Ring. Workshop

User avatar
Шалтай Балтай
Разработчик
Posts:3392
Joined:Tue Sep 01, 2009 12:22
Re: The Ring. Workshop

Post by Шалтай Балтай » Sun Sep 11, 2016 22:11

Image

User avatar
Шалтай Балтай
Разработчик
Posts:3392
Joined:Tue Sep 01, 2009 12:22

Re: The Ring. Workshop

Post by Шалтай Балтай » Sun Sep 11, 2016 22:11

Image

User avatar
Шалтай Балтай
Разработчик
Posts:3392
Joined:Tue Sep 01, 2009 12:22

Re: The Ring. Workshop

Post by Шалтай Балтай » Sun Sep 11, 2016 22:13

In! this is fun stuff, Kuvak 3,5 Sacred of Bronzovy braids:
Image
the sound it has but not strong, the video will not be heard

User avatar
Шалтай Балтай
Разработчик
Posts:3392
Joined:Tue Sep 01, 2009 12:22

Re: The Ring. Workshop

Post by Шалтай Балтай » Sun Sep 11, 2016 22:13

also, very tijelo is :(
Image

User avatar
Шалтай Балтай
Разработчик
Posts:3392
Joined:Tue Sep 01, 2009 12:22

Re: The Ring. Workshop

Post by Шалтай Балтай » Sun Sep 11, 2016 22:14

Ring in Bronze
Image

User avatar
Шалтай Балтай
Разработчик
Posts:3392
Joined:Tue Sep 01, 2009 12:22

Re: The Ring. Workshop

Post by Шалтай Балтай » Sun Sep 11, 2016 22:15

Ring Pigtail-3, Copper
Image

Патрик
Posts:42
Joined:Tue Oct 20, 2015 12:07

Re: The Ring. Workshop

Post by Патрик » Tue Sep 13, 2016 23:00

[imImage

Image

g][/img]
Accordion smastyrili .Rings 1 scoop ,kuvak 5 merc .Thickness 3 mm . Check it out :)

User avatar
Шалтай Балтай
Разработчик
Posts:3392
Joined:Tue Sep 01, 2009 12:22

Re: The Ring. Workshop

Post by Шалтай Балтай » Wed Sep 14, 2016 16:57

Good zdraveska, Patrick
To be honest, the structure in which are assembled the ring is not entirely clear.
Looks like 3 rings collected into a ball, through the meridians, with two points of Peresecina, it's like the slim, but there is also a 4th ring, which would be parallel/equator relative to 3M Meridian, he got confused while writing :roll: :) In addition, a design as if "lying on its side". It's interesting, you know, what was the source for this design?
Further, a ring Left irons, and Kuvak - right.
Seams, this soldering or what? or is it welded? Looks like tin but is made the butt joint. Che, I was puzzled.... :roll:
Патрик wrote:kuvak 5 merc
what is the 5th merc? :shock:
flooded epoxy?

Патрик
Posts:42
Joined:Tue Oct 20, 2015 12:07

Re: The Ring. Workshop

Post by Патрик » Thu Sep 15, 2016 1:07

Шалтай Балтай wrote:Good zdraveska, Patrick
To be honest, the structure in which are assembled the ring is not entirely clear.
Looks like 3 rings collected into a ball, through the meridians, with two points of Peresecina, it's like the slim, but there is also a 4th ring, which would be parallel/equator relative to 3M Meridian, he got confused while writing :roll: :) In addition, a design as if "lying on its side". It's interesting, you know, what was the source for this design?
Further, a ring Left irons, and Kuvak - right.
Seams, this soldering or what? or is it welded? Looks like tin but is made the butt joint. Che, I was puzzled.... :roll:
Патрик wrote:kuvak 5 merc
what is the 5th merc? :shock:
flooded epoxy?
Good zdraveska dear Humpty. I'll start small :) done by connecting to the channel of the slim, but not the fact 8) The structure is assembled in a state of silence, can IZMENENY :roll: The creation :wizSize is not my :evil: Very much thrashed by top centers :) No need to repeat. But the device is power :wizYou can boil butt soft solder!Yes the epoxy :)

