Wet BJ is possible.do not want to shoot, not to stretch, although when I go to shower, then take off, not to wet
About stretch - ever line burst, it can be replaced in 5 minutes, the replacement functionality is not affected.
Wet BJ is possible.do not want to shoot, not to stretch, although when I go to shower, then take off, not to wet
The bracelet leaves a phantom body, which is a long time running after the removal, and the removed bracelet is also a workhorse, it should be remembered. I had something similar, but it concerned more the situation, not personal energy. Ie removing the wristband, I found a change in the vector, it was quick and I was a little reticent at the moment. I decided connecting the bracelet to the broadcast. But to be honest it's more a personal problem that needs to be reviewed just. To review you can, including with the bracelet in the broadcast.Артемка wrote: How to remove, feel weak, and after the return of BJ at hand, the weakness goes away, but not as quickly as it comes.
BJ Panacea probably due to greater removal of dependencies and the correct algorithms. Resources for this case are tightened of course, but there are many is not necessary. There is another way to reduce clutter. BJ 2.6 gives good business effects. Well, it's all individual, in principle, women and men might be different. As the age of the people also will decide differently. Range may be suitable for you. Take a look.ольгаша wrote:Hello! What to buy to increase revenue BJ Panacea or Map Alchemy 2 or nookular cornucopia?
Realized approx. have Already got used to it, now seems not so afraid for him .Владимир Ш. wrote: Wet BJ is possible.
About stretch - ever line burst, it can be replaced in 5 minutes, the replacement functionality is not affected.
Thanks for the info. Also connected in the broadcast 2.2 and 2.5. And by the way there is less decay of energy in removing the BJ, especially after connecting the 2.5 for some reason.Мартин wrote:The bracelet leaves a phantom body, which is a long time running after the removal, and the removed bracelet is also a workhorse, it should be remembered. I had something similar, but it concerned more the situation, not personal energy. Ie removing the wristband, I found a change in the vector, it was quick and I was a little reticent at the moment. I decided connecting the bracelet to the broadcast. But to be honest it's more a personal problem that needs to be reviewed just. To review you can, including with the bracelet in the broadcast.Артемка wrote: How to remove, feel weak, and after the return of BJ at hand, the weakness goes away, but not as quickly as it comes.
I'll try to shoot a training video is actually very simple and the people of their binders without me in Moscow to teach turned out for onceМартин wrote:I Have the same rubber as on the original bracelets, but also to link them I can not, under any circumstances. Would be to find a specialist.
I do not what could not, under any circumstances, although the elastic was the same and fingers all over the place. Decided to connect the module "a guide to experience." Over time all tied up, I only had a little stronger at the end of tightening. The module is great, it should be about him not to forget.Михаил_ wrote:I'll try to shoot a training video is actually very simple and the people of their binders without me in Moscow to teach turned out for onceМартин wrote:I Have the same rubber as on the original bracelets, but also to link them I can not, under any circumstances. Would be to find a specialist.
Everything has a logical explanation. The forum is full of information about the broadcast, read. And "distortions" will go away with time.Артемка wrote: And by the way there is less decay of energy in removing the BJ, especially after connecting the 2.5 for some reason.
BJ 2.1 2.1 remain of course.ММ wrote:I mean BJ 2.1 have become known as the 2.4? Not to mix.Михаил_ wrote:this is a 2.4 probably and I think wood here not and just every bracelet has its own specifics, especially with regard to a particular operator and its capabilities, probably You 2.4 somehow better (especially in this quantity).
Replace the thread on a normal do not see any problems, there is even a whole topic about it, or take 1mm elastic thread ( in Russia for example is sold in a network "the Needle" as far as I remember, well, or anywhere where there are products, "Gamma"), or spandex, just to pass more difficult, you have several threads together to fold, but is much longer. Most of my bracelets changed your thread 2-3 times, it is from a couple of years or more, and sometimes likes to break, just in time for the performance of the maximum (as You write - fulfilled desires ). You may want to try 2.4 in broadcasts, for example in stereo, if that's the case.
The phantom body is virtually indefinitely (just have a difference immediately after removal and after some time, but it will not go at all, if the person is not mentally Express the desire to remove phantom), removed the bracelet (even more coming in the mail to the addressee), also it is a working thing, just without direct contact are slightly weaker.Мартин wrote:The bracelet leaves a phantom body, which is a long time running after the removal, and the removed bracelet is also a workhorse, it should be remembered. I had something similar, but it concerned more the situation, not personal energy. Ie removing the wristband, I found a change in the vector, it was quick and I was a little reticent at the moment. I decided connecting the bracelet to the broadcast. But to be honest it's more a personal problem that needs to be reviewed just. To review you can, including with the bracelet in the broadcast.Артемка wrote: How to remove, feel weak, and after the return of BJ at hand, the weakness goes away, but not as quickly as it comes.
Well, do what you think?Андрей.В wrote:of the commercial I had long bracelet 2.2 I do not remember. didn't pay attention.
With clothes a real problem. Many centuries ago, long before the advent of the Japanese testers, Chinese specialists on Feng Shui, said leather, linen, cotton, wool, only they miss qi. With my gear I actually recently started to understand, but not everything is so sad, every year of course the number of acrylic increases, but famous brands usually use expensive natural materials, cotton clothes you can find at ridiculous prices, but the quality of the fabrics is still different. And there are some conventionally harmless artificial materials, for example their use in expensive sports clothes, there is sort of a breathing body and clothes even to stroke is not particularly necessary after washing, as there is no static.Михаил_ wrote: Synthetics are not the person simply eats it quietly, and natural fabric (linen/wool/cotton etc) - charges.
With 2.6 you can use all modules. Start mental: Activate the module Rejuvenation. If you need to add module amplifier for increased exposure.Лева wrote:Friends, tell me where you can find full information on modules
BJ. I've got 2.6 which can be used? Read the forum topic open to magic, but there is only a brief description of likely modules and how to run it is not written.
The search engine on the forum page , there's 2 , the upper right corner . Writing there:" Folding modules,"...and on the form there is such a topic. Read, copied, printed work with modules. 1. here : viewtopic.php?f=31&t=2883&start=25 on the second page in the post from Merkaba , detailed and numbered even . 2. Here viewtopic.php?t=4585Лева wrote:Friends, tell me where you can find full information on modules
BJ. I've got 2.6 which can be used? Read the forum topic open to magic, but there is only a brief description of likely modules and how to run it is not written.
2.6 bought consciously read the description I thought it fit to try what BJ, wear three weeks already. I have the card transfer only. Right now only examine what's whatИван Славов wrote:And, not last, take into consideration that quality 2.6 (Loew, You deliberately took 2.6, understanding what it is 2.6?) can give a partial taste of certain modules. For example "passage of air" may be different ways to work with a quality 2.5 and 2.6.Or "a big sphere of water." As an example only.
This is a serious instrumentarium, it is no coincidence that Michael recommended to get acquainted with the Principles of Tenacula, at least.