Consequently, some are doing what is necessary. This is good news.ЕвгенийР wrote:most mostly nonsense
Most, but not all.ЕвгенийР wrote:the Majority of "astrologers", as most "homeopaths" or representatives of other professions are always on one track
It makes sense to do this, and it turns out that with two hands for "scientific" and what is it - it doesn't matter. You're a thinking person, you would have to face to have clear definitions of those moments. At least for myself. Or that in the dialogue the confusion arose.ЕвгенийР wrote:scientific Criteria? Not thought about it yet.
However, astrology has stood the test of time, and it was engaged and continue to engage people whose intellectual capacity is not inferior you and I together))) Technically Yes, as if guessing. But guesses are based on statistical data on similar foundations are all natural Sciences. And the fact that no one has yet bothered to formulate a scientific-sounding harness all this wealth - so it does not bother anyone.ЕвгенийР wrote:astrology by definition does not have the property of repeatability.
A worthy goal! I wish You the most to implement it and to teach all who are willing to accept your methods. Only present them separately from astrology and runes, and who knows what else...ЕвгенийР wrote:I have another task - to find and eliminate the negative.
Tomorrow at work))) For SIM otklanivayus!