Forum

There is an urgent need fotocity.
Guys, there are among You(us) fototeca, help tips, reviews, personal recommendations, answers...

Flipped through another book by P. Shelly Photochemie. It says on photofocus and that in the process of potocani no information should get into consciousness, only a subconscious.
1. Accordingly, the question arose: does this mean that I shouldn't catch any verbal units deliberately, i.e. I need just a picture and if the words fall in consciousness, so I fotocity not correct.

2. And the second question: photofocus – how it is achieved. I understand this -- take a stereo image, capturing a three-dimensional image (or at the initial stage to stupor playing stereometric) and without changing the focus start fotocity i.e. flipping the pages, spending at every turn for one second.

3. And the third question: how would you individually describe the nature obtained by potocani image of the back cover of the book. I have several types (character image). In one of them, the paper becomes whiter, and the letters are blacker and the picture starts to move, but no phantom page is no... it's photofocus? It, as I understand it we have to catch up on each page/double page of the book.

4. And the fourth question: how much can cram into the subconscious in one day... like two books a night is this normal?

5. And fifth questions: as I understand it, if there is no clear purpose of potocani (i.e., there is no problem to find some answer), the activation occurs just in some kind of semi-conscious speed-reading-search, postclosure. How long does the received passive information (pictures of pages) in the subconscious (as far as I know -- all my life) and how it is retrieved into the conscious mind, get active knowledge? Ie how and when to get it out through a long period of time after photobacteria books (e.g. a year)? Extracted whether the theoretical knowledge from the unconscious to consciousness at the practical problems (of this knowledge), for example, again, a year after photobacteria books?

Going policital books on programming and networking.<

ЗОМБИ wrote:I understand this -- take a stereo image

I too understand
this is called a stereogram (for search)

me easy this. very easy.
http://log-in.ru/illusions/2478/

Yes, it was an example, if hto is not f the subject.
Google stereograms. - not tons, but enough.

and most importantly the founding fathers are silent

here, Vladimir Nikonov I would have answered that whether or Andrei Patrushev

they are the shizzle photographers

I understand it is not less important when potocani also to keep the focus just above the top of the head in the analogy in the book (Shelly) is for example a conical wizards hat (like she was used to achieve a particular state) and the concentration produced at the tip (top) of the cap, an imaginary or real. And interestingly (in the book this analogy is not) but this place is very reminiscent of the localization of the chakras is the Sahasrara. And already if to continue the analytical chain would not in fact reading books and the paging information of the energy-informational field of the earth, and information from the book only by the fact that you're focusing on this work. Not for nothing did Shelley says that you first need to learn who wrote what book, the task of reading put, etc. etc.

I dream will learn fotocity. Read all books by Shelly, watched instructional videos, but to practices hands never came. I want to also add that in Germany there are certified teachers of this technique.

ЗОМБИ wrote:1. Accordingly, the question arose: does this mean that I shouldn't catch any verbal units deliberately, i.e. I need just a picture and if the words fall in consciousness, so I fotocity not correct.

No, of course - even entire paragraphs. Importantly, the intention, good physical relaxation and concentration.

ЗОМБИ wrote:2. And the second question: photofocus – how it is achieved. I understand this -- take a stereo image, capturing a three-dimensional image (or at the initial stage to stupor playing stereometric) and without changing the focus start fotocity i.e. flipping the pages, spending at every turn for one second.

Yes, something like that, but photofocus is only an artificial technique to maintain the required concentration and removal of cockroaches, so there is no need for him to bother too much - it should be rather easy, not to be tired and moderately difficult, not to be distracted...

ЗОМБИ wrote:3. And the third question: how would you individually describe the nature obtained by potocani image of the back cover of the book. I have several types (character image). In one of them, the paper becomes whiter, and the letters are blacker and the picture starts to move, but no phantom page is no... it's photofocus? It, as I understand it we have to catch up on each page/double page of the book.

See the paragraph above.

ЗОМБИ wrote:4. And the fourth question: how much can cram into the subconscious in one day... like two books a night is this normal?

