Bracelets Life

[Михаил_]

1. first to wear on the left hand(otherwise it will be not a very pleasant condition-there will be changes after the trauma and there is pain
2. SK there are no contraindications.
3. the older 2.6 is better, to avoid the 2.5 and 2.7 for a start

[м-р Фримэн]

And then where to carry?
Well, 2.6 is probably still far, he can only think to try... assumed after 1.0 to 2.0...

[Михаил_]

1.on the right hand.
2. for the first time, 1.0 will be enough if no outstanding health problems (lack of energy).

[м-р Фримэн]

On the right? And this is the same kind of work situations? By the way, did a couple days ago a small experiment, put Mammy on the left hand of my BJ 2.0 - she felt nothing, but I am! As soon as something feels bad, there was some very weak but the tremor in the body and the feeling on the left hand phantom bracelet, although usually when I take it off before a shower, for example, no such experience, and even sometimes can forget to put it back until you come across it hanging on the hook in the bathroom.... Wear almost without removing from the 18th of August.

[Михаил_]

While he keeps a bit of your trail - You would have strengthened the connection. After a short time it would be gone. The link probably pulled less energy than a bracelet he had given her.
Generally redcase case - me and others many times gave their bracelets to remember them is difficult even coma.

[м-р Фримэн]

Yes I somehow also did not expect... And what does that mean? Maybe that is why she needs a strong replenishment of energy? She's at the end of August there was a tremendous aggravation of osteoarthritis, still can not forget...

[Михаил_]

can.
Acute diagnoses in General should start with 1.0 and gently see how things go.
as for the right hand is also relative, i.e., there is not certainly. the words "better". (in the sense of the situation and work out) you're the strongest impact.

[м-р Фримэн]

Since You are here, Michael is also Polunochnaya, I wanted to ask Your advice..... Can't decide which is better to take SK or 2.6? Ideally, of course, and then another, and eventually it will, but right now the budget can't afford two artifacts.... It is necessary to work with situations for they are at a crossroads, and in fact for a long time – don't know what I want from life, or rather, where to apply, how to implement, what often arrive in a depression... well, it is time that something be urgently addressed! Five years spent on psychotherapy in particular has not borne fruit..... But with the acquisition of the 2.0 life has become as pleasant to skradyvatsya's depressing and kind of retreated, appeared smooth with + mood.... Therefore, great hopes for Your, Michael technology...

[Михаил_]

But neither that, nor another. Take better 2.5 and then add 2.6 or SK.
2.5 will give you the opportunity to find new ways, forms of interest and employment. (Read the blog Auraveda on my forum).

PS by the Way I don't polunochniki it's like I have a working day

[м-р Фримэн]

I thought about it, but I have another trouble - quickly light up, like it is interesting, and it is, but not strong enough on something to concentrate, to complete, often suffer choice reinsured and the result often remain in place... and 2.6 like, just gives the stability and strength to finish the job, as far as I understand from Your video? Still was thinking 2.5+2.6...
Yes, I also better to do something closer to the night...

[Михаил_]

and the day too nice he's just this long day.....

well, if You have 2.5 somewhere in nature there already, maybe 2.6 will be really good. Just do not expect quick results.

Why I recommend 2.5 - possible in spite of the randomness of the pulls on the choices among them are not really addicted, etc.
T..e 2.6 will contribute but for the finding and selecting of a new case of some he is not really an assistant, but in your question I saw it.

[м-р Фримэн]

Yes Michael, You are absolutely right, elections do turn out wrong and from this arises the feeling that all would not be taken is not mine, and not interesting.... Ie 2.5 should not only offer new options, but to help make the right choice?

[Михаил_]

its function is to harmonize the invariants. Choosing the right branches of development. I speak, read diary....
in my opinion there is clearly noticeable.

[Малыш]

what diary?

[Михаил_]

Above it is written what and where.

[АК]

Michael, could You comment on the following remark of B. M. Monosov in response to the question in the guest book SHEMA:

http://avvadon.org/html/modules/guestbo ... php?page=1

Pasha:

Boris Moiseevich, have You heard something about the "bracelet of life"?
http://openmagic.org/ph/showthread.php?t=1
http://openmagic.org/ph/showthread.php?t=4

now the Internet is full with a standing ovation on the effectiveness of this artifact.
[6507] Wed 29 Sep 2010, 14:26pm

BM:

1.About the "Bracelet of Life". One of our former student tried to skopirovat our car charger and pull the charger 17A. But our machine is not Electromechanical devices, they have a fine structure which copy is not possible. As for 17A, like all our systems it is equipped with protection which after some time can inverserotate spell. Nosy be reviewed after some time.
...
[6508] Thu 30 Sep 2010, 2:18am

[Михаил_]

You can of course
Boris Moiseevich people specific and does not love his attention to spread wider of their school without a good reason. I have it in principle, understanding a little in this.
According to the text response, he felt that something made by copying something from the Arsenal of the sh'MA, specifically, discs or charms 17БА, however, any sane and familiar with the subject person will notice that BJ is not a simple artifact 17БА, and complex artifact of his own - is not. Ie irrelevant.