Патрик
Posts:42
Joined:Tue Oct 20, 2015 12:07

Re: The Ring. Workshop

Post by Патрик » Thu Sep 15, 2016 1:09

Malik waiting for your opinion :) Thank you bi

Патрик
Posts:42
Joined:Tue Oct 20, 2015 12:07

Re: The Ring. Workshop

Post by Патрик » Thu Sep 15, 2016 8:52

Size kuweka 2616 :)

МерКаБа
Posts:844
Joined:Wed Aug 19, 2009 21:38

Re: The Ring. Workshop

Post by МерКаБа » Thu Sep 15, 2016 11:38

Feelings go only in the top of the head. Probably the frequency characteristics. But IMHO when vesch work with the whole body feeling more harmonious and nicer like that. Be careful with such devices, so there was no bias.

User avatar
Шалтай Балтай
Разработчик
Posts:3392
Joined:Tue Sep 01, 2009 12:22

Re: The Ring. Workshop

Post by Шалтай Балтай » Thu Sep 15, 2016 11:47

Патрик wrote:Size kuweka 2616
МерКаБа wrote:Feelings from go only in the top of the head
Oh, this is the fifth merc :)
in tto Etto (2,616.2) closest to 3.5 New Measurements (if the "standara"), Siscovick the Besh: 2,565.5
maybe so, and sensations in the upper part :?

PS
+ Left-right Curling device, somewhat alarming :oops:
I am not a supporter of these "cool" features. 8)

Патрик
Posts:42
Joined:Tue Oct 20, 2015 12:07

Re: The Ring. Workshop

Post by Патрик » Thu Sep 15, 2016 12:19

Dismantled to hell :aa

User avatar
Шалтай Балтай
Разработчик
Posts:3392
Joined:Tue Sep 01, 2009 12:22

Re: The Ring. Workshop

Post by Шалтай Балтай » Thu Sep 15, 2016 12:22

Патрик wrote:Dismantled to hell
if I understand the design correctly, IMHO - variant worker
but Kuvak I'd altered.

User avatar
Шалтай Балтай
Разработчик
Posts:3392
Joined:Tue Sep 01, 2009 12:22

Re: The Ring. Workshop

Post by Шалтай Балтай » Thu Sep 15, 2016 13:03

Here me is the question regarding the errors of the Sacred standards.
I have an idea to work with linear measurements, That AK would be to understand how exactly to cut them ....

User avatar
Малика
Posts:681
Joined:Fri Jan 08, 2010 19:11

Re: The Ring. Workshop

Post by Малика » Thu Sep 15, 2016 13:16

Патрик wrote:Malik waiting for your opinion Thank you
Good day, Patrick!
Sorry did not answer immediately.
See, I saw immediately, as soon as You have posted photos, but see nothing, so I thought that because of the substance, which was the harmonizer, it (the substance) somehow killed my perception.

User avatar
Иван Славов
Posts:979
Joined:Mon Apr 27, 2015 11:35

Re: The Ring. Workshop

Post by Иван Славов » Thu Sep 15, 2016 13:28

According to my perceptions of the product in the photo /in the court of epoxide/ works, it is likely to be perceived as "strong" and "powerful" for most people. However, as already accepted as a "pattern expression" - if you look at harmony - then no, not in harmony.

Patrick, allow me to ask - what was used during the solidification epoxide? Is something wrong with the BJ?

User avatar
Шалтай Балтай
Разработчик
Posts:3392
Joined:Tue Sep 01, 2009 12:22

Re: The Ring. Workshop

Post by Шалтай Балтай » Thu Sep 15, 2016 14:48

For the sake of experiment, put
  • for X - length of Sacral Measurements in inches
  • to y according to their frequency

Code: Select all

Cubit | Inch | MHz
Sacred | 20.63 | 144
Lost | 23.49 | 177
New | 28.86 | 188
SH | 39.31 | 333
T | 77.56 | 764
we get the following picture:
Image

it is seen that the dependence is actually linear, although the New Merc's as if "dipped"

- What? You ask?
- sort of, and yet anything, I will answer :?

