Discussion of competition INTUITION
Re: Discussion of competition INTUITION
no, there is no fraud, but there is another answer why so ))At the moment, 29 of the 57 responses came from users with only 1 post on the forum..and I just want to give the main part of the checked in after the start of the experiment
Re: Discussion of competition INTUITION
By the way, the probability to win is not dependent on the number of participants. If a person is really psychic - quietly pass 1,2,3 stages and win )))
If playing a guessing game, relying on the case (thinking that the clairvoyant) - that is fully subject to the theorems of probability, the psychology of crowds and the laws of mass (fully controlled by a probability field).
That is, if a person is really a wizard - he is able to condense probability, increasing them to the unit, "compact probabilistic field." Which actually looks, and is a miracle in reality. So let's see - are there such... Or just controlled.
If playing a guessing game, relying on the case (thinking that the clairvoyant) - that is fully subject to the theorems of probability, the psychology of crowds and the laws of mass (fully controlled by a probability field).
That is, if a person is really a wizard - he is able to condense probability, increasing them to the unit, "compact probabilistic field." Which actually looks, and is a miracle in reality. So let's see - are there such... Or just controlled.
Re: Discussion of competition INTUITION
Positive half-wave can not exist without the negative ))) Negative after announcement of the results ))
That's the problem of expectations... That they do not come true more often than true
That's the problem of expectations... That they do not come true more often than true
-
- Разработчик
- Posts:2240
- Joined:Sat Apr 06, 2013 13:29
- Location:Москва
- Has thanked: 22 times
- Been thanked: 1124 times
Re: Discussion of competition INTUITION
Correct answers are undesirable. The main condition of operation of the mechanism of intuition – disable logical thinking, first came sensations, thoughts, images that emerged on a whim, the first impulse is usually the most correct, change the answers later under the influence of doubt, read reviews, study the statistics of the responses of the other parties to the wrong. The inclusion logic is well evident in the 6-th the task - preference in the answers given by the subjects, usually lying on the table... /tip/ not so obvious
The name of the contest “Intuition”, not “Clairvoyance”, the purpose of the contest is creation of conditions for the exercise of their own abilities, open in itself something new. Voiced the banal truth is important, not the winning but the taking part. The only expectation among observers and organizers – the number of stakeholders, the results have exceeded expectations - thank you to all participants! With regard to the expectations of the participants, expressed the hope that they are more connected with the process of going through jobs, thin listening to yourself and your feelings will not change with the publication of the replies, treat the contest as an interesting experiment, where reward is experience, not attempts to someone to prove something.
Participants are asked to properly arrange the answers in a spoiler and properly formulate responses - responses like "or clubs, or hearts" will be considered only the first option, or the answer will not be counted at all. If in doubt about the exact answer, write to, for example, "the red suit".
The name of the contest “Intuition”, not “Clairvoyance”, the purpose of the contest is creation of conditions for the exercise of their own abilities, open in itself something new. Voiced the banal truth is important, not the winning but the taking part. The only expectation among observers and organizers – the number of stakeholders, the results have exceeded expectations - thank you to all participants! With regard to the expectations of the participants, expressed the hope that they are more connected with the process of going through jobs, thin listening to yourself and your feelings will not change with the publication of the replies, treat the contest as an interesting experiment, where reward is experience, not attempts to someone to prove something.
Participants are asked to properly arrange the answers in a spoiler and properly formulate responses - responses like "or clubs, or hearts" will be considered only the first option, or the answer will not be counted at all. If in doubt about the exact answer, write to, for example, "the red suit".
-
- Posts:57
- Joined:Tue Apr 01, 2014 0:29
- Has thanked: 7 times
- Been thanked: 21 times
Re: Discussion of competition INTUITION
Cheers, managed to answer) Apparently the organizers have set additional information protection on the job) Information is obtained via a dream. Only on the third night began to come the answers to the job...before it activated BRM Bridge on "accurate responses to the tasks of the competition intuition" and put under the pillow. As can't wait to see the answers!
Re: Discussion of competition INTUITION
you can, for example, to calculate *re-participants in the contest Intuition))))Рэмис wrote:Colleagues, and maybe even some competition will held, and it is boring as it became....
