Page 15 of 15

Re: Feedback on test products

Posted: Tue Feb 23, 2016 11:46
by Aura
Милая wrote:something tells me that everything about a new product technology SAM the structurer of the space has already been determined and whatever proposals and initiatives did not come from members of the forum on the testing of the product and even the results is not affected.
Does
Ланада wrote:And nookular Structurer want to protest
it will not be the pendant, the basic version of products - stationary, though it may be, and an additional, made for another very interesting principles, in particular, uses the basic principles of togeometry (the pyramid in the first place), other systemic principles, rather than in coulombs, the product works with the architecture of GEIP directly, not through function, as in coulombs, and many other interesting points. Question test are still open.

Re: Feedback on test products

Posted: Tue Feb 23, 2016 18:20
by Фиолет
For some reason I had felt intuitively,that this device will be stationary,and works with the space :)

Re: Feedback on test products

Posted: Tue Feb 23, 2016 18:21
by Фиолет
And in this space is much easier and more interesting to work with them and with GEIP :)

Re: Feedback on test products

Posted: Wed Feb 24, 2016 0:48
by Милая
Аура wrote:it will not be the pendant, the basic version of products - stationary, though it may be, and an additional, made for another very interesting principles, in particular, uses the basic principles of togeometry (the pyramid in the first place), other systemic principles, rather than in coulombs, the product works with the architecture of GEIP directly, not through function, as in coulombs, and many other interesting points.
Read this post and came up with the idea with the word "pyramid". We can assume that the famous pyramids were not built by advanced civilizations, and developed civilization there, which was erected a pyramid, i.e. a pyramid "worked" as the outliner space, creating favorable conditions for the development of civilization. So...another inspiration just :)

If the new product is laid down such a principle, the place of residence could be turned into "an oasis of prosperity," for example, my Outback turned into a "new Vasyuki". :) In the Outback, by the way, the result can be more pronounced, because in big cities a lot of external influences. Thinking out loud but... :)

Re: Feedback on test products

Posted: Wed Feb 24, 2016 9:52
by Фиолет
Although a lot of evidence that the pyramids were built still it advanced civilizations.And Akash,and other physical sources of information.
There is a pyramid and on the depth of the oceans,and much larger than on land,they are on the moon,on Mars and other planets :)

Re: Feedback on test products

Posted: Thu Feb 25, 2016 14:55
by Aura
In different periods of time one civilization or another belonged to their volumetric perception. Important here is the principle, and his expression – a moment of peace – can be laid both in structure and in character. Here, for example, in the subject Architecture GAIP put a lot of structures, someone reads them directly, someone takes from different sources of information, but what is their value? There is an expression, and a mapping, you can virtually Express the real principle or realistically display the virtual. Here again it is important that someone who reads and displays. Is the symbol of the point, someone sees the point, someone axle. This moment only visual display. Yes, there is a pyramid on Mars and on the moon, under water, it is a fact, or knowledge reached by the perception on the principle of visual comparison. The question is, where does that leave us, as a visual embodiment. Any information has a time display. And to set the perception to, say, the same principle of the pyramid, you need at least to realize four-dimensional space, that is, to perceive temporal changes. To describe multi-dimensional perception of words is very difficult, almost impossible, if only for dancecostumes figurative level. Probably the first thing you need to do is to understand that the perceived visual image (pyramid) is just one of the projections (two-dimensional or three-dimensional). The tip of the iceberg. To understand what a projection is something more – already to dive into reality. A touch of reality – it's something else.