Патрик
Posts:42
Joined:Tue Oct 20, 2015 12:07

Re: The Ring. Workshop

Post by Патрик » Thu Sep 15, 2016 15:38

Thank you all a big experiment I finished . :) On the advice of Humpty , the design will remain ,kuvak new will be classics ,that I deleted ,myzh for harmony :) Cesare Hello.I haven't used BJ the technology ,I activated during curing just dumaetsya that peoxide and pojiratelei :) and the manufacturing process itself was very interesting :wiz

User avatar
Шалтай Балтай
Разработчик
Posts:3392
Joined:Tue Sep 01, 2009 12:22

Re: The Ring. Workshop

Post by Шалтай Балтай » Thu Sep 15, 2016 15:54

Патрик wrote:On the advice of Humpty , the design will remain ,kuvak new will be classics ,that I deleted
respect! it's a business conversation. Is there a defect? - Took and remade. Without further ADO. This is a man! az

PS
I would advise and strengthen (if you decide) vertically, why it would seem that torroid on the side to put? :?

User avatar
Шалтай Балтай
Разработчик
Posts:3392
Joined:Tue Sep 01, 2009 12:22

Re: The Ring. Workshop

Post by Шалтай Балтай » Thu Sep 15, 2016 16:24

Play with exterpassive
It's all nonsense, of course, just for the sake of exercise:

Code: Select all

 | | | K:L/S | % Deviation | K:SH/S | % Deviation | K:T/S | % Deviation
Cubit | Inch | MHz| 11.538 | | 10.118 | | 10.891 | 
Sacred| 20.63 | 144.0 | 144.0 | 0.0 | 144.0 | 0.0 | 144.0 | 0.0
Lost| 23.49 | 177.0 | 177.0 | 0.0 | 172.9 | 2.3 | 175.1 | 1.1
New| 28.86 | 188.0 | 239.0 | 21.3 | 227.3 | 17.3 | 233.6 | 19.5
SH| 39.31 | 333.0 | 359.5 | 7.4 | 333.0 | 0.0 | 347.4 | 4.2
T| 77.56 | 764.0 | 800.9 | 4.6 | 720.0 | 6.1 | 764.0 | 0.0
 | | | | 33.3 | | 25.7 | | 24.7


Image

МерКаБа
Posts:844
Joined:Wed Aug 19, 2009 21:38

Re: The Ring. Workshop

Post by МерКаБа » Thu Sep 15, 2016 20:06

Шалтай Балтай wrote:Here I took the question regarding the errors of the Sacred standards.
I have an idea to work with linear measurements, That AK would be to understand how exactly to cut them ....
Honestly Humpty, I think that accuracy is only important when there are several elements in the design. The closer the accuracy in size of all parts, the better the resonance between them and, accordingly, the total power from the product. And yet, perhaps, when products are very small rings in the form of a pendant. And in other cases, I think you can assume a reasonable error and not to bother. :)

User avatar
Шалтай Балтай
Разработчик
Posts:3392
Joined:Tue Sep 01, 2009 12:22

Re: The Ring. Workshop

Post by Шалтай Балтай » Thu Sep 15, 2016 21:17

Good zdraveska, Merkaba
МерКаБа wrote:precision is only important when there are several elements in the design
it is unlikely, of a product of linear terms - just cut the copper rod, but made.
МерКаБа wrote:when products are very small rings in the form of a pendant.
it is clear, the smaller the product, the less margin of error, who can argue
МерКаБа wrote:I think you can assume a reasonable margin of error
and what is it? :) in the figures only, and not about generally, and preferably justified.

For example, Brian devisen - rezhit seem to micron 8)

Патрик
Posts:42
Joined:Tue Oct 20, 2015 12:07

Re: The Ring. Workshop

Post by Патрик » Thu Sep 15, 2016 21:34

Image

Image
3.5 size :)

Post Reply