You can get the necessary range of qualities, focusing not on the channel-the signature of the channel (in the sense of key-symbols) and not on a specific "place" of the lasso, namely the right quality - if you drag it from BJ - pull.
Some difference there may be. Channel as part of separationthe system works, as I understand it, as part of the system and egregorial machine (has its own egregor of the channel, the frequency of this subcontract), and the planetary as it is one of the working energy, well, sort of style, or imprint of a pattern.
Now I try to lead very far and very close analogy.
Zelazny. The Chronicles Of Amber.
Figure spicata (the lettering on the blade) gave rise to analogies in creation of a picture of ember, but was before him, and is not displayed, rather the contrary.
What am I?
Channel Arcana has some tried and tested algorithms of motivation, behavior, Sidhi and is part of the other side.
And the consciousness of the planet has its own experience, not collective, but personal. This is the reverse side of the system.
Here we (I mean everyone) have a cocoon that is woven of the structures, where the experience will be somehow.
This experience changes us and short-term and long-term and leaves the impression. But we are not aware of the whole brand experience, and what affects the current view of our personality.
Ie the experience of our cocoon can be described as a "system" and the body, in the sense of a cocoon like body different energy levels, lives some of his reflex-intelligent life.
But we are forcing it to perform those actions, which we consider consciously necessary.
Although it is forced to reckon with it (the body) a condition caused by the same experience that could give rise to Sidhi and injuries.
So.
I.e., my purely personal opinion of the planet there are much more kinds of energy qualities (well, about 4 package 8 x 8 i.e. 256 qualities, but may be wrong), than Arcana. But they are not tied egregorial structures that carry ready-made patterns of behavior, as in the case of Arcana, where you use them Sidhi had created acquired styles of behavior.
However, this does not mean that these things cannot be used.
By the way channel Reiki is from the same place, IMHO. Well, it raised the egregore, he's just outside the system, but it is the intra-earth, the planetary.
Have OLDI have a very strange work. Think is called "Mage in law", not sure.... recommend. It is heavy and a bit loaded, but if I can draw analogies, then maybe you will understand what I mean but there is a problem to explain in simple language.
Just if we do not climb to the planet through the system, and go through the set of energies of its components, that is ready algorithm from the outside, create something their own, in principle, new (have a great breadth of possibilities), but also have the opportunity to contact the "library", only it is arranged differently.
Actually the way the modules in BJ is not a clue for the stereotypes of the tried and tested techniques, ie for some aggregatable structure, but a conduit to the experience, which does not work as an autopilot, but as a hint for self-consciousness, and it works as it were from scratch, based on the "tutorial".
In General the verge of differences, subtle and almost abstract all this for understanding the topic, it is very difficult to explain as I perceive, the more do not want to create a new dogma.
The world is diverse. In fact, significant personal experience and result, and what I've said here is crap.
Try to pull directly to the quality and not follow the setting of the canal.<
