The original question - I hope, at

[Сехмет]

To ask nobody else can, there is more people understand what it is and won't tell me shit, so ask.
Is it normal to fear that the emergence of the ability to influence reality it would be wrong and insulting to other people? It seems like everything in the world - puppets, and there are no accidents - everything is perceived as mandatory. Somehow unpleasant this treatment. In short, speak up))

[Маг.нет]

.
I think fear is not normal. Fear is a reaction to unknown danger. It is possible to learn and the fear passes.... or goes into stress if there is due reason (a real danger the body in the moment or the future). As for "other people", there is every measures himself, his sense of responsibility and accept the laws of the universe (World picture). General (all) rule no.



Sincerely, MAG.no

[Сканер]

In principle, as everywhere there are two answers to the question, two opposing points of view. He took a third. Good, bad or whatever so be it. Your answer will still choose you. As well as be responsible for their choices. ALL WE HAVE NOW IS A REFLECTION OF OUR DECISIONS. There comes a point when you realize the illusory nature of the concepts of good and evil, good or bad. It has no values. He took the prntsipe to relate to OTHERS AS I WOULD WANT THAT TREATED YOU. Although now he also ceases to be relevant and begins to dissolve... your question inspired by the education of previous years, see the limit (frame), which are difficult to pick out from your consciousness. Yes, and in fact people will not notice mainly that someone uses them, because it always has been. I think it's better to get rid of limitations that would prevent development. But again the choice is yours. It's all relative.......

[Маг.нет]

.
I agree in principle, but for myself (and only myself), I have some corrections:

THAT's ALL WE HAVE NOW IS a REFLECTION of our DECISIONS.

....for the most part, but there are "echoes of a distant past" of my personality, but my Consciousness and the trends of the future....

to relate to OTHERS AS I WOULD WANT THAT TREATED YOU.

....any law in the World has the two foci, as the bilateral interaction, taking for himself this law, except the right, there is responsibility inherent in the accepted picture of the World, but not the fact that the opponent also adopts the same view of the World, so I reserve the right (prescribed law in more detail) in the case of these paintings. As studying the works of Peter Ouspensky, but rather a survey of the contradictions revealed in the Bible, drew attention to the fact that indeed the Bible for different points of view (frequency bands) has a different meaning, here as an example of the parse at first glance, two contradictory phrases: "an eye for an Eye" and "Struck on the right cheek - substitute the left" brought me closer to the understanding of the need for additional conditions and different reactions, in principle, on similar (at first glance) the action for the different individuals (of the World).

Good, bad or whatever so be it.

....here I have a slightly different opinion: "it will be as it should be inside my picture of the World", i.e. taking a certain picture of the World, I accept it with all its laws, or do not accept.... and to underline this I want to be, but it is the commercials that I have does not work yet, the World is multidimensional, complex creature, with many relationships between its levels and elements, you need "0" to prescribe all the details of his picture of the World (the Contract), functioning not only in domestic but also in the outside World, i.e. some rules, there may not be enough, but the desire still need to have the capacity (sufficient capacity for Personal Strength for such interactions with the World (Worlds), the creation of our own World, as one of the...., applicable to ambient).
Although the add-on (detailed) and adjustments not inconsistent with the rules allowed.... Or local anomalies....



Sincerely, MAG.no<

[Сехмет]

Thanks for the replies, I didn't think to look from such point of view what's good for me), Even something like the realization it was his own issue. Thank you

[Сканер]

Try to take the essence of things, and the spectra can have any shade.........

Scanner wrote(a):to relate to OTHERS AS I WOULD WANT THAT TREATED YOU. ....any law in the World has the two foci, as the bilateral interaction, taking for himself this law, except the right, there is responsibility inherent in the accepted picture of the World, but not the fact that the opponent also adopts the same view of the World, so I reserve the right (prescribed law in more detail) in the case of these paintings.

this phrase is universal.......... ))))))))))))) like its not cool, it always to go smoothly without changing its essence..... Few of those who are making fun of defenseless animals would be the animal is bullied. GIMP do not take)))) in principle, it is possible to take, but that's another story although the common denominator......