The usual problem of "terminology". For BM, the phrase "of life" connects the artifact with the magic of life and specifically with a frequency band 17БА in the terminology of the school.
However, BJ absolutely multifrequency thing, except this has nothing to do with separationthe magic and specifically with the frequency 17 of the harness. All who use it long-term = know it.

In addition, the very form of the question was, assuming the answer IMMEDIATELY.

BM, as you know, mostly do not go to study other people's sites, thinks his school thing proper and strong, respectively. the wording in question is "teeming with a standing ovation," is straightforward and simple provocation looks like "hitting" on someone else's territory, something I didn't do(and what I just don't need), and did ask a question and have failed - quite logically, I would have said differently, but roughly in the same tone.

especially me personally, no applause of any of the parties is not known, nor in the direction of the BZ, nor in the direction of a respected school of Boris Moiseyevich. It's just a matter of resonance, of personal choice and there is no contradiction.In relation to the topics under discussion, the term "ovation" is generally not applicable.

In fact, some commanders SHEMA had the opportunity to test the BZ including older versions (particularly 2.5), and did not find in it anything similar to the artifacts SHEMA, especially given that they are directly linked to them (artifacts) sales. At the moment I have a proposal to place the entire range of products at the Moscow physical store artifacts of the school (tried to put link out, domain forum, BIZ turns into a smiley for some reason).
(only in the physical store, not online)
In connection with the extension of the product range beyond producing only SHEMA.
Due to the fact that the proposal did not come from me, and is a consequence of the experience with the BJ earlier, I'm not entirely forced and not forcing the opportunity, although not abandoning her. Asked a direct question on the attitude Monosov this broader range. Received no direct answer is given the go-ahead to take all that effective and can cause the interest of the buyer.

I think all reasonable people understand that a product that could have some relation to the violation of domestic laws or protections schools hardly would wish to put on display?

On the other hand a concept to which I adhere, not very close to BM and I suspect that if he was plagued with questions about what the answers will be approximately in the same spirit - that is absolutely fine. He defends the vitality of their projects (extension of range), and the vitality of the school (protection of the territory from other pictures of the world, schools, projects)- as demonstrated in the response.

In General, the BZ is not and can not be nothing of the technology of the SHEMA. Moreover, its creation was not used for anything even a little bit similar to the theory, practice and the elements of the world picture SHEMA.
When creating a version 1.0 by the way, on the contrary, had much to rebuild them, since at the time I was there and heard it is extremely interfere with the creation of the first version - in their worldview, it is not entirely as possible, during its creation used the concept is much different from the one that gives SHEMA. Prevented me from ACC. what were some tails due to the work with their model, which was perceived as direct interference and which had to be deactivated, to create a 1.0.
I think it's clear that the concepts and models of the world may be many, and even very different, are not mutually exclusive.
A very decent number of active past or present students of the SHEMA uses the BZ, some of them have full access to technology (the entrance to the restricted area of my site), some of my personal friends after meeting with the technology of the BZ went to practice in the SHEMA, in order to obtain certain practical training, i.e. for the sake of training with a coach - it's up, I don't see the problem, despite the difference of concepts, there is a proven training system (I mean courses), which allow to increase the practical level of having a master control of the teacher.
From personal training it has high filtering "glitches".
So I used myself as an effective trainer and some of my colleagues using it held.

Thus, despite the difference in concepts and some "touch" spaces, I see no problem, except that can certainly be people who WOULD LIKE to in our relationship this has been. With the BM principle in the direction of the BZ without the "thunder in the clear sky" cannot be attention and relationships. Such is his perception of the world and it is not for us to discuss.
For me it is no doubt that a large part of the world Monosov perceives as not worthy of attention and interest, so it will not explore it here or there is REALLY happening. And in this I do not see any problem. It is his right, he is really quite an old creation, he is busy in their activities and defends their territory. Links to anything in his personal guest, the purpose of which answers to questions students of the school (and often they write the questions are not well-known personalities were not always adequate), the references given there to other MAG. resources is already offtopic and looks like hidden advertising. I would not have wanted to link to my site was hanging there - it is a direct violation of the order in the guest. Ie asked the question:
-created a provocation,
-used the opportunity to ask a question not targeted
-provide a link to another resource (not tactful)
... and received well in advance the obvious answer-the formal reply.<

[м-р Фримэн]

its function is to harmonize the invariants. Choosing the right branches of development. I speak, read diary....
in my opinion there is clearly noticeable.

