Magic Attention

[вотан]

at.the implementation of Atma.is you stomach suggested...of the neural network.or did your practices was preceded by a theoretical study...read borrowed parts later tested and partially implemented.

[Хорошо]

Well identified program of "imitation", which is protected. But I did not asked to show his own )) Is not, so the program is protected.

Atma is a tree of infinite probabilities. Man is a concrete implementation of a specific probability. Implemented probability - implemented Atma, the world was created, manifested. The world is a new combination that was not there before.

nope, revealed the program a "false interpretation" of defending your ego
can't display "private", because when I searched for "own" - I never found it, and even a sense only "I am" eventually became not so private, and now all I can say is something like "happenings", but it's not my own of course

all that is said about Atma is false or a very, very simplistically, people spend life to ever touch

[.по.]

Wotan, of course, the world, or rather his description of going from the known bricks - that gives the neural network. What bricks are in stock - out of that he built.

But the rules of building a world - it gives the stomach. It's the same when you get unknown information from the inside, which contradicts your beliefs. And then you discover - it is known many people say, you just never noticed... That is, the neural network detects unknown to her rules, which are confirmed by the outside world and it is nothing left to do but to rebuild itself.

The neural network and the intuition adjust to each other, it turns out the creation of new exclusive combination. Bricks+rules = created subjective world. But just copying someone else is pulling other people's bricks without understanding how to put them into a new combination. This building houses template, copying. You must have a person to be your rules? Its essence? After all, if it is not - then there's no soul coming out?

[.по.]

because when I searched for "own" - I never found it

it's a shame, but honestly ))

[Хорошо]

such a shame for someone, but he does not know what is behind this and she can't campaign

[.по.]

well, now I'm the enemy, you have to drop me, zatrollit to ridicule ))) For spirituality.

But if a little more attention to what is happening inside you... And to be very honest with ourselves...

[Хорошо]

release this program, which is now protected and you will see that inside me is either all or nothing - it depends on where look

[вотан]

I understand .at.from the foregoing, that your practice psychosomatic is also influenced by the same...Jung..Freud and others of that ilk.you are only a supporter or follower of their model of the universe whose name is man.I already stipulated that mentally writing..able to build understanding and perception of the world

[.по.]

Yes, it's all based on copying. What was interesting (and at a subconscious level) that people have studied - and from the building. Decisive are the internal rules... And the result is a unique combination, a unique model. Which is not necessary to copy others because someone out there said something. And it is necessary to integrate already gained over 15 billion years of experience, to improve it and build from it new. That is to create. Do not copy.

As to give the example of Freud, Jung, videos of different kinds, dozens of other similarities... for one purpose Only - example of analogy is the same in other subjective and formed worlds.

[вотан]

this is worse than copying.it predlozhennny us version of the universe.for which a person grabs..like a dog over a bone.and why not create something really new....not having analogues.man alive...the world is too.why not grow a living house.not pribegaya before to destructive activities.))))

[.по.]

Where do you see destruction... I wrote about the synthesis, the integration of the old and creation of new combinations Of light (mind-only) and its forms. If another neural network is not very well understood, and went automatic response... That's her free will - she is free to do anything. I could neither prevent nor change. It is a strange world that decided to attack (wanting to destroy), simply because they do not like something (inability to describe their own) - it's his decision.

[вотан]

in the works is defining freedom.from everything and all.otherwise, is fitting of the model to itself.why not use zero mental level.or rather a building site without a variety of mental clutter

[.по.]

I agree, but show me the lack of freedom on the sample (quote, phrase, comprehension, opinion), and it is not very clear what they mean.

[Хорошо]

here and so the ego builds himself an alibi for the mind, inventing and attributing to others what was not even close
all of this speaks only about you

[.по.]

all about me, but about me )) Attention outwards... Just asked you to describe your world started...

[Хорошо]

in the works is defining freedom.from everything and all.otherwise, is fitting of the model to itself.

this is the last time is the fundamental vector. It looks like the opposite of "power" and the desire "to control"

[вотан]

at.with women, the girls will not work.how did you not integrate.

[.по.]

because "Baba" is the form already built house. To dismantle the house brick by brick and build any other. New.

But of houses new house is not to build just... First need you to analyze (parse), then synthesis (put in new). At the stage of copying foreign models - analysis is strictly required. An opinion about someone else's model, its analysis brick by brick in an attempt to understand how they evolved... the Result - understanding of the General rules (Foundation, walls, roof), and at the same time to make their own rules (design, concrete house shape, size, finish)

[вотан]

any rules pour in from"accommodate"are already a kind of restriction of freedom.the house is built over the rules...no matter how good I was.ALIVE is not.

[.по.]

you are completely write about what I do. Copying and imitation is not necessary ))) you Need to hear yourself. Do not post other people's diagrams, pictures, statements as indicating "look right." And post only as a confirmation of their own understanding, "look, he got it! Amazing, so I am not stuck"

As for bricks... they are both words, and any description of something, e.g. "the color red". You can tell the specific facts of the objective world where we live. Without Kirpichov nothing to build.

[вотан]

creativity...it's an unusual approach.and not the standard thinking.

[.по.]

agree, wrote about the same ))) I am Glad that the topic prevails consensus

[.по.]

[youtube][/youtube]

these balls... the Worlds... I don't know what to do with the universe - maybe just collects in a pile, and collects, they can then born again, may live individually in the different objective layers can create their own universes with their own rules... whatever it was - they matter ))

[вотан]

why a man as vigorous biosystem with growing anything and everything not able to grow the house?using the algorithms of the brain to create components of the space bread...milk.not using time-consuming intermediate processes?

[вотан]

the the brick.it's clay..water....fire.why implementation of the much time-consuming?why hour and still not come up with a different move water...soil and all the rest?