell them a mile away.. this once "sensed" a truism - walk around such a person for 10 miles.. because nothing good from him do not expect.. well, or a truism on truism.. to finish off with his own weapon ( if the need of communication is necessary)...(say like "there are no people who don't make mistakes... people are not gods.. everyone has their own truth. etc...".. after that truisms from apponenta usually come to naught).

[Андрей Патрушев]

Forgive, for in conversation I meet this word for the first time and how it decided to respond don't know

On truisms to respond not necessary, I usually call them "evil traps", use no and the brains of the uninitiated - loaded on the full.
this type
"there is happiness and everyone has their own".
"happiness is just a matter of the right choice."
and so.. now I can smell them a mile away.. this once "sensed" a truism - walk around such a person for 10 miles.. because nothing good from him do not expect.. well, or a truism on truism.. to finish off with his own weapon ( if the need of communication is necessary)...(say like "there are no people who don't make mistakes... people are not gods.. everyone has their own truth. etc...".. after that truisms from apponenta usually come to naught).

Come on...
Some time spoken truisms of life saved...

[Оранжевое Сон-Це]

the truisms react not necessary, I usually call them "evil traps", use no and the brains of the uninitiated - loaded on the full.

and why are they evil then? I, for example, at this stage of development, yet age-old wisdom within themselves not felt for some help. For example, earlier when I read on the forums (where he crashed) point to radically divergent from my own, joined in the debate, and almost always proved wrong opponent . Then, understand that is neither right nor wrong point of view in this matter can not be, and could save some time and nerves, simply writing a "to each his own". Now I do not get into an argument, and if someone enforces them, avoid such phrases. So, there are benefits and no brains ship

Just, IMHO, it's one thing when a truism is used in the conversation, after similar phrases already and there is nothing to say in response exchange of views may be over. And so - personally, for myself, at home... why not. It is necessary to stick around until it is "clarity of being" Some people over a lifetime sayings, and Proverbs of rukovodstvuyutsya and nothing can live and enjoy Each W its

[Евгений Кош]

Come on...
Some truisms of life saved...

In good hands - Yes.
the negative I have ... I guess once I have someone still cheated ( I think probably).. as they do not turn - everywhere they can be inserted and which is suitable in the current situation you will not understand..
for example one person had to stay away ( aggressive, provocateur).. and you truism "we are all human, we are all people.. no people with no errors".. and suffer.. and in the end it turned out the problem was even more.. it was necessary to protect themselves from these "people" .. and not to believe the truism..
In General - all in one.. in the hands of a doctor saves a scalpel in the hands of a killer - kills..

[Евгений Кош]

the truisms react not necessary, I usually call them "evil traps", use no and the brains of the uninitiated - loaded on the full.

and why are they evil then? I, for example, at this stage of development, yet age-old wisdom within themselves not felt for some help. For example, earlier when I read on the forums (where he crashed) point to radically divergent from my own, joined in the debate, and almost always proved wrong opponent . Then, understand that is neither right nor wrong point of view in this matter can not be, and could save some time and nerves, simply writing a "to each his own". Now I do not get into an argument, and if someone enforces them, avoid such phrases. So, there are benefits and no brains ship

Just, IMHO, it's one thing when a truism is used in the conversation, after similar phrases already and there is nothing to say in response exchange of views may be over. And so - personally, for myself, at home... why not. It is necessary to stick around until it is "clarity of being" Some people over a lifetime sayings, and Proverbs of rukovodstvuyutsya and nothing can live and enjoy Each W its

If the result is to reduce the debate to "each his own", then started on and stopped.. was a strange sense to engage in polemics. in the end, that nothing has changed. But if was a goal or to gain new knowledge, or to give anyone knowledge, then the debate would be law by the consent of one of the parties.. and is a waste of time if going sagacity controversy "to each his own".
I'm not talking about the truisms.. and about the example.
I have nothing against truisms.. I'm just saying that this is a trap.. which can be used in good and evil.

[Евгений Кош]

please help me with the correct wording of the phrase according to the method of Sedona, for the program "rainbow".

Want to let go of resistance to change my behavior for the better for me side.

That re-read several times the phrase top.. and you know what - it kind of inaccurate..
Accurate can't figure out.. for several weeks ..

[Андрей Патрушев]

please help me with the correct wording of the phrase according to the method of Sedona, for the program "rainbow".

Want to let go of resistance to change my behavior for the better for me side.

That re-read several times the phrase top.. and you know what - it kind of inaccurate..
Accurate can't figure out.. for several weeks ..

And You want to want to let go or just let go?

[Евгений Кош]

please help me with the correct wording of the phrase according to the method of Sedona, for the program "rainbow".

Want to let go of resistance to change my behavior for the better for me side.

That re-read several times the phrase top.. and you know what - it kind of inaccurate..
Accurate can't figure out.. for several weeks ..

And You want to want to let go or just let go?

Yes, wrong word
preliminary version:
"let go of resistance to my changes is the best way for me"
The phrase is ambiguous, it turns out.. I want to say that
let go of resistance to change which will change me for the better for me side."
here, in a similar vein.

[Андрей Патрушев]

please help me with the correct wording of the phrase according to the method of Sedona, for the program "rainbow".

Want to let go of resistance to change my behavior for the better for me side.

That re-read several times the phrase top.. and you know what - it kind of inaccurate..
Accurate can't figure out.. for several weeks ..

And You want to want to let go or just let go?

Yes, wrong word
preliminary version:
"let go of resistance to my changes is the best way for me"
The phrase is ambiguous, it turns out.. I want to say that
let go of resistance to change which will change me for the better for me side."
here, in a similar vein.

Okay, second question:
You are going life let go of your resistance, or still just let him go?