It's hard to say... I think so, - on a particular topic may be a few books (the more the better ) download... But differently, probably, there are individual limitations...

ЗОМБИ wrote:5. And fifth questions: as I understand it, if there is no clear purpose of potocani (i.e., there is no problem to find some answer), the activation occurs just in some kind of semi-conscious speed-reading-search, postclosure. How long does the received passive information (pictures of pages) in the subconscious (as far as I know -- all my life) and how it is retrieved into the conscious mind, get active knowledge? I.e. how and when to get it out through a long period of time after photobacteria books (e.g. a year)? Extracted whether the theoretical knowledge from the unconscious to consciousness at the practical problems (of this knowledge), for example, again, a year after photobacteria books?

Activation occurs spontaneously when information is needed for something. But still, the activation to do (though postpromotion) but in the near future to pave the path for subsequent spontaneous activation, which can occur even after ten years....<

Энди wrote:And already if to continue the analytical chain would not in fact reading books and the paging information of the energy-informational field of the earth, and information from the book only by the fact that you're focusing on this work.

I suspect not...

Энди wrote:I have a dream learn fotocity. Read all books by Shelly, watched instructional videos, but to practices hands never came. I want to also add that in Germany there are certified teachers of this technique.

There's no training - you just have to do that...

ЗОМБИ wrote:and most importantly the founding fathers are silent
here, Vladimir Nikonov I would have answered that whether or Andrei Patrushev
they are the shizzle photographers

You, as always, run ahead of a paracart... Just wrote, and here you have let's answer...
Yes, I read now and then - I like it, but Volodya, it seems, disappointed... At least, in one of his newsletters said very skeptical about this method...

Энди wrote:I understand it is not less important when potocani also to keep the focus just above the top of the head in the analogy in the book (Shelly) is for example a conical wizards hat (like she was used to achieve a particular state) and the concentration produced at the tip (top) of the cap, an imaginary or real. And interestingly (in the book this analogy is not) but this place is very reminiscent of the localization of the chakras is the Sahasrara. And already if to continue the analytical chain would not in fact reading books and the paging information of the energy-informational field of the earth, and information from the book only by the fact that you're focusing on this work. Not for nothing did Shelley says that you first need to learn who wrote what book, the task of reading put, etc. etc.

Pselli analogy is... technique of Mandarin, if you watched the video -- Mandarin (by bourgeois sounds)
I even think not to smear if this place anything pungent, like balm asterisk.

by the way, there is such a technique, the Clergy in one step, say (Andrey Lapin in one of his video lectures, by the way, awesome funny lectures) Scientologists withdrew it from its texts because of its terrible effectiveness... it is necessary to look at everything (and always) due to the eye from somewhere just above the nape of the neck... it isn't that photofocus (it is necessary to clarify, but I can not find again where I saw specifically)

Андрей Патрушев wrote:You, as always, run ahead of a paracart... Just wrote, and here you have let's answer...

it was a provocation

in General it is clear: the most important thing right conentrate and relaxed, but at first you think crutches out like this of the techniques and tricks needed. only perfect practice makes perfect.

thanks for the replies!

Yes, one very important detail - the game approach. If You're dead serious, trying to concentrate, then automatically displays the voltage that "score all channels". Therefore, photochemie need to be adjusted, as a game.

Andrei Patrushev But you have abormot to potocani to obtain the SKILL described in the book, and naborot for recovering text photoprofiling no. Will he ever?

Andrei Patrushev That's invented on the fly as you can try fotocity take MM Navigator in it in synchrostart startup disk Ultramesh (Patrushev) and parallel looped (for the duration of the sound Ultramega) Sahasrara disk solar wind. Well and accordingly in glasses with holes to provocate a couple of books. And here would be the next day to listen to naborot for the restoration read.

Энди wrote:Andrei Patrushev But you have abormot to potocani to obtain the SKILL described in the book, and naborot for recovering text photoprofiling no. Will he ever?