Re: Discussion of competition INTUITION
The first thing that came to mind Such small, little cactuses. I was recently in a floral inspired looks.Милая wrote:I Watched the participants ' answers, wondering all ))) But that's only to hide the cactus for the paper would be cruel on the part of the organizers, no?
Re: Discussion of competition INTUITION
rainbow I once more felt here and there it is - the cactus to touch. And suddenly a cactus? In the head suddenly came that the responses can be tracked associative array of participants, well, the logic is also felt. You were in flower and cactus You fell for the soul. And I'm still in "architecture of GEIP" toil, can not understand, just stuck on the egg, as one, on the whole, here and parked it where possible.
-
- Разработчик
- Posts:2240
- Joined:Sat Apr 06, 2013 13:29
- Location:Москва
- Has thanked: 22 times
- Been thanked: 1124 times
Re: Discussion of competition INTUITION
Better to deal with 1 than not deal with anything Will handle 1, handle 2. With numbers important to start directed associative stream reconstructed from vdolblennye in school definitions and perceptions of numbers. Important and culturally conditioned perception. Most importantly, get a feel for how the number is connected with a living reality, including physical and mental reality. Is it a coincidence that having numbers 1-9 we have 9 major functional divisions of the brain?Милая wrote:I with numbers in "architecture of GEIP" toil, can not understand, just stuck on the egg, as one, on the whole, here and parked it where possible.
Re: Discussion of competition INTUITION
well, dear magicians, fortune-tellers, alchemists and wizards!....
judging from the posted responses, the Ability to Hear your Intuition ... leaves much to be desired....
Clairvoyance and Snezana as well ...
us all the tools and knowledge given...
who would use...
I thank the administration of the site and to the masterminds of the contest!and to all participants!
for the observations))))
judging from the posted responses, the Ability to Hear your Intuition ... leaves much to be desired....
Clairvoyance and Snezana as well ...
us all the tools and knowledge given...
who would use...
for the observations))))
-
- Posts:50
- Joined:Wed Sep 27, 2017 17:37
- Has thanked: 6 times
- Been thanked: 12 times
Re: Discussion of competition INTUITION
I have a whole lot simpler and easier. I've registered on the forum mindmachine.ru Written too long ago, a few posts. But as tried, could not log in under that username. Maybe my account has long been deleted, or maybe just I forgot their credentials. To think, a few years ago.Лон wrote:At the moment, 29 of the 57 responses came from users with only 1 post on the forum..and I just want to give the main part of the checked in after the start of the experiment
-
- Posts:80
- Joined:Sat Jun 24, 2017 14:20
- Has thanked: 7 times
- Been thanked: 10 times
Re: Discussion of competition INTUITION
Логия wrote:well, dear magicians, fortune-tellers, alchemists and wizards!....
-
- Разработчик
- Posts:2240
- Joined:Sat Apr 06, 2013 13:29
- Location:Москва
- Has thanked: 22 times
- Been thanked: 1124 times
Re: Discussion of competition INTUITION
Began the 2nd stage of the competition!
- Ростислав
- Posts:1253
- Joined:Tue Sep 16, 2008 16:37
- Location:Дальше только земля Франса Иосифа
- Has thanked: 35 times
- Been thanked: 28 times
- Contact:
Re: Discussion of competition INTUITION
where the results of the first?
-
- Разработчик
- Posts:2240
- Joined:Sat Apr 06, 2013 13:29
- Location:Москва
- Has thanked: 22 times
- Been thanked: 1124 times
Re: Discussion of competition INTUITION
The theme of the contest.
<Андрей Кабанков wrote:Results of the 1st stage.
Passing score stage 1 - 5 points.
All participants scored 5 points and above are invited to participate in the 2nd stage of the competition!
10 points
Aastha (+ extra prize for the precise determination of the suit and the value of the card)
Andras
Igors
9 points
Nanomed
8 points
Svetlana
Anastasia Valeryevna
7 points
Sirmans
Anna SPb
Didi
The magician
6 points:
Kona
LON
Radanov
Biliary Wolves
Alena Makhneva
Zukhra
Askar Zhumakanov
Diya
Marillac
Lady Bug
Kristinalert
Vlad
Oleracea
Donna Lily
Sol
5 points scored the following participants:
.at.
