On the distillate almost nothing works. And the information on it does not stay long. Is activated and deactivated almost simultaneously.Анатолий Т. wrote:At distilate.
And put put. But not for the treatment of tap water. Although these experiments were carried out. But there are reservations. But some manufacturers "juice" and carbonated beverages in Ukraine - such plants exist. Although their presence and use is not publicized.Анатолий Т. wrote:EHF emitters for wastewater treatment plants...
And don't believe. To prove to You something or to convince otherwise even not going.Анатолий Т. wrote:and I do not believe that the radiation at the resonant frequency "beat" the water molecules H2O.
Yes, if you are dealing with distilled water.Анатолий Т. wrote:Here, in one place, the bond will break and the other is broken will be restored.
It's a common phrase-pattern, such as "raising vibrations", "increasing the density" etc. Without understanding the deep essence of meaning and content phrases about "energy", "vibration" and "activated" it is better not to rush.Анатолий Т. wrote:activating the water, we energetically "raises"
There were plenty of them. Moreover, the right of defense, not armchair theorists. But such things one cannot write. Didn't want to be accused of pseudoscience. Although, for such measurements and experiments existed (and exists) a special laboratory at a great depth under ground, protected from any radiation. In her experiments were conducted and held only at night, depending on solar activity, do not go when the distillation train in the subway, trams, etc. It has one of the research institutes, which in the programme participated.Анатолий Т. wrote:was little known in this "Response" of academics per square meter.
Do not assume all idiots. Moreover, to engage in fantasies, not backed by inside knowledge of the case. When I have participated in this program, the meetings sometimes attacked academics and professors, even for the mistakes of the samples. Not to mention the fact that was criticized for not using one or another method of data analysis. And no I across the word said. Because with my data, fared the best, although I was the youngest.Анатолий Т. wrote:i.e. just the conditions of the experiments were not clean.
Schrödinger equation and schrödinger's paradox (the paradox of Schrodinger's cat) are two different things.Анатолий Т. wrote:there's a persistent rumor that ur. Schrödinger was sucked from the finger...
But! Chatted on General topics and that's enough. Will ask You to stop this topic discussion that does not apply or applies indirectly. I would not want to make people read what they interested. Probably someone may be subscribed to updates in this thread. And now, You write or I'm not on. Person receives an SMS or notification about the update. The man enters and immediately sees that went in vain. Let's not disappoint people and waste their time reading the discussion that they are not interested and obscure.<