or cleaning the air ,here such for example http://www.boneco.ru/catalog/aos-2055d.html
the principle of operation can be viewed here
device here
here
it is a marketing ploy - bipolar ionizers work on the principle of corona discharge and have the output the same ozone and why do we need the positive ions produced by these ionizers?they claim the alleged balance? not to insult the people making them ,money has spoiled the worldМирта wrote:About ozone - look for models constructed on the bipolar principle.
-Tuck...and experiences do not share?+ангел wrote:hi ,before purchasing the Ionizer, be sure to smell if there's output it Ozone http://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/O3 ,the vast majority
all produced at the output of the ionizer is ozone and it is not permissible ,the topic of air ionization was studied very seriously at one time ,gathered some of ionizers tested several commercially available[a good collection of factory instruments], including super plus which probably generiruet the largest amount of Ozone,of all tested devices, only one passed the test for the absence of the ozone- "Ryazan 101" but unfortunately it was produced in the USSR![]()
![]()
looks like here http://aukro.ua/item1286665072-ionizato ... n-101.html
From the characteristics of the ionizer+ангел wrote:is not a theory of Logic seems to you that it is not, but the ozone it on out there anyway even if you do not feel strong, he felt at certain threshold concentrations ,and it is mixed with the common mass of air and you can't feel it
![]()
![]()
Code: Select all
ozone Concentration not more than 0.01 mg / cubic m (the ratio of MPC – 0,1 mg / cu m)The content of positive ions in the indoor air with working equipment must meet approved standards: SanPiN 2.2.2.542-96 And SanPiN 2.2.2.542-96 Appendix 6 (mandatory), SanPiN 2.2.4.1294-03.+ангел wrote:it is a marketing ploy - bipolar ionizers work on the principle of corona discharge and have the output the same ozone and why do we need the positive ions produced by these ionizers?they claim the alleged balance? not to insult the people making them ,money has spoiled the worldМирта wrote:About ozone - look for models constructed on the bipolar principle.
I have setup the ionizer took a few hours ,will manufacturers to do that, I think not![]()
![]()
Oh I'm naive. Immediately seduced... Again these damn producers, Loja shod...+ангел wrote:Logik on the fence too it is written that X unfortunately on this planet lie often passes for the truth
From my experience, I note ( had to use 2 unipolar and 2 bipolar ionizer ) - the bipolar output, even if you bury them in the nose, ozone is not felt, but as I remember it is a comfortable sign of a gas concentration not higher than MPC. In addition no dirty edges on the walls.Логик wrote:Oh I'm naive. Immediately seduced... Again these damn producers, Loja shod...+ангел wrote:Logik on the fence too it is written that X unfortunately on this planet lie often passes for the truth
The threshold of odor perception for ozone (as a shampoo) is of 0.015-0.2 mg/m3 and with an ozone concentration of about 0.5 mg/m3 and above in the air there is an unpleasant pungent smell.
So if the smell of ozone is not felt, it speaks of very low ozone concentrations or the lack of it. The same is said passport data.
And your comment about the fence in this case is not appropriate.
Strange question really, when you consider that the cost of such devices is on the order of magnitude ( 10 times ) higher than the cost of the ionizer. Though I must pay tribute to the angel, there is such a service as the call of the master Adjuster of the ionizer, for painstaking configuration of the ionizer due to the ratio of the output ions, in accordance with the parameters of the apparatus ( the ionizer ) and the environment in which it operates.+ангел wrote: ...and the device you have that measures the concentration of air ions and Ozone concentrations ? it would be interesting to see his testimony
Thank you,+the angelbut from practical experience chenit there? Your ?+ангел wrote:(-Tuck...and experiences do not share?) Swami've found the magazine article on page 36 ,it is possible to download
http://narod.ru/disk/1694037001/ra0005.pdf.html
sorry about ionizers more sensible across nothing
Maybe open?+ангел wrote:Swami from experience - a long infusion of these devices (selection of the frequency generator) and the sharpening of the needle for the absence of corona discharge , but I failed altogether to get rid of a corona discharge it can be clearly seen in the dark so topic closed themselves