Dmitry Nikitin
Ales.E
Petros
Oleksandr
Dmitry And
Fadiman
Rainbow
Paveli
Natalushka
Well
Imari
Wise
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
4 points
Stepford
Anastasiya Lagunova
Maxim Maraev
Witch
Olga Ryabikova
Ekaterina Terekhova
Fallacies
Gail
3 points
Not knowing
EVG
Agent Smith
Meme
Sea
Andrew VN
REMIS
Wolverine
Rostislav
Sergey Ivlev
Alevtina
Lily Old
Ani Avon
Yuk
Sweetheart
Guess
Alexei
2 points
Tatyana Zorina
April
Pilgrim
Elenka
Diso
Andreyko
Olga K
Elina
Vladimir Mikhaylenko
Namanama
Merkaba
Iringa
Евген412
1 point
Chloe
Timur T
Eugene B.
Stein
Nataraaja
Vlad N
Tanak
Elena
EPHRAIM
Sangova Olesya
0 points
Feng
Responses of two participants that were made after the announcement of the first phase of responses were not considered.
- Ростислав
- Posts:1253
- Joined:Tue Sep 16, 2008 16:37
- Location:Дальше только земля Франса Иосифа
- Has thanked: 35 times
- Been thanked: 28 times
- Contact:
Re: Discussion of competition INTUITION
to be honest passing grade 5 is not correct , job 6
three I guessed - but was not (((
three I guessed - but was not (((
Re: Discussion of competition INTUITION
One point is not enough, well, nothing, for the first time for me, 4 points is also good! Hopefully, this competition will not last!
-
- Разработчик
- Posts:2240
- Joined:Sat Apr 06, 2013 13:29
- Location:Москва
- Has thanked: 22 times
- Been thanked: 1124 times
Re: Discussion of competition INTUITION
If to compare the participants ' answers to mathematical probability, we get:Логия wrote:well, dear magicians, fortune-tellers, alchemists and wizards!....
judging from the posted responses, the Ability to Hear your Intuition ... leaves much to be desired....
Clairvoyance and Snezana as well ...
4 correct answer - 11,6% (in 7 times above the average, and 6.4 times higher than the maximum probability of blind guessing).по. wrote:Average probability of blind guessing FOUR answers: 1.65%
Maximum likelihood: 1.8%
3 correct answer and 41.8% (in 10 times above average, and 5.5 times higher than the maximum probability of blind guessing).по. wrote:The average probability of guessing THREE: 4.2%
The maximum probability of guessing THREE: 7.5%
Apparently, the passing score depends on the capabilities of your opponents in the competition, and as you can see from the statistics above, they are high enough.Ростислав wrote:honestly pass the ball 5 is not correct , job 6
Re: Discussion of competition INTUITION
sorry, we observe with interest the competition and also crunched the numbers. Guess the number of threes obtained 19 people (22.6%). Predict the number of fours - 7 persons (8.3%). Your numbers don't really add up. But it doesn't matter. Overall, some anomaly with the calculations in this thread observed, but that's because Mr .at. thought of probability is not entirely correct - composite likelihood is considered difficult and error it is forgivable. Correct to consider separately the probability for each question, here's what happened:
incidentally, we wrote the answers quite by accident and as you can see, were as much as 6 points. Too early for wishful thinking, anomalies while there was a slight, on the first question because of the specificity of lighting on the third issue due to the fact that the average map is the one referred to most often. On the fourth and fifth question, which was given the highest points of the anomalies are not detected. Also, it is not found and the second where the lighting is not affected.
incidentally, we wrote the answers quite by accident and as you can see, were as much as 6 points. Too early for wishful thinking, anomalies while there was a slight, on the first question because of the specificity of lighting on the third issue due to the fact that the average map is the one referred to most often. On the fourth and fifth question, which was given the highest points of the anomalies are not detected. Also, it is not found and the second where the lighting is not affected.
Last edited by сол on Sun Oct 01, 2017 22:44, edited 1 time in total.