[Андрей Патрушев]

Sorry, I'm not jiving, just someone I've got reproached that I give everything on a silver platter, they say and think about yourself you can't.

[Евгений Кош]

Okay, second question:
You are going life let go of your resistance, or still just let him go?
Sorry, I'm not jiving, just someone I've got reproached that I give everything on a silver platter, they say and think about yourself you can't.

.. From the perspective of "estebania" I didn't even think
for some reason, I identified Your writing style that You seriously went to my messages and try to help me.
"let go of resistance to change, which I change for the better for me side" (best way for me).

[Андрей Патрушев]

Third question:
Do You trust yourself (the deep wisdom)? In other words - not too detail You show God that he need to do for You?

[ШДен]

Okay, second question:
You are going life let go of your resistance, or still just let him go?
Sorry, I'm not jiving, just someone I've got reproached that I give everything on a silver platter, they say and think about yourself you can't.

.. From the perspective of "estebania" I didn't even think
for some reason, I identified Your writing style that You seriously went to my messages and try to help me.
"let go of resistance to change, which I change for the better for me side" (best way for me).

I think it is better not to use the word "let", "resistance" etc. etc.
But rather something like: "I'm open-minded" and (or) "my life is going just the right event," Well, something in this way
BUT!!! It is also not a ready answer

[Евгений Кош]

Okay, second question:
You are going life let go of your resistance, or still just let him go?
Sorry, I'm not jiving, just someone I've got reproached that I give everything on a silver platter, they say and think about yourself you can't.

.. From the perspective of "estebania" I didn't even think
for some reason, I identified Your writing style that You seriously went to my messages and try to help me.
"let go of resistance to change, which I change for the better for me side" (best way for me).

I think it is better not to use the word "let", "resistance" etc. etc.
But rather something like: "I'm open-minded" and (or) "my life is going just the right event," Well, something in this way
BUT!!! It is also not a ready answer

You are about affirmations..
And I'm talking about Sedona method

[Евгений Кош]

the Third question:
Do You trust yourself (the deep wisdom)? In other words - not too detail You show God that he need to do for You?

Here and the dog rummaged
I used the rainbow worked with the phrase "I let go of resistance to change". However, an inner feeling that it is not complete.
changes - how? I want to change about yourself? eye color? health? to improve communicative behavior? to improve memory?


I mean, I've been on the forum was a discussion - "do not specify to God HOW to make so-and-so for .. and specify exactly what you want."

For this now I have a misunderstanding of the algorithm for constructing sentences-objectives.
on the one hand not to say how to do, and now it turns out not to clarify - what I'm asking.?

[Андрей Патрушев]

the Third question:
Do You trust yourself (the deep wisdom)? In other words - not too detail You show God that he need to do for You?

Here and the dog rummaged
I used the rainbow worked with the phrase "I let go of resistance to change". However, an inner feeling that it is not complete.
changes - how? I want to change about yourself? eye color? health? to improve communicative behavior? to improve memory?


I mean, I've been on the forum was a discussion - "do not specify to God HOW to make so-and-so for .. and specify exactly what you want."

For this now I have a misunderstanding of the algorithm for constructing sentences-objectives.
on the one hand not to say how to do, and now it turns out not to clarify - what I'm asking.?

Although I do agree with Denom, but continued to play by Your rules. When I asked, do You trust yourself, it is meant that changes can be: necessary, good, positive, timely, generative... (fill in and select what you like).

[Евгений Кош]

Although I do agree with Denom, but continued to play by Your rules. When I asked, do You trust yourself, it is meant that changes can be: necessary, good, positive, timely, generative... (fill in and select what you like).

1.Maybe then Sedona method in this case is not applicable?
2. it turns out that "I let go of resistance to positive change."

Andrew, Sten, thank you for help..
Understand that sometimes assistance is needed from outside to break the deadlock.

[ШДен]

Andrew, Sten, thank you for help..
Understand that sometimes assistance is needed from outside to break the deadlock.

Yes, you're welcome
When helping yourself as well to become

You are about affirmations..
And I'm talking about Sedona method Smile

Then of course, I misheard, but I think that affirmations that the Sedona method are based still on the "Proper goal setting" and one of the main principles is to use only positive statements and NOT to use the words no, NO, in General, negative statements
Everything in this world is interconnected I here, for example, when I started to read Natalia Pravdin (now it is certainly primitive, but without it I think not attach importance the Philosophy of Positive Thinking), not understood and not noticed in other texts the principles and connection with the FPM, and did not understand how this can work, but now when I read anything from "smart" to clearly see that everything is interconnected and, in principle, operates under the same laws!. Just describes different expressions, methods, and from different sides
About how He would have read, probably nothing would have understood

[вероника]

If in connection with the Sedona method, can add the word "now" - "I now let go of the resistance to the positive changes in my life"?

[Андрей Патрушев]

If in connection with the Sedona method, can add the word "now" - "I now let go of the resistance to the positive changes in my life"?

In the right hemisphere is always "now", so it can be a lifetime to let go. "I let go of resistance to positive change" seems to be correct, but a little something missing in the rhythm of the phrase, to my ears.

[Андрей Патрушев]

Now in terms of the strategic approach within the framework of FPM. Resistance at the domestic level does not exist in principle. There are limitations in the decent and effective ways of behavior of some parts of the personality responsible for the implementation of Your deep inner values.
Sedona method has limitations in application.
In my opinion, it is possible to apply, if you have something to deliver instead of over-the-counter...

[вероника]

"I let go of resistance to positive change" seems to be correct, but a little something missing in the rhythm of the phrase, to my ears.

I thought that phrase should be built at the present time. Missed something, I'll look for:wiz