Okay, but only on the good parts of the idea.Андрей Кабанков wrote:it's better then the rest because it is interesting.
About the bad, either in a personal or...., leave without announcement.
Last year, I'm here on the forum, a little sneer at the players in the Forex market.
But I have them and there are.
In the end, tired to convince of the stupidity of the idea, and decided to investigate.
As it so happened that I had a spare SIM card on "that guy".
Therefore, registered on Alpari and yourself and "that guy".
Opened two Demo accounts (again on both).
That would not melochitsa, the amounts in the accounts established for a hundred million bucks.
Because lazy to deal with all sorts of Stop-loss and other things.
And don't sit in the evenings to close open bets.
Let them stand open till the cows come home. The account balance is still huge and covers any risks.
Sat was working, jumped from account to account. Did think the same way. Here and there. December of last year. The Euro/dollar. The market stubbornly crept up and a decent pace. Then abruptly played.
In the end.
The "that guy" - a magnificent performance and profit, I sadly hung like fifteen open bets, every day, giving more and more minus. 50-60 thousand each.
But did everything seems the same.
On both accounts.
Thus, the idea of using "that guy" in the game on your money, in essence, is good.
Confirmed and in other situations for different people.
The conclusion is the same.
"INTERNAL auditor" LIMITING the GROWTH of EACH OF US IN MATERIAL terms (EACH differently), is oblivious AND does NOT LIMIT OUR EFFORTS TO ATTEMPTS to ENRICH the OTHER PERSON.
OUR ATTEMPTS to ENRICH OTHERS, MAY BE RESTRICTED ONLY "INTERNAL CONTROLLER", ENRICHING US HUMAN.
WELL, it is NOT NECESSARY!<