According to the method of turning the pages rhythmically pronounced some positive short phrase like: "See - remember - know", or even shorter: "Remember-Know".Энди wrote:Can more about like soft?
Photochemie: practice
-
Андрей Патрушев
- Автор сайта
- Posts:10238
- Joined:Tue May 30, 2006 20:17
- Has thanked: 134 times
- Been thanked: 556 times
Re: Photochemie: practice
OOOАндрей Патрушев wrote:According to the method of turning the pages rhythmically pronounced some positive short phrase like: "See - remember - know", or even shorter: "Remember-Know".
- Владимир Никонов 2
- Автор сайта
- Posts:820
- Joined:Thu Oct 26, 2006 19:52
- Has thanked: 20 times
- Been thanked: 28 times
Re: Photochemie: practice
I think that photochemie is a common speed reading + magic effect for beauty.
Consciousness very quickly highlights the information, even created the effect of synchronism (http://www.b17.ru/blog/420/) and this can explain the easy finding of information in postprocedure. But download information is half the battle. Her still you need to recognize and most importantly UNDERSTAND. If people do not know the terms, photocity, for example, a textbook on mathematics for him is meaningless.
Consciousness very quickly highlights the information, even created the effect of synchronism (http://www.b17.ru/blog/420/) and this can explain the easy finding of information in postprocedure. But download information is half the battle. Her still you need to recognize and most importantly UNDERSTAND. If people do not know the terms, photocity, for example, a textbook on mathematics for him is meaningless.
Re: Photochemie: practice
And if before that prattchett Glossary matimatike?Владимир Никонов wrote: If people do not know the terms, photocity, for example, a textbook on mathematics for him is meaningless.
Everywhere IMHO we need a systematic approach!!!
Re: Photochemie: practice
In General, from Percy Shelley to the course prilagayutsya many cassettes or sit with different music and navorotami is it possible to create at least part of the materials for systematization of work in potocani?Андрей Патрушев wrote:According to the method of turning the pages rhythmically pronounced some positive short phrase like: "See - remember - know", or even shorter: "Remember-Know".Энди wrote:Can more about like soft?
Re: Photochemie: practice
what does it mean to CREATE??? Percy Shelley has already created English materials (rutracker to help you) and A. Patrushev made the Russian abormot (link somewhere above), A. Patrushev and V. Nikonov moved some books (there are in Cuba and Ugsome information) sho... ischo required? to organize, IMHO, nothing...Энди wrote:is it possible to create
most importantly practice! I have decided in advance policital, and the next day, in the old way -- thoughtful reading (the type of activation for the most stupid), only to miss every slag ballast... of the history and all sorts of blah-blah
-
Андрей Патрушев
- Автор сайта
- Posts:10238
- Joined:Tue May 30, 2006 20:17
- Has thanked: 134 times
- Been thanked: 556 times
Re: Photochemie: practice
The right approachЗОМБИ wrote:most importantly practice! I have decided in advance policital, and the next day, in the old way -- carefully read
Re: Photochemie: practice
Andy
Yes while in any way, the holidays have shifted the priorities the other way, BJ decided to bungle
more

Yes while in any way, the holidays have shifted the priorities the other way, BJ decided to bungle
more
Re: Photochemie: practice
http://openmagic.org/ph/showthread.php?t=1Энди wrote:how to cook where is the recipe?
Re: Photochemie: practice
belief -- an opinion formed as a result of conscious processing of information
suggestion -- an opinion formed as a result of unconscious acceptance of information as fact
in this case, the question is: how to deal with them coming to PS resulted potocani, let's say I don't agree with the author, and this infa fell to the subcortex... how to be friends of my family beliefs and the resulting potocani diametrically opposed views
purely theoretical question of course, it is necessary to try how to check how always not clear
suggestion -- an opinion formed as a result of unconscious acceptance of information as fact
in this case, the question is: how to deal with them coming to PS resulted potocani, let's say I don't agree with the author, and this infa fell to the subcortex... how to be friends of my family beliefs and the resulting potocani diametrically opposed views
purely theoretical question of course, it is necessary to try how to check how always not clear
Re: Photochemie: practice
By and large, all passing through us one way or another sooner or later gets in the subcortex, but it does not mean that we agree with all of this))) Information is received NOTE. Just now everybody knows that and you can quickly change the site picture of the world given all the data.
-
Андрей Патрушев
- Автор сайта
- Posts:10238
- Joined:Tue May 30, 2006 20:17
- Has thanked: 134 times
- Been thanked: 556 times
Re: Photochemie: practice
By and large, many of the beliefs we have formed, but in the ordinary reading books just because we liked the manner of presentation of the author... Well, everything You read (see, hear) is passed through these filters (to form opinions). These filters cost higher consciousness and filtered the flow of information, in fact, in any state of consciousness. Thus, the chance to pick up something harmful to life and, conversely, to miss something very useful, IMHO, equal... 
