As one American scientist in Copenhagen visited the eminent physicist, Nobel laureate Niels Bohr, and was quite surprised when the Desk found a horseshoe, firmly nailed to the wall, as expected, the open side facing upwards to catch luck and gave it to spill out.
American scientist nervously asked:
"Surely you don't believe that horseshoe will bring you good luck, do you, Professor Bohr? In the end, as the wise scientist..."
Niels Bohr, chuckling, said:
"My dear friend, anything similar I do not believe did not believe. And it is unlikely that I ever believed such blatant nonsense. However, I was told that a horseshoe brings good luck whether you believe it or not".
=============================================================================
мимоходом wrote:the human Psyche is arranged so that a person can apply to anyone, even the deceased. And he will respond positively. Actually channeling is when the man himself asks questions and he answers.
Do not question , do not defend someone's point of view, just my thoughts out loud.
If the questioner is able priyant information mental, the verbal voice is not needed. But often when you contact the Respondent uses the vocal apparatus of the questioner. In such cases, the contact record as the contact at the end of the session may not remember the details.
Himself asks himself responsible....it is the job of the subconscious or recapitulation of the past... or sneak peek into the future ...the essence is the same.
And contact with the dead , with entities of different levels and order, with Fine plans can be achieved in different ways. And it exists))))
мимоходом wrote:slim Sparling is exactly the same sect, like the sect Hubbard (Scientologists), and dozens of other sects.
Don't know about the slim, but Hubbard got 2 projects and one of them is the Church of Scientology. Here is exactly a sect, not seen it myself -was told by those who can believe without checking . While Hubbard may not his personal achievements, but rather the way it is, but the recapitulation of the events of the past and regressions including a very working technique and exercises. Work without reference to the structure and without any "contract" with the structure. And by the way, many of these programs and exercises I use for work (recapitulation) with themselves and with others.
I'm not going to lay out these practices-exercises( there are some comrades here plagiarists that stroke is a hell where primeniti))))And say that it was analyzephasethree))).
With all due respect to both... , Igorek, and you do not admit that I do not knowing or not having experienced , make hasty conclusions? By the way did you ask the question to them?
Suddenly they will answer you?))))and can respond, only you don't know?? Or don't tell ... Or give the knowledge that they , and you associate it with?<