[/quote]Андрей Патрушев wrote:With athletes engaged in by the method of transcranial electrostimulation.
Stimulation is weak currents with a certain frequency.Александр_ wrote:Андрей Патрушев wrote:With athletes engaged in by the method of transcranial electrostimulation.
Otocenie better to do in the theta state, but alpha is also quite suitable. Use the session L3.
Thank you.
I wanted to ask about transcranial electrostimulation.
As I understand it - is stimulation of the brain, but not the frequencies, and currents.
Right ?
Therefore, to simulate enerpulse do I ?
The funny thing is that the meaning is well understood WITHOUT the use of the above words...лилия wrote:Demetrius
no words...
a vivid example of turn when not knowing the meaning of words apart, the result is still exactly understood the meaning... but somehow bypassing all before primenyaemye thinking process... Bravo!
Thank you!!!!
Interestingly,Demetrius in life just talking...?(and goes without bruises???!!! 
)
I had imagined a dark pimply teenager,suffering from a lack of communication and the impossibility of self-realization,sitting out all of your precious time on the network trying though is there to win the respect and recognition of their personality,vykovyrivat dictionary of buzzwords and transferring them in the vast sitebase network.
You literally ahead of me, I just went to the forum and thought about this ideaДеметрий wrote:вероника wrote:Dimas wrote(a):
How many of us brains,and kind of sense,but why so MANY???...Will understand!
Well, that's clear.
Dimas wrote:
Yes, to understand something sorted, it would still brain a little bit.
Who,Veronica??вероника wrote:Деметрий wrote:You literally ahead of me, I just went to the forum and thought about this ideaвероника wrote:Dimas wrote(a):
How many of us brains,and kind of sense,but why so MANY???...Will understand!
Well, that's clear.Dimas wrote:
Yes, to understand something sorted, it would still brain a little bit.
Hi, Demetrius.Деметрий wrote:Greetings to all of You. Saw that on this forum absolutely do not say Hello lately, it is sad, this is the leitmotif of expression of young people. I hope that these things are ephemeral. Andrew, at the moment it is difficult for me to find a certain eclecticism in Your narrative, because in the centre of Tomatis (European) I answered the question the opportunity to listen to the tracks with this effect on the mp3 positively, if there is no other way. Even called a few locations in our Capital city-Mother Moscow, where you can buy CDs of Tomatis in mp3. As You explicitate? Not an aberration of it? Your statement sounded very definiowane and simple and did not reflect the answer to the question that is required to be followed based on an elementary syllogism. Simply put, you called the antecedent, and about the consequent silence. But in order not to lose time, I inquired about this colleague, doctor of physical and mathematical Sciences. Will not be able to accurately convey his thoughts and words, but the fraction pokerbay. A priori, say, that we are not talking about the total preservation of the effect of listening rather minor losses in high frequency sound. So, in this case of a possible empirical experience and data analysis coding in mp3 format, on a topic which you have not answered satisfactorily. Here is the role of abduction, though it is highly relative, but the argument is on the face. If you quantisierung quality codec transforming the flow, even more segments of the frame side sample rate from 32000 periods of oscillations/sec, and knowing that, having exposed the maximum so-called cutting line, a compression algorithm/mp3 encoding is canceled, any frequency above 18kHz, so in that regard, the parity falls to differences in a huge segment of the segmentation frames. Therefore, I have a preliminary finding, if it is not the case with the effect of the Tomatis above 16 thousand periods of oscillations/sec, the assurances of the Tomatis centre is not practiced, then the quality and efficiency we lose not critical, and moreover, lose absolutely the same as in binaural beats. We even conducted a Fourier analysis and came to the conclusion that no harmonic resonance or periodiska fluctuations is not lost, as the whole discrete spectrum at sample rates from 32000, as already noted. Range of the same sound pulse took place in the loss of efficiency, but we noticed some interference sinusoidal "spherical" on the rise. Formants also not changed empirically. Approximately so, probably a lot missing, it looks. Essence because one, if you take the CBR, then there is no room for abstractions, and therefore it is necessary to take into account any psychoacoustic model, because it always varies. Also, Snelly if to actualize the experiences of Alfred Tomatis, the refraction very had its "existence", so flat, unlike the spherical, is not distorted because the refraction of the incident is not superimposed on a sine wave is flat. Elementary spherical wave front is also left perfect. The width of the bands picked up correctly as the locator. All of this took quite a bit of time, though, and looks awesome. The results, of course, was obtained by using entropic compression methods, mp3 constant bitrate of 256kbps, sampling 32000Hz. Respectful request to Andrei Patrushev is not suitable counterpart, deployed and convincingly apologeomai their point of view. Devaluation without any empiricism always possible to arrange. Health and all blah to You. Sincerely, DemetriusАндрей Патрушев wrote:All programs with high frequency components can not compress mp3's without loss of efficiency. But there are programs where only the binaural beats, it is possible, without any problems. In the above quote You it was about disk Ultramesh.
I write here,because I work in this project,though not from the beginning...Your forgiveness the least need in the world(and in someone else other than their parents)...Hormones are raging,and how (I am very happy,and I certainly almost 28 and look themselves wrote how much),probably unlike Your...and do not rage in vain (maybe You can guess what I mean,though maybe You've already forgotten what IT was 
) I lead an active way of life,and the ' net are included because you have something to say and have something to take for yourself of Acne and never did,and thank God...And the expression of Your thoughts rich,as You have allowed yourself to speak,the language suggests just the fact that You have no respect for and despise its potential and actual interlocutors,numericas flaunt your mind (or rather, the lack thereof) with the aim to humiliate and show the inferiority and stupidity of the latter (and it's not like filling their own inferiority complex?,although at your age...is only negligent to teach the young people wisdom a sigh of Pushkin and Dahl...that in our time...often hear this phrase from the old ladies at the entrance).Fortunately,my life is very lucky and I spoke with a large number imenityh and intelligent people with many distinguished regalia and none of them boasted of their titles,and even having the ability to Express their thoughts through clever and not always understandable words,they could not afford,as was ethical enough and tolerable (and if you want humane) in relation to those around them.If they say,in narrow circles.And VERY WISELY,unlike You,Dear Professor. Philosopher. Psychologist. A linguist by the name of Demetrius. Hi, Demetrius.Деметрий wrote:Hello, Andrew. I have heard from many that it is not always mp3 cut algorithm starting from 15kHz, 18kHz mostly, but it's all relative and depends on the situation as a whole. And thank you for the comments You information about the frequency of programs up to 20kHz, I didn't know that and will take note. It turns out that we are dealing with the loss of efficiency in the range from 2kHz (for my information) and up to 5kHz (for your). These figures don't critically essential to judge the loss of any effect. In any case, thanks for Your reply. I apologize if I am your opus distract You and Rob You of precious life time.
