Артфан wrote: You bought a product super complicated and require simple words to describe its effect on You.
Overall, the creation of a certain theoretical Glossary about the use of products SAM pondered. Not planned, but was considered
Yes, there is a common theoretical base, such as what is GEIP, domain, EOM, space, rytmeposten, frequency, space, etc. on the other hand, there is a clear understanding that the development of a software process in a theoretical base is just the law of conservation of energy always reduces the chances of its actual practical application. That's why I spend a lot of their personal energy by connecting to HEIP each answer on the forum, so as many can see my answers to the same questions from different users are different. Shura and many others probably or probably not quite understand the value of the lack of dry ready theoretical answers to the questions. Like "how does the pendant horn of plenty?" - "so-and-so works...will do action A and get result B". Yes, you can admit dissatisfaction and the dissatisfaction of some users by content and/or number of responses. Nobody thought that it is not a coincidence? It is not from the desire not to answer or to attend the forum?
I'll start again with a brain
The brain is lazy. It will be carried out on any tricks, internal and external, not to work. We want ready-made algorithms and ready-made answers. They say, write an algorithm what to do and I'll do it. You can recognize that wherever there are ready algorithms, there is no brain. All try to learn from the experience of ready-made algorithms. But here we must think and consider the factors that the algorithm exist in certain settings and a certain space, and other and other parameters (frequency or retroprosthetic) may be non-functional. Worthless. So the best way is to accept the communication on this forum or at least this thread as
the setting.
Let me explain
The setting in terms of contact energies. Setting for something can be perceived as contact energies. A possible contact energies (integration) you need to develop the skill of integration. To explain this skill, refer to the electromagnetic phenomena and the concept of magnetism. From a programmatic point of view, electromagnetism is a physical manifestation of the software level. The manifestation as a reflection. How was the analogy above - there is, for example, water and its inhabitants, and airspace. The ripples on the water (but the way Tesla has so many analogies work ether for clarity, were done on the processes in the water...essential rings it is 100% water understood) reflects the movement of air masses, but the phenomenon itself originates in the atmosphere, which is outside the space of knowledge ...let's say fish, water inhabitants. The fish can see the surface on the water and even have some understanding of this process and even explaining this process, but for fish is limited by the understanding of virtual for her, impossible for her current existence as a result of the perception of the current space - water.
Most interesting is that even if our "fish" - the inhabitant of the aquatic environment, would be able to perceive another space with the help of periscope, you would not see the source of vibrations of another dimension. Because even we, the inhabitants of this space, don't see it
We can see the cause of causes, the pressure difference of different air masses, but there was no one in the weather forecast did not answer about the cause of the pressure difference between the air masses
In other words, answering the question
Shurahere it is important to get to the other in search of answers to their questions, even if it is, and start answering questions yourself.<