Re: Photochemie: practice
I agree in principle.Андрей Патрушев wrote:By and large, many of the beliefs we have formed, but in the ordinary reading books just because we liked the manner of presentation of the author... Well, everything You read (see, hear) is passed through these filters (to form opinions). These filters cost higher consciousness and filtered the flow of information, in fact, in any state of consciousness. Thus, the chance to pick up something harmful to life and, conversely, to miss something very useful, IMHO, equal...
IN ADDITION TO EQUAL CHANCES.
THEY ARE NOT ALWAYS EQUAL.
Here's a version with which you can argue, you can accept, or partially accept.
We don'T know what life is a reflection of ourselves, our beliefs, attitudes, and paradigms. We look at the world through the prism of their own understanding of life and finding all new and new confirmations of its existing and already established views.
How they are born – BELIEFS?
Imagine a world of Your deep belief as a state that was settled by citizens from the moment of Your birth. Every citizen is the opinion of You, which You have heard. It does not matter whose opinion it was, whether it Merited an opinion whether that opinion. The only difference is that the authoritative opinion or the opinion of which You touched, repeatedly scrolled in your head and put Your "state" a homogeneous group of citizens.
Over time, Your "state" was formed of the party – "Fair", "Good", "Clever", "Fair", "Angry", "Jealous", "Cowardly", etc.
With the increase in the number of parties is Your "state" strengthened Your characteristics. A more numerous party demanded that the "state" of the relevant external policy, i.e. demanded from You the corresponding manifestations in life.
{Suppose you have a situation that requires instant decisions. Immediately You have in mind, there are various options for how to act at this moment, and at a deep level, You declare a referendum on "How Now to act?".
"Fair" vote, that the decision was honest, Smart over smart, "Tricky" - a cunning, etc.
The result will be a decision that will satisfy the most strong parts of Your "country", but in real life we see behaviors consistent with the main features – Your characteristic features.}
It should be stressed that Your "country" is inhabited, not only by the citizens who evaluate You, but also citizens who are native speakers of opinions about what is good, what is bad, what is right what is wrong, how to behave, what to do, with whom to communicate, etc. and they also vote...
This is your subconscious. Everything that you once saw and heard, everything that cause you to have feelings or have influenced you – all this influenced your beliefs.
However, not all citizens of Your "deep country" vote on all issues. For example, if the task of nailing is not needed: honesty, integrity, etc., Respectively, on the specific issue of vote "relevant party" or even individuals, if the question is narrow enough.
An example, of course, quite simplified, but gives a good understanding. For completeness, here it remains to note that all of the rest: a congenital form and the motives (information metabolism) and physiological processes - the subconscious is not.
So now we know:
The subconscious is the totality of the opinions and images that we received in life that govern our consciousness and our behavior.
Above is not mine.
So, depending on his past life and received life experience, we have something in accordance with what we are. That is, the offender now believes that people......., and according to this he has the right of these people to Rob, beat, and so on. In accordance with his criminal specialty.
People who grew up among good and decent people, in fact receives further confirmation. That people are good and honest.
All very multivariate but the premise that the person receives or missing in your life is bad or good porovnu, at least, controversial.
P. S. the Authorship of this conditional description of our life belief is Konstantin Sigov of Kiev.<
Re: Photochemie: practice
Bold
this description I think someone had a post somewhere on the forum, as familiar as it looks
K-13
and I remember one person called the man without a rod, like amorphous (flexes by itself, and it was
) -- amorphous, IMHO, is the movement picture of the world as an opportunity to make changes accepting or rejecting new or old and not be as Orthodox naacog that the word chakra shies stroke.
-----------------
here I have a new entry to photocatalyst, knocked out a couple of people in the group development or individual but with the competitive effect...
in General as a concept can offer the following "prefix" to koob.ru
the online Web2.0, where users will fill the base of the activation issues.
That is, the user reads the book and creative list of questions and answers to activate.
New users are admitted to the database when you make the n-Noe number of lists for activation of the books. You can start with one book.
------------------
thank you all for the answers
this description I think someone had a post somewhere on the forum, as familiar as it looks
K-13
and I remember one person called the man without a rod, like amorphous (flexes by itself, and it was
-----------------
here I have a new entry to photocatalyst, knocked out a couple of people in the group development or individual but with the competitive effect...
in General as a concept can offer the following "prefix" to koob.ru
the online Web2.0, where users will fill the base of the activation issues.
That is, the user reads the book and creative list of questions and answers to activate.
New users are admitted to the database when you make the n-Noe number of lists for activation of the books. You can start with one book.
------------------
thank you all for the answers
Re: Photochemie: practice
I and post. And on the forum and l/s has offered to send You a full description.ЗОМБИ wrote:Bold
this description I think someone had a post somewhere on the forum, as familiar as it looks