
Ring. Workshop
- Шалтай Балтай
- Разработчик
- Posts:3392
- Joined:Tue Sep 01, 2009 12:22
Re: The Ring. Workshop
In! this is fun stuff, Kuvak 3,5 Sacred of Bronzovy braids:

the sound it has but not strong, the video will not be heard

the sound it has but not strong, the video will not be heard
- Шалтай Балтай
- Разработчик
- Posts:3392
- Joined:Tue Sep 01, 2009 12:22
Re: The Ring. Workshop
also, very tijelo is


- Шалтай Балтай
- Разработчик
- Posts:3392
- Joined:Tue Sep 01, 2009 12:22
Re: The Ring. Workshop
Ring in Bronze


- Шалтай Балтай
- Разработчик
- Posts:3392
- Joined:Tue Sep 01, 2009 12:22
Re: The Ring. Workshop
Ring Pigtail-3, Copper


- Шалтай Балтай
- Разработчик
- Posts:3392
- Joined:Tue Sep 01, 2009 12:22
Re: The Ring. Workshop
Good zdraveska, Patrick
To be honest, the structure in which are assembled the ring is not entirely clear.
Looks like 3 rings collected into a ball, through the meridians, with two points of Peresecina, it's like the slim, but there is also a 4th ring, which would be parallel/equator relative to 3M Meridian, he got confused while writing
In addition, a design as if "lying on its side". It's interesting, you know, what was the source for this design?
Further, a ring Left irons, and Kuvak - right.
Seams, this soldering or what? or is it welded? Looks like tin but is made the butt joint. Che, I was puzzled....
flooded epoxy?
To be honest, the structure in which are assembled the ring is not entirely clear.
Looks like 3 rings collected into a ball, through the meridians, with two points of Peresecina, it's like the slim, but there is also a 4th ring, which would be parallel/equator relative to 3M Meridian, he got confused while writing
Further, a ring Left irons, and Kuvak - right.
Seams, this soldering or what? or is it welded? Looks like tin but is made the butt joint. Che, I was puzzled....
what is the 5th merc?Патрик wrote:kuvak 5 merc
flooded epoxy?
Re: The Ring. Workshop
Good zdraveska dear Humpty. I'll start smallШалтай Балтай wrote:Good zdraveska, Patrick
To be honest, the structure in which are assembled the ring is not entirely clear.
Looks like 3 rings collected into a ball, through the meridians, with two points of Peresecina, it's like the slim, but there is also a 4th ring, which would be parallel/equator relative to 3M Meridian, he got confused while writing![]()
In addition, a design as if "lying on its side". It's interesting, you know, what was the source for this design?
Further, a ring Left irons, and Kuvak - right.
Seams, this soldering or what? or is it welded? Looks like tin but is made the butt joint. Che, I was puzzled....
what is the 5th merc?Патрик wrote:kuvak 5 merc![]()
flooded epoxy?
Re: The Ring. Workshop
Malik waiting for your opinion
Thank you 
Re: The Ring. Workshop
Feelings go only in the top of the head. Probably the frequency characteristics. But IMHO when vesch work with the whole body feeling more harmonious and nicer like that. Be careful with such devices, so there was no bias.
- Шалтай Балтай
- Разработчик
- Posts:3392
- Joined:Tue Sep 01, 2009 12:22
Re: The Ring. Workshop
Патрик wrote:Size kuweka 2616
Oh, this is the fifth mercМерКаБа wrote:Feelings from go only in the top of the head
in tto Etto (2,616.2) closest to 3.5 New Measurements (if the "standara"), Siscovick the Besh: 2,565.5
maybe so, and sensations in the upper part
PS
+ Left-right Curling device, somewhat alarming
I am not a supporter of these "cool" features.
- Шалтай Балтай
- Разработчик
- Posts:3392
- Joined:Tue Sep 01, 2009 12:22
Re: The Ring. Workshop
if I understand the design correctly, IMHO - variant workerПатрик wrote:Dismantled to hell
but Kuvak I'd altered.
- Шалтай Балтай
- Разработчик
- Posts:3392
- Joined:Tue Sep 01, 2009 12:22
Re: The Ring. Workshop
Here me is the question regarding the errors of the Sacred standards.
I have an idea to work with linear measurements, That AK would be to understand how exactly to cut them ....
I have an idea to work with linear measurements, That AK would be to understand how exactly to cut them ....
Re: The Ring. Workshop
Good day, Patrick!Патрик wrote:Malik waiting for your opinion Thank you
Sorry did not answer immediately.
See, I saw immediately, as soon as You have posted photos, but see nothing, so I thought that because of the substance, which was the harmonizer, it (the substance) somehow killed my perception.
- Иван Славов
- Posts:979
- Joined:Mon Apr 27, 2015 11:35
Re: The Ring. Workshop
According to my perceptions of the product in the photo /in the court of epoxide/ works, it is likely to be perceived as "strong" and "powerful" for most people. However, as already accepted as a "pattern expression" - if you look at harmony - then no, not in harmony.
Patrick, allow me to ask - what was used during the solidification epoxide? Is something wrong with the BJ?
Patrick, allow me to ask - what was used during the solidification epoxide? Is something wrong with the BJ?
- Шалтай Балтай
- Разработчик
- Posts:3392
- Joined:Tue Sep 01, 2009 12:22
Re: The Ring. Workshop
For the sake of experiment, put
we get the following picture:

it is seen that the dependence is actually linear, although the New Merc's as if "dipped"
- What? You ask?
- sort of, and yet anything, I will answer
- for X - length of Sacral Measurements in inches
- to y according to their frequency
Code: Select all
Cubit | Inch | MHz
Sacred | 20.63 | 144
Lost | 23.49 | 177
New | 28.86 | 188
SH | 39.31 | 333
T | 77.56 | 764

it is seen that the dependence is actually linear, although the New Merc's as if "dipped"
- What? You ask?
- sort of, and yet anything, I will answer
Re: The Ring. Workshop
Thank you all a big experiment I finished .
On the advice of Humpty , the design will remain ,kuvak new will be classics ,that I deleted ,myzh for harmony
Cesare Hello.I haven't used BJ the technology ,I activated during curing just dumaetsya that peoxide and pojiratelei
and the manufacturing process itself was very interesting 
- Шалтай Балтай
- Разработчик
- Posts:3392
- Joined:Tue Sep 01, 2009 12:22
Re: The Ring. Workshop
respect! it's a business conversation. Is there a defect? - Took and remade. Without further ADO. This is a man!Патрик wrote:On the advice of Humpty , the design will remain ,kuvak new will be classics ,that I deleted
PS
I would advise and strengthen (if you decide) vertically, why it would seem that torroid on the side to put?
- Шалтай Балтай
- Разработчик
- Posts:3392
- Joined:Tue Sep 01, 2009 12:22
Re: The Ring. Workshop
Play with exterpassive
It's all nonsense, of course, just for the sake of exercise:

It's all nonsense, of course, just for the sake of exercise:
Code: Select all
| | | K:L/S | % Deviation | K:SH/S | % Deviation | K:T/S | % Deviation
Cubit | Inch | MHz| 11.538 | | 10.118 | | 10.891 |
Sacred| 20.63 | 144.0 | 144.0 | 0.0 | 144.0 | 0.0 | 144.0 | 0.0
Lost| 23.49 | 177.0 | 177.0 | 0.0 | 172.9 | 2.3 | 175.1 | 1.1
New| 28.86 | 188.0 | 239.0 | 21.3 | 227.3 | 17.3 | 233.6 | 19.5
SH| 39.31 | 333.0 | 359.5 | 7.4 | 333.0 | 0.0 | 347.4 | 4.2
T| 77.56 | 764.0 | 800.9 | 4.6 | 720.0 | 6.1 | 764.0 | 0.0
| | | | 33.3 | | 25.7 | | 24.7

Re: The Ring. Workshop
Honestly Humpty, I think that accuracy is only important when there are several elements in the design. The closer the accuracy in size of all parts, the better the resonance between them and, accordingly, the total power from the product. And yet, perhaps, when products are very small rings in the form of a pendant. And in other cases, I think you can assume a reasonable error and not to bother.Шалтай Балтай wrote:Here I took the question regarding the errors of the Sacred standards.
I have an idea to work with linear measurements, That AK would be to understand how exactly to cut them ....
- Шалтай Балтай
- Разработчик
- Posts:3392
- Joined:Tue Sep 01, 2009 12:22
Re: The Ring. Workshop
Good zdraveska, Merkaba
in the figures only, and not about generally, and preferably justified.
For example, Brian devisen - rezhit seem to micron
it is unlikely, of a product of linear terms - just cut the copper rod, but made.МерКаБа wrote:precision is only important when there are several elements in the design
it is clear, the smaller the product, the less margin of error, who can argueМерКаБа wrote:when products are very small rings in the form of a pendant.
and what is it?МерКаБа wrote:I think you can assume a reasonable margin of error
For example, Brian devisen - rezhit seem to micron




