.....................................
Sincerely, uncle Jack.
A real technique and really works (tested by myself). The only BUT not all of what is now the Internet is positioned under this method, works. For example, recently came is spam about studying English by this method. The site was the demo, which clearly indicated that the developers of the program do not understand neither the essence of the method or features of visual perception.Евгений wrote:What are your opinions on frame 25 in the study in.language??? The opinion is not idle. Because much has been written about photomemory, speed reading and other techniques based on similar principles(working with the subconscious) really want to hear informed opinions, but just..."quackery..." or "a very cool method..."![]()
Hello, Eugene!Евгений wrote:To Andrei Patrushev
Thank you Andrew for the response and advice!
I'm the type that last year wrote about the study of language and large amounts of information...with mind machines and your CDs!![]()
Now, as vysheukazannoe, expanding approaches and strongly want to finish this issue again in a short time.
In this regard, the question arose about the 25 fps I was reading up earlier about the effect of the 25th frame, but very "much water poured" around this phenomenon. And that there is only one firm that manufactures THESE DRIVES with stored in a special way and special technique - some features of the method. It is not without truth, the ways and methods but here is how to know which ones are real (those that..more) and which are false. I have two disk "Quick teacher" and that's the one that was advertised through the Internet. And where is the truth??? What products and where best to buy(if there is a link to an OPTION)and what to expect from this? Maybe something else will advise, in my difficult task in the spring will go again over the hill-take the exams in the second round! And this time even less, and the volume is the same and a bit more added!
Then look at the beginning and end of the pageAnd about the program-it can be, if I understand correctly Andrew, 25 fps
One simple detail - the following text appears on the same place as the previous one and "overwrites" the previous head information.Сергей Михайлов wrote:Patrushev Question is about 25K
I wonder what netherdale developers techniques?
I also did a program based on the idea 25K. So it is still visible. As far as I know, this effect is only possible in the movies.
or am I wrong?
In a conventional film similarly all seen. Now apply mosaic (desperanto) presentation (one frame contains only a small part of information).Сергей Михайлов wrote:cinema has no horizontal scan.
In television, a single frame is almost like another. If scenes are very different from each other, it will be ruffle.
I thought that the fact that the eye does not see. So it was in the original.
But with this "and the subconscious assimilation of information" does not agree. Otherwise ordinary banner advertising on roads can be considered to be 25K.
It is not humane...Сергей Михайлов wrote:At the expense of the dominant, I agree completely.
People with pre dominant can see that even where it is not. For example, the "deeply religious" many of the actions will see the finger of God. A supporter of a "Judeo - Masonic conspiracy" will see signs of a conspiracy even in the form of pavers.
This, by the way, sleduet that the spread of messages suggestive means to one person will not be applicable for another.
Before selling 25K need to conduct psychological examination of sufferers.
What you, Andrew, think about this?
Ahh...Сергей Михайлов wrote:>It is not humane...
please rasshifruyte your message
---
I meant that different groups of "predominancy" we need to produce different products. And in order to determine which product you need konrketno person it should be evaluated for "cockroaches in the head".