Галатея wrote:Michael will tell you ......... for purposes .............. Tell me what could be the problem why goals in General advances do not have?
Hello,
I think it will be useful for more detailed understanding:
Michael: To the question of the realization of the goals specified in the next branch:
1. The goal should be given a chance - i.e., the time to market on your own actions to achieve it. Because not all goals can be achieved only at the expense of a certain artifact or how it is now fashionable to say, the information modulator. Usually there is a need for real actions of the man himself, perhaps to install some ties, some related transformations in life. In other words, make allowances for what may be a need, I have asked the purpose, to do the actions to achieve it, the course, events, actions will be facilitated by the fact that was happening.
2. Need, on the basis of item 1 and the current situation, to understand that there are goals from this position of "not communicating", which perhaps can be implemented tomorrow or in half a year. Ie, there are some things that seem obvious to us, but really they are poorly achievable due to unseen factors. A little later, it's starting to feel intuitive, as the direction of "no response". Simultaneously there are some more difficult or sometimes even inconceivable objective, which is to realize, oddly enough, easier....
3. Something depends on the bindings of consciousness that is possbile and at the same time hindering factor. The consciousness of doubt.... Can think about the complexity of or just wanting too, pumping from the likelihood energy. Therefore, it is useful to take the targets are not directly tied to immediate personal desires. The more detail the goals or friends or any comic task is implemented, the more consciousness will be adapted to the new style of work with the world. At the same time remember that is important, not statistics, and anomalies identified. Since we cannot estimate the exact contribution of this device or drawing rooms, Radionics, or anything else, you should evaluate anomalies, and to remember only positive incentives. Thus change principle of consciousness with the outside world and each time the work order will go easier.
PS we repeatedly observed over the action of the different mental factors on these or other purposes and have often noticed that the problem is in choosing just the failing paths when the aim is that it is now not attainable although man is not immediately obvious. Increasing time to market or changing the order achieve the objectives, we get the desired result.
red: What exactly means of deflating the probability of energy?
Michael: Let's work with a figurative picture.
Imagine our world in the present (now) = sea of life energy that fills all things, living and not living. Think of it like a vivid picture, which clearly shows all the details.
Now work with the future.
If you've read fry, remember that "Hiking" in the future there are called the "dark side" or "dark side".
Where are all subject to the thoughts. (really, not quite, but close).
Why? It's actually not a fantasy writer, but a completely precise definition. The truth on the "dark side" image may be too bright, but this is already a strong part of our consciousness.
Continue mental experiment.
Every event has a prehistory, which in some sense determines the variation of its future.
This kind of "experience", the personal history of an object, person, place (of anything), also called causality, determines the breadth of options, combined with the surrounding objects. Zone "interlacing" to create a sustainable version of a possible future. Is implemented as a rule only one. The most powerful.
Sometimes enough of the "butterfly effect" to change what it is. Ie a single object fell out of the weave of experience, to create a unified picture of the puzzle gathered otherwise.
But while the future is still the future, still has a lot of versions.
You can present it so the brightness on the perception of the NOW moment is distributed over a hundred variations of a particular scene (event), decaying as in a "shadow". Energy in them is proportionately smaller (by number of versions relatively speaking) and they prioritise just on energy basis. The one where more energy is the most probable version.
Our attention is able to add energy to the desired version (usually this is a special and conscious work by "pumping"), and to eat her out. Usually about a future event it eats it - i.e. thinking about it and wanting it (pulling towards you) we attract to ourselves the energy from still do not exercise and eat it, literally. In the event it becomes smaller and it may not be realized.
Hence the story that many believe is not good shares plans about the future, so as not to disturb their implementation and hence the need to "let go" of the event, not to think about it constantly, to improve the likelihood of its implementation.
This same ability to "grazing" of probabilities can be used especially if we want to exclude a scenario altogether. One of my friend told me that his school years were an amazing friend who is eating probability. When the other eye is swollen, he told the friend about it in a series of "school tomorrow will not go," and inflammation of instantly went pretty much.
The reason grazing is that we pull the energy from the event itself.
If there is a conscious rendering of an event especially, there is a number of determining factors we increase the probability of the event or Vice versa.<
The same was felt in different parts of the body,but this is when I put the anchor to health recovery.
