manufacturer BJ 3.0 N

[Мирра]

Thank you.

[4444]

interesting topic

manufacturer BJ 3.0 N

[ФилиНН]

I would like to clarify:

P. S. it is Desirable that steps 1-3 were approximately equal time, 4th time is a multiple of the track multiple runs.

If the runs of the track plan to do a few, then while working with mandalas is also better in proportion as many times to increase(except that it has 4 times more time of a single run of the track)?
Not affected negatively if the interruption time between phases 1-3 ? Between runs of the track, if the player is not able to do AutoPower a given number of times?
And again, printouts of mandalas you can reapply, but they're already creased among other things?(if you go out to service with a good printer, it is money-time is worth)
And with the storage of these printouts... They "fonit"-must direct to the place of storing the idea. Appropriate if there is some TB on this?

[Маг.нет]

1. It does not matter. The time specified in the narrative for stages 1-3 is sufficient, but on request can be increased. Let's say this is the stage of "learning" material with "special" it States, the main thing that "met" and "podpravili friend-to-friend" Step 4 - "shift" run through "friends" of the state of the material (structure), Here many times, but I think it is better to bring the run to the end.
2. If small (not enough time on the structural distortion from the interaction of the material with others), then "no problem" when pause is significant (or location of the workpiece abnormally active), it is better to repeat first. Of runs similarly, if the preform is not removed from the package, and most importantly not constrained with the Operator directly, otherwise it is better the whole process to repeat, more of course not, but those will be spelled accurately.
3. Keep what you want, without performing the procedures in "charging the system", they don't work. If not broken and not torn can be reused.


Sincerely, MAG.no

[ФилиНН]

And thank you. The nuances become clear.

[Алексc3000]

Good day, and if the bracelet 2.1 CH. d. as the workpiece to 3.0 N ?

[Логик]

What's the point? Can be cheaper and billet to find. From what you are using 2.1 as the workpiece, 3.0 N more powerful will not.

[Алексc3000]

I already have 3.0 N, made of hematite, just want 3.0 N of ebony, so I think 2.0 or 2.1, use the price is not too different and the charging technology used G2 there which is not all freely available, maybe somebody tried it already?

[Маг.нет]

3.0 N "overwrite" G2 (BJ 2.0), so it has absolutely no difference is the billet charging G2 or not, in any case will be equivalent to 3.0 N. If the financial aspect is indifferent, use as blanks BJ 2.0 or 2.1, but at least any 2.x possible, anything that does not interfere, but the result will be 3.0 N no differences (with the same material bracelet). The material may affect the quality of the 3.0, but not significantly.


Sincerely, MAG.no

[Алексc3000]

MAG.no Roger that, thanks for the reply.

[АКВО]

Maybe this will help something, quote Michael openmagic:

explain.
full FOR on Lite 3.0 is obtained when charging the bracelet with CO (2.0)
when the charging process 3.0 N... for the third version also formed, but the process lacks the energy component (which is in the S series) to overgrow in the charging process is complete (if you have 2.0, then there is guaranteed work 2.0 charging system).
Cloud 3.0 has other qualities than cloud 2.0, and they really exist as though in parallel.

And when you consider that:
In addition, in the 2.1 added the following features:
- better integration with БЖ3.0 all versions (need to add the program КО2.0, since 3.0 came later).

Conclude in favor of BJ 2.1

[Маг.нет]

Integration products (systems) and the structuring (charging) of the workpiece - are two different questions.

And why 2.1 and then it is not a Panacea? Because P 2.1 more manifest, and TO "sorgoleone" - in Administrator mode (can be programmed), albeit restricted systematically.... though perhaps reprogram to 3.0 and are not available (restricted), you need to learn.

Well, about TO complete at the N-charge is necessary to study each preset on the potential here Michael_ wrote on the issue and TO N otherwise, look for. And in 3.0 N "special" CO - cluster type.... it "lives" separately from TO 2.0 and has priority before 2.0. What type of "primary".
In any case, for clarification of this inconsistency on the issue and TO N better to Mihailo.
In my "charging system" of the energy potential for full-fledged "cluster clouds" enough is that in S the charging more clearly defined "boundaries and rules 3.0".


Sincerely, MAG.no

[Алексc3000]

Shorter gained 2.1 C. D., well-made bracelet, one can see people trying on the production, well done, nothing bad to say I can not wear it, then maybe still will make the three-pointer out of it, but maybe not, that's only one question torments should the bracelet is made of natural ebony wood is painted or not ???, 2.6 painted less.

[Маг.нет]

I have a Panacea h\d also gave the juice a couple of days, then stopped....



Sincerely, MAG.no

[Алексc3000]

Well if so, and the fact that wet scary even the hands are not really colones.

[Маг.нет]

Nothing terrible, color and texture does not lose...


Sincerely, MAG.no

[ягуар]

1. you can charge several bracelets, or just one?
2. Naushki immediately wrap with 1 stage or how best to do??

[Маг.нет]

1. how much will be included in the "package" of the mandala;
2. audio accordingly headphones only in the 4th stage.



Sincerely, MAG.no

[ягуар]

thank you

[Димонъ]

MAG.no
"audio and headphones, respectively, only in the 4th stage."

And if you used audio on all four stages? Spoiled? Is it possible(whether you need) to recharge for the new, or does not matter? Thank you.

[Михаил_]

not spoiled, but I would repeat. There is a fundamental subtleties of the process.

[Димонъ]

Thank you. Undone.

[Димонъ]

Opensource projects, eh. Another question. If the mandala is a bit torn(tear on the edge of 2 cm and in the center 2 cm) is possible to use or reprint the new?

[Димонъ]

Maybe you can prozrachnyi tape on the back side to glue?

[Маг.нет]

.
I think (not saw) that it is better to a new listing.
Charging mandala is not a shortcut, and the program, so the details can be important.
But if damage is possible "without a trace" to glue, keeping the pattern, it is possible.




Sincerely, MAG.no