1. I use the St. Petersburg emerald (couple of different models, too lazy to look), specially bought WITHOUT osmosis.
2. A part of my life is associated indirectly with the industry and analytical chemistry. Parents graduated from the Mendeleev and both worked in Sredmash (current Atommash). Mom specifically focused on the methods of analysis of contamination of sewage (in terms of their development and the actual analysis, and not only on objects Sredmash). I in a youth was fond of chemistry, read special literature, occupied a place at the Olympics.... this is a prelude. The point is that I pretty well represent the technical side of many things.
And so - mineralizer. Is that in fact? this thing that spoils that did the cleaning to him. Justify. Mineralizator contains a number of salts. Where they came from is necessary to explain? they poured from the container, where the salt - industrial production. They just more to take from where. The only "natural" way to fill the mineralizer - miss clean water, for example from the well through the evaporation process. But it's too expensive, just beyond all reasonable limits. So the salt in the water passes through a fall of the usual reagents.
There are several funny moments occur. On the one hand, even with modern methods, it is very difficult to make an ACCURATE analysis of natural salts. Why? because there is a chemical and chemical-spectroscopic method. This is when we perform at every joint analysis with the indicator, and the brightness thereof, a spectrograph, a very precisely defined content. But connections so much that the analysis is very accurate - can leave too much time. Therefore, the analysis carried out in groups and exemplary.
The second option, massspectrometry. Upriver water, the resulting residue, in a spectrograph it to burn and the spectral lines obtained contained controls. I.e. "the periodic table", but not the exact chemical. the composition of salts and their relationship. We usnam how many magnesium, sodium, iron, aluminum, carbon, chlorine (in bound form) and so on. But not the exact composition of salts.
Even a combination of methods will not give the full picture of the real content of salts... Only a sketch, roughly corresponding. This "outline" you get what you need to fill the mineralizer.
How does it take? salt? Warehouse chemical. reagents. As the mineralizer contain relatively a lot of salt (they need to be changed rarely), their value speaks for itself. To apply they can (cost-effective) only salt KHCH. I.e., chemically pure. Such salts contain a lot of impurities, except for the connection. In an ordinary natural water of these impurities can never be! The following degree of purity of analytical grade or CDSA (apply domestic labelling, but not the essence), i.e., "pure for analysis" and "pure for spectral analysis" - very expensive, since their production involves a lot of complicated cleaning processes. To apply them in the mineralizer is too expensive. When the mineralizer was very expensive.
Thus, reverse osmosis removes all salts are natural, then puts them there seems to be-analogue containing impurities introduced in the chemical industry. Take any bottle of chemical.reagents GRADE and there on the label will be a list of potential impurities (so-and-so not more than a certain fraction of a percent and so the list goes on).
At the same time, a PULSE treatment of water itself may CHANGE the mineral composition thereof. Ie is cold fusion.
An example of this is, for example, published information on installing "Energeia-2" and lots of other information.
An example is the processing of high-voltage pulses of distilled water made me - as a result water fell on a large amount of precipitate compounds of IRON (judging by the color and other information known to me, the analysis did not yet, although the water kept in a closed bottle, in fact the same, which was taking the distillate). The process was something similar to "Energonika", the electrodes are not dissolved and were platinized. The iron in this volume of them proslosti could not
![Smile :)](./images/smilies/icon_smile.gif)
In a statement the same producers of BSL (and not only), special frequency pattern of operation of the device, contributes to the normalization of min. water composition. And insoluble compounds aluminium, help to make extra of the same.
For example I, with the significant vodozabor from my deep reservoir of water (not Skarina, but a well depth of 25 meters - mine a whole, thanks to the multiple layers of natural clay, carefully isolated from ground water), is water with a suspension of clay-small particles of sand and iron. All of this is not filtered mechanically, but not annoying. Ie if you put 5 micron or whatever the smallest fur. the filter on the highway, it just becomes clogged and the pressure drops, and the Muti-part still passes through it.
In ordinary water, all is not good. In General, drinking too. But after BSL-I it is immediately crystal clear. All the foam in the top makes.
Accordingly, in situations when I have no running water (which is either a problem, or winter, before the pipes get warm after a cold if our house was not) - BSL is the only applicable just the cleaner-activator (from the bucket and poured all the cases).
In the city, after the emerald, it is also easily applied and me this process is not a bit strained.
And to expose the water to the osmosis, I'll be only in case of heavy dirt and real threat of life from them (i.e. not long-term, and specific now). In this case I have bought and installed a couple osmosis systems are the simplest, in case of emergency.
Yes. If the emerald may also (due to the pulsed nature of the reactor feed) min. to change the composition of the water, some things like cunning of organic matter, it may not win - just do not enter into the process, the molecules are too big are not affected by electrolysis. BSL is just make them in suspension. It is for this reason I took myself in LA BSL is another newly.
Each device has its pros and cons.
BSL has a long history and reliable and stupid. His service personally, I do not bother 10 minutes every two weeks. Easily compatible as the last phase with the other systems or may be a "field" option.
All of this from experience, not words from advertising. I to it generally there is no case. Profits from sales of their office I don't get, and the office gets think penny (compared to other products of the BSL-and arbitrarily small value, and added to the heap due to the fact that the people interested in water).
I personally recommend BSL as dull and reliable, and therefore a "must have" system to a bunch of friends and relatives a long time ago and no one's complained yet, although the idea of the availability on the market of other products they have too, to put it mildly.<