And we can talk endlessly)))))))))))) When you can be in the head from two opposite points of view and prederzhivaetes third)))))))))))
Try to take the essence of things, and the spectra can have any shade and reflect the inner world beings. Therefore, there exists the concept of reflectivity (duality) of the world that the world is just a reflection of yourself. I mean, what is my will))))))), what you sow so shall you reap))))

An eye for an eye old Testament, there is a lot of blood....
About cheeks already Evangelie, the coming of Jesus........for me, the teachings of Jesus corrupted after his death "strong" of this world.

[Маг.нет]

.
I a little about other.... People are different.... And the principles they are different. Referring always to the opponent as you wish attitude, you may encounter inappropriate (relative) reaction, just because the opponent has not the slightest desire to support this principle and to reciprocate (in principle, at first glance, it is his right, in accordance with its view of the World) can do as he sees fit, not taking into account a good location to him. "You give him candy, and he is thank you - in the teeth", "You give him a second and he was on the nose", "You give him a third, suddenly changed his mind (after all, he treats would have responded with gratitude), and he....", well, I think it is clear that the formula is good, in the circle of friends-friends-relatives can say universal, but life is more versatile, so where it is necessary to say thank you somewhere "in the mouth to give" (though I think not to would like to), so I think not the fact that you need to create such self-restraint, because the opponent does not necessarily support the same principle and to reciprocate, and I masochism as something abhorrent, I don't like from someone's stupidity to suffer.
Maybe someone sees differently....



Sincerely, MAG.no

[Сканер]

Well, if given the teeth, it means he wants candy, and in the teeth ))) and you give him candy Oh... mm as it's all rewarded handsomely. You judge from their point of view, and to understand the need to have your...

[Маг.нет]

.
I'm a long time in his life persistently adhered to the principle You described, but assessing the results of the event on the basis of combined experience, has made additions and adjustments, ie, I can do so (in accordance with the above principle) can very often do so, but nothing prevents to do and otherwise, just what some other appropriate response to external stimulus, sometimes preventive, although ready, that someone will say the same thing, or something else, in General, stereotypes are comfortable in familiar situations where you don't need to think and predictable (in principle) a result that satisfies me completely.... if not, then turn on completely different algorithms and interactions. I am ready to act as it sees fit point useful, it is ready to take responsibility for his actions, in the amounts provided my worldview.



Sincerely, MAG.no

[Сканер]

I do so not because they are expecting something from someone, I'm doing this for myself......
I smile not for anyone else, but yourself, make someone nice not for anyone else, but yourself....
I hit someone, not for someone, but for myself... I'm SELFISH..... because doing everything to please yourself first and foremost... And a deluded one who thinks that doing that for someone ))))))))))

With you pleasant to communicate, but so lazy to write a lot.........

But doing because you want to, you give yourself the freedom in the actions of others what we have ourselves? or would you like anyone to restrict your freedom because he believes that it is more properly fed?

[Маг.нет]

.
Oh, want me every, and in short time the same thing in different ways, then this way and that, then upside down, but the act accomplishes the consideration of the principles of expediency. Everyone (in my opinion) is free in his actions, if he himself does not limit and is ready to bear responsibility for them (or not ready, and "what will be will be", but understands that any response may or may not understand.... that's not the point). I don't think anyone has the right to restrict someone from only their own personal reasons (that's how I want it, so be it, even if it violates someone's interests), although intuition can sometimes push to preventive measures, the act has not yet finalized, but the responsibility for it has come. Honestly philosophizing can reveal different facets of interactions, it is easier to see the feasibility of a particular event, but in any case, often the "life circumstances itself puts everything in its place", who would themselves not imagine....
Do not break someone else's freedom.... but that does not mean that there will be attempts to disrupt yours.



Sincerely, MAG.no

[Сканер]

))) you are right again))