Yes, and pretty soon...

Энди wrote:Andrei Patrushev That's invented on the fly as you can try fotocity take MM Navigator in it in synchrostart startup disk Ultramesh (Patrushev) and parallel looped (for the duration of the sound Ultramega) Sahasrara disk solar wind. Well and accordingly in glasses with holes to provocate a couple of books. And here would be the next day to listen to naborot for the restoration read.

The brain is a delicate thing... Sometimes too good is bad... No need, IMHO, is visual analyzer extra signals to score...
I would be confined to Concentration from the Theta Meditation.

Энди wrote:Andrei Patrushev But you have abormot to potocani to obtain the SKILL described in the book

Kintos a reference please

Андрей Патрушев wrote:

Энди wrote:And already if to continue the analytical chain would not in fact reading books and the paging information of the energy-informational field of the earth, and information from the book only by the fact that you're focusing on this work.

I suspect not...

I know quite a few reliable cases, when people have this swap works since childhood and for some time (often dies when switching into manhood). I suspect that it is more efficient to activate, without the prosthesis, as always, the question in a good way to rewrite the algorithms of perception on top of the already natapong trails, causing the injury and, on the contrary, by bringing some order in "the house". Overall this is about as in the case described by Andrew regarding the omniscience of languages. But neatness is necessary in 10 times more, and some "swing" not understand that and final truth issue.

PS One of our friend, in school and student age, good understanding in technical disciplines, nevertheless knew the answers to task not only by decisions, but also directly. Ie, I could just write the correct answer. One day she arranged for such an emergency in the Soviet time - got on a minute before flow of control in the classroom(a teacher having added options from the "envelope" left in the toilet a minute before the bell) and has written for all versions all the answers that was technically not possible. She needs to know in advance the tasks could not, and time to decide she didn't have well then thunder and lightning and all that
So what happens differently.

recently decided to provocate (soon to Procuratorate in a review style, i.e. without stereo and Mandarin) for a hundred pages forward in the book on the computer.networks... is still read in the usual... in short, on the trail.evening reading these pages has noticed that the head is constantly QUICK construction of the image, and because the concept is somewhat technical, these images are not like pictures, but as a written UNDERSTANDING, not memorization, for further thought... the read speed naturally increased.

Воффка wrote:QUINTA a reference please

I do not remember where he was rocked, but it coincides with what I have
http://www.mu5ic.ru/meditation/direct_learning.mp3

Андрей Патрушев wrote:the Brain is a delicate thing... Sometimes too good is bad... No need, IMHO, is visual analyzer extra signals to score...
I would be confined to Concentration from the Theta Meditation.

Well, in the case of telemedical on the concentration seems to be a few bugs (though I understand that such seriousness does not correspond to the game state when potocani):
1. From the state of concentration will constantly beat out by turning pages
2. And given the fact that it is necessary kontsentrirovanija at two objects (a book and a tangerine on top) isn't it better still to use the DECONCENTRATION?

And another question on the practice - as all the same maximum efficiently get rid of the inner voice (it interferes with normal speed reading) which reads the text as if the consciousness still clings to the word?

Энди wrote:Well, in the case of telemedical on the concentration seems to be a few bugs (though I understand that such seriousness does not correspond to the game state when potocani):
1. From the state of concentration will constantly beat out by turning pages
2. And given the fact that it is necessary kontsentrirovanija at two objects (a book and a tangerine on top) isn't it better still to use the DECONCENTRATION?

1. Not a fact... And even if, then so what?
2. Mandarin concentrate is not necessary - set and forget (for the technique). Initiate deconcentration deconcentration and not concentration. Or are You always doing the opposite???

And another question on the practice - as all the same maximum efficiently get rid of the inner voice (it interferes with normal speed reading) which reads the text as if the consciousness still clings to the word?

And like soft You for what???

Андрей Патрушев wrote:And like soft You for what???

Александр Родионович Бородач wrote:Guys I don't know!!!

You can have the details about the rechetativa?