Nufit, there are specific physical effects not explained by modern theory.
But there are specific physical effects, is not recognized by the modern theory publichno, but recognized at the level of institutions where they studied and have a very specific progress. Unfortunately, not all can write publicly without framing people, so I brought a couple first (but not only) the classic examples.
Because You saw only what in your opinion is not true, here is more specific data.
Shahparonov did the capacitors in the form of a möbius strip, which was created in its work of education in the form of ball lightning. In his works described and described with the individual experiments, which were conducted in quite home research many years ago. The history of the topic outlined in his articles as the occupants of the room. Again, I cited the example, it works because it was done in the Institute's conditions, because there were witnesses because there was and is visible to the eye without case by instruments effects and because these effects repeat lap.
Two effects that are echoed by my colleagues - receive formations a La ball lightning or plasmoid and rotation meliphaga capacitor on suspension (long) at a constant charge. What "classics" is not explained.
Later will post photos and links to videos that was not unfounded.
The second given link. Rinat graduated from MIPT, as well as You have developed some Ter. database explaining some anomalies. Some brand new anomalies have received, see for example the link to experiment with a superconducting coil, which throw non-magnetic materials.
I'm not talking about his theory that it is worse or better - it is different. On the basis of his theory he suggested theoretically there is some effect in rapidly rotating flywheels, depending on material, speed, diameter and the presence of "puller" and the effect was confirmed, being played by the same for many parts of the world by the hands of other people. In the simplest practical application has a different flow in a particular combustion reaction, in particular in internal combustion engines. And a host of other anomalies. Part of this is described on the website, links have been given above.
Experimentally confirmed by the measurements WITH the SN on the engine, measure the temperature of the burning bottled gas (propane-butane without boost), measuring fuel consumption and a lot less manifested but very easy fixed effects not explained by the classics, the existence of which is generally not possible.
Ie, if You through its Ter.bases explain some effects INCORRECTLY interpreted in formal theories and present a coherent model, which is slender in the framework of these effects (discovered by official science), I tried to show the presence, so to speak, the reverse side. Moreover, the examples cited first and can continue. And brought the ones that can be on the knee to feel and to repeat it myself for minimal cost (of course if you wish). Gave examples which do not fit into your description, but unable to meet him, if his respectable raskinuti, taking into account the fact that the world is much more than is available on the official basis of the experimental data.
PS About Grebennikova, sorry, You are wrong, I am 100% sure, not only just its platform well connected with your theory. the development, just limited to the aforesaid description to the availability of software algorithms, and I have good reason to believe that these software algorithms are controlled, in and out local anomalies beyond the known science experiments.
By the way, since , sorry, "ran" in Grebennikov, which is a hoaxer certainly was not, I remind you another famous case. Very real and equally colourful personality - John Worrell Keeley ALSO built a flying platform, and DEMONSTRATED it publicly, there were many people and it is documented press... how many other ordinary things made by his hands.
What am I?
To ensure that no important disputes of theorists, an important practice, but it goes much further formally known part now.
You've created a beautiful Ter. apparatus for a simplified treatment of a number of phenomena of this digital
world.... if you extend the development overall will be not good.
The examples and many other. The ones when the "program" does not behave classically.
You just described only a part, and yet only the top... the tip of the iceberg, which is huge.
Above mentioned Shaimuratov Rinat, being open to new things, conducted a simple experiment for yourself... from a purely "biological" transmission of influence from their primitive and simple "fan". He promtoional the signal from a completely unscientific way (on my advice) used for this text printout.... nonsense, if not make golograficheskie world and some other aspects plus placed next to the samples of their tissues (according to my Council, namely nails and hair) and was very surprised that both worked. and the last - on neogranichennoi distance from the installation of biological effects on the body kept going.
Understand. I could care less. I use absolutely other and working methods. You do understand that the world is digital.... the best tool for working with him has been and will be one our consciousness.
The examples are many. From Tesla, who claimed. there is no difference in experiment set in the minds and on the real layout and to H Ledbetter that head read the structure of electronic shells of many elements of the periodic system, before it was "discovered" by official science. And there is DOCUMENTARY evidence, it is available.
I'm just trying to help You see the world a little wider, which will make your Ter the base a little wider, and the world a little better....
By the way with the site paleohnolog.ru You seem familiar?
There a couple of recent articles clearly shows that, for the historians interpret as anything but true frescoes, such as the Egyptian, but not only, hiding the view of the savages of the world at the level of the "stands on two elephants", and knowledge of the digital nature of the world, very similar to what You write.
In other words - it was known and earlier.... but a lot of knowledge, great sadness.... here's someone we "protect" it.... from a full understanding of the world.
Therefore, I propose not just to write articles and as bad in modern physics, specifically to make the theory had moved ON.
If will not stop here and will try to integrate anomalous effects, about part of which I wrote, with his theory (in terms of explanation, not denial, at least that 10 or more people can easily repeat the experiment with a single result, you can only deny giving a different explanation for the results of the experiment). In General, if you can integrate it in theory - promise publicly with all the forum - to give money to the circulation of books, would promote its spread, pay for some Internet advertising.
I was completely serious and no jokes. I do not need anything. Potentially even a return on investment. I need this "bridging" individuals studying the anomalies of the creature appeared. It is beneficial for the world.
Oh, and the last... I am aware that many inventors of new devices and new theories, not always in all his conclusions to the end can be adequate. And that is a simple and perfectly normal explanation. All of these inventors lose built by society and experience a world picture in his mind, she collapses due to the presence of anomalies in it. An attempt to "patch up" and leads to sometimes strange interpretations. But this does not mean that it is worth the entire source is considered not credible.
More precisely, it does not mean that is to assimilate and build on the skeleton of one of the destroyed fortress, its, new... separating yourself from others... that's all, for example, strive either to decry or explain the Searl disk.
And I have never seen people from science are no posts about learning HIS version of the digital world, but it is... because there is inside the guts and principles of the control program put in the forefront, but who has studied the core of his work? Yes, they are not posted publicly, Yes worth the money... so what? why I went out and bought, and the rest - rejected, but explain.
To begin with, and understanding of what I think is enough.
You can take this as an invitation to cooperation.
I show the effects. Repeat. Laboratory stunt, but real.
You complete the theory.
Only a few specific effects, since they are all similar in fact.
After I promise to organize digital edition world free of charge. All this openly (i.e. publicly available secure discussion and the final completed theory).
Well?
Yes, and cheat I am not suggesting.
I propose to explain physically existing effects.<