And You on Victory Day, Mr. bofara...
I admire the fact that in such a festive Day for me, You, Mr. bofara, decided once again to honor me with Your attention. moreover, for this "heroic" act You had to go across myself, because "...No You (I) don't have nothing more to discuss with You something..."...
And You yourself, though not a must, but so sacrificially, so the "mighty once more unto the breach" - again came here to personally "discuss" with me... and today... but again, not "something", but just me... but Your victim doesn't seem to diminish?... or diminish?... or was it not a sacrifice?...
Because... if another closer look at the motives of Your present sacrifices himself on the altar of some alleged "culture", the picture again is starting to look familiar... very familiar...
bofara wrote:...If You do not like...
For example, who told You that I don't like something? If I asked SPECIFIC gentlemen "officers" to include somewhere in the neighborhood – it means only one thing: me
bored sharing notorious-"officer of fun", I've seen a lot and nothing really informative of these games I already don't extract, so I prefer them not to get involved, and spend YOUR time more interesting way to me.
However, such a situation I usually use as a TEST at level
behavioralrather than abstract culture –
normal people do not usually experience much difficulty in order to RESPECT the request of another person and write him without the annoying and Intrusive "officer" of the attention. But this is when normal people. But some "guards" individuals usually start to spread his fingers even on the feet, PROVING to me that "that's forum" and give "advice" that I didn't ask – and all this with the same maaaalenky Leonenko purpose, oblivious to their own logical failures – because I can write: "Mr. bofara, "that's the forum" – or are You against freedom of speech? Or perhaps You are against freedom of speech specifically for me? That is, You are likely to for freedom only for himself, my dear? And the others have disciplined to fulfill Your the type of "advice", and it would be better just to keep quiet"? Where does it say that the forum should not be treated with specific requests to specific people?
As for the "moderator" is right... for me there "inconvenient" message... any message talks about its author – and from this point of view they are all equally "convenient" for anyone interested in people. So Your "advice" once again fall into the mark: I don't plan to appeal "to the authorities" for sanctions or, especially, require this "power" for himself. And we with You, Mr. bofara, too, are very different from each other... You seem to just prefer to refer to "the authorities"?...
Conclusion: it is obvious that You, under whatever pretext here, in my themes, nor there, always keep in your pocket... what's funny Zhvanetskiy:
http://mp3.w2w.ru/jvanetsky/mp3/kroshki/24.mp3
And Your every appearance here confirms it, alas... But, you know, in that sense, I prefer to follow the recommendations of Alexander Pushkin:
"...The behest of God, o Muse, be obedient,
Insults without fearing, without demanding a wreath,
Praise and slander accept indifferently..."
So you can continue Your stalking activities, time of the request before You did not have... happens...

<