Post
by Михаил_ » Fri Jun 27, 2014 20:46
Well, the system is very... soaked with it .... it's like a part of it, in fact its internal law. Since a long time and many times top officials openly and to the press saying that do not think of how to fight corruption....
Casuistry in the laws were made not even in this world, and you can always drag and drop solution from one hand is almost the opposite with the same initial data. What You now see. Give "bad" advice. Take action under the internal rules of the system.
Or find out what and how much and think whether it is not more reasonable than idle company, or go through the door above. You don't think you can just rebuild locally the system for themselves? Yes it is possible but you need to do in advance (before check) and very high quality.
In principle, does not exclude as a fact these circumstances, but usually takes them by or softens them.
Well, there are still all sorts of intermediate options.
Plus do org-conclusions ( in the sense that keep in mind for the future where the admitted flaws in the design of activities so that the application of the methods of casuistry possible ). Or hire consultants who have one foot out will have to pay officially to them, they are with its own motives (to share?), although most will be more expensive, but legally and officially.
It's actually just the local world order. Yeah, well, having a bunch of businesses I went through the 90s without "roofs" for example (well, not counting all the correct close friends from the fun places, but not had them to turn to and it was not discussed in advance and knowing the surface never lying )
However, this does not mean that it was "magically caused", rather just competent intuitive maneuvering between all.
Because a quality system is quality system... they are like heaven-the air and water.
And Yes, in the case of inspections had to operate one of these scenarios. Then the truth is easier usually became (turned contact) t/e/ saves time, money, and gives a little more guarantee of business stability, though I never did these questions not involved, my one of business partners working in it was dealt with and he was more than "the system man" and I always just trusted his choice and all. Because he probably would have got in a head butt (I was a little more principled) and knew that it was not the optimal path.
That's not such a folding tip.
Just play the system the script is best (not expensive) way and wrap it up with the benefit ( minimizing the cost of the following tests) + org insights.
I give this advice in particular because it is highly likely You at the moment, their potential resistance to the system spent on already implemented actions. And the system is not even a tank is a continental plate, which suddenly began to move. Clever you to shove foreheads? either to depart or to be on the side of the movement.<
and it would seem so... simple thing..