Thank you Michael for your timely responses! Be sure to read...

[АК]

Michael, thanks for the detailed response.

[Михаил_]

By the way, a small addition, regarding the previous question about opinions, Arcana, schools and theories, a clear example of one.
Just for the second question, about 2.5 and 2.6
the following reading is not required - is replete with specialized terminology from different schools.

Those who have read the translation or the original of the book Welz, probably remembers that he politely pointed out some typical error - namely, make the tree of Life (the tree of life, known of course not only in the SHEMA but in a large number of schools working within this tradition from all over the world) for the whole world, while it is only a kind of simplified map of the area, but not the terrain itself (not an exact quote, who wants to find this place in the book from Karl himself).

The world is big.

If we consider the 2.6 in the concept of the SHEMA, it would be a quality 16БА (well nearest appropriate that comes to mind and is associated with the increase of inertial mass and with the past, clearly manifested in 2.6, if you can offer some 1-22БА - I will be glad to hear ). An attempt to combine 16БА with 17БА (assuming its presence as a basis BJ, which is not true), would give a simple arithmetical sum(see rules of summation of the energies of BA and give the result), i.e. the acting force would be 16+17=33=6, which is also somehow not ACC. effect, i.e. the practice of using BJ. Same story with the 2.5. (14+17=31=4, other ideas?)

In addition, the data BZ has the characteristics of the forces of Homo-and Hetero Tenacula, but have no natural changes(including the manifested shifts of time) that exist within the tree of Sephiroth that would have to occur, whether the specific quality of these versions is caused by the presence of energies or resonances with those or other channels of the Big Arcana.

BJ made using another "window" into the world, no less real and well-connected with other "Windows".

It's just the practice of using many and reviews-reviews-reviews.
Yes we have all these qualities without modifying the system БЖ2.0, i.e. of the same whole, without changing the basis.But BA is a different frequency though. different settings and so on.

So... lyrically technical deviation, which shows that the world is much more diverse than any "technical documentation" on him. Any model school or theory give a "snapshot" of a flat or incomplete projection, or many of them, but it is an error to limit ourselves to the theory at the expense of experience and practice. Many get the EXPERIENCE and the credibility of the entire ONE theory that gave rise to this private experience, isolate yourself from the perception of the other. I have seen many times.

In principle, I more or less explained in detail why it happens and why there is a difference, for example in the responses to the EAS(by the way the student of the SHEMA) on my forum,the last one was in the section "Bureau".

In other words, the practice of various traditions, gives seemingly contradictory results that actually says just that, looking in one window and in another window, we see only pieces of the whole and him trying to judge "the elephant", although in ordinary life, not in the traditions of the schools, we are dealing with an elephant in General, and not dismemberment......

Sorry for the detailed digression, but in recent days I answer "about the guest" a few times I have answered a completely different but somewhat similar questions from users in a personal and simply once to give detailed explanations than return to the theme again and again (time sorry).

I hope conceptually clear.<

[АК]

Well, as I understand it, BM also believes the scheme Sephiroth relatively primitive. So, in the Psychotronics he writes that:

the Ancients operated on a very complex multidimensional model of the world and, of course, our current ideas about the Tree of life as the scheme of planetary consciousness as primitive, as an explanation of the principles of aircraft construction with the symbols of the airplane at the military map.

By the way, when I looked through the website SHEMA, in some place (sorry, I do not remember where) I stumbled on a replica of the BM, where it says that, say, his Teacher in this life him all about this Tree cleared up.. something that really is, but he, ie, BM, refuses to talk about it to others. Well, I mean, "know but won't tell you."

[сокол]

Michael, I never understood what kind of sound (similar to the way runes) and who is the author of the setting items...
yet Menne, as an experiment, I took the bracelet from hemalata, stone, which is used in rituals in ancient times and the middle ages (its other name sanguine, blood stone, etc.). The material, which is nakladyvat information, as I understand it has a secondary meaning...
Alas, when progrevanie prizoshel incident - came electricians to change the counters, turned off the electricity, resulting in 1.5 cases recording has stopped. Then I resumed playing on the day. This can povljana on the quality of the experiment?

[сокол]

and by the way, I was wondering, who sings on the record in track 1 and track 4 (especially liked the song about the forest, lake and man, Nenasheva true faith either in the world or in the monastery...). Who is the author? Not Kalugin?

[Воффка]

Falcon
The author of the song "ostapowicz Dmitry", the name "Monk in the world"

[ЛИЛИЯ-Р]

Alas, when progrevanie prizoshel incident - came electricