Lancelot
Interesting aunt.
Gathered everything together, hinted at some kind of experiment, dragged cancer, leukemia and infertility and the end of the age-old question - "how long?"...
In fact, used specific professional language, generally Amateur hypnotically. All of these discursive bundles with cancer, leukemia and infertility is completely unfounded and just lined up in a row with the scientific terms in which the majority of listeners (the audience) did not understand (and I don't want got enough on my plate), so take everything on faith. Yes, they even flattered - to say, we all were taught in school genetics - have, then, to realize, damn...
But the logic of these interventions is simple: "ate the frog, became a frog, ate a cucumber was a cucumber, etc." which I personally strongly doubt, even if you eat it raw, and after heat treatment, and in General...
One thing I agree with it - strict control of GMOs, because the potential is possible
specifically to do really anything, but not these mythical genes that go into germ cells, and, for example, the production of "elementary" a "cumulative poison"
*that may have the same teratogenic properties and safely withstand the heat treatment. But while it requires a massive financial cost (which can only be allocated at the state level) - some "genetic"
weapon of mass destruction. Corporations, by themselves, will not do - the money is there to count.
In my opinion, the purpose of these presentations and publications is a distraction of public opinion from the real problems and dangers associated with GMOs.
Using GMOs to feed the entire population of the planet, and not only the notorious "Golden billion", so the tactics chosen tricky: trample public opinion, fearing such publications, GM is very good (it will be easier to regulate population growth) and scientists will be able to clearly demonstrate the absurdity of such publications - even better (on the background of mass implementation and of the mess that inevitably will come, you have to introduce to military development (and, again, to regulate population growth under the guise of humanitarian aid).
* a cumulative poison, a poison that can accumulate in the body and begins to have a noticeable effect after exceeding a certain threshold. This poison can be present in the product in trace concentrations (detectable only with the use of very expensive chemical analyses, plus need to know what to look for), but due to the regular use of concentration of this poison in the body will gradually increase until it reaches a certain effective threshold. Thus, while pathologists describe the symptoms, this information will be compiled, while you will find a chemical substance that is appropriate for the symptoms, while organized mass screening - is already very, very late. In the place of our government (damn, God forbid) I would have sent a humanitarian mission to Africa (and other places) specially trained doctors, to know in advance - what will have to face in the near future...<