At first glance, all right. This paragraph from the article.Андрей Патрушев wrote:Interesting article: https://www.sravni.ru/text/2017/5/7/ted ... ost-kopit/
Suppose that that visceral difference makes you subtly dissociate the future from the present every time he speaks. If so, and it makes the future feel more distant and more different from the present, a man will be harder to make savings. If, on the other hand, you speak a language having no future tense, you say the same about the present and about the future. If that subtly nudges you to feel about them identically, it will be easier to make savings.
After all, when built and executed desire including in-programming, it is done in real time. All the way!
But Logica protests. If your language indicates the present time and there is no future time, why do you accumulate? There are resources, live the present, enjoy it, enjoy life, spend. Why should we accumulate, if there is no future?
Something here not so! Someone maps wince. You need to think!