"even in the "geokulturines" the condition of the tubers in ten or more times greater than that of cereals and bean yield, however the ancient person, for whatever reason, suddenly ignores this fact. Thus the pioneer-farmer somehow believes that he has little difficulties, and further complicates his task, entering even the most complex treatment of the crop of all possible with more the whole industry (stone!) of the means of production.
Objective and unbiased analysis shows that life only becomes more complicated. For a variety of options early agriculture worsens the conditions of existence of ancient man. In particular, the "cabling" to land and depriving them of freedom of maneuver in adverse conditions, it periodically leads to severe hunger, overpopulation and mass epidemics, virtually unknown to the hunters and gatherers.
The geography of ancient agriculture causes further doubt in the fact that the transition to it of our ancestors, the feat of the lack of "fodder". According to N. And.Vavilov, agriculture appeared for some reason in the most affluent areas of the Earth where the preconditions for hunger was the least.
Another "detail": it is now universally recognized as the homeland of wheat is considered to be a narrow strip that surrounds the Mesopotamian plain. And from there the wheat is believed to be dispersed throughout the Earth. However, in this point of view is kind of "cheating" or the manipulation of data.
As a result of global research into different types of wheat Vavilov showed three independent from each other the source of origin of this culture. Syria and Palestine was the birthplace of "wild" wheat and wheat-odnosemjannyj; Abyssinia (Ethiopia) - the home of hard wheat; and the foothills of the Western Himalayas, the centre of origin soft wheat varieties. In General, Vavilov clearly comes to the conclusion that the statement about the homeland of wheat in Mesopotamia, or the assumption about the homeland of wheat in Central Asia have no reason, but he is the biggest specialist in this area. It was discovered that the difference between types of wheat signed on the deepest level: the wheat-odnoselchanka has 14 chromosomes; the "wild" and hard wheat with 28 chromosomes; soft wheat have 42 chromosomes. But even between "wild" wheat and hard varieties with the same number of chromosomes turned out to be an abyss: from "wild" you can't get hard without specific genetic changes !!!
Moreover, a similar pattern of "isolation" of cultural types from regions of distribution of their wild shapes there were still a number of plants (peas, chickpeas, flax, carrots, etc.) ! Wow it turns out a paradox: the homeland of wild varieties is not a trace of their cultivation, which is carried out in some other place where "wild" forms anymore!"
Anomalous news from around the world:
http://anomalia.kulichki.net/text5/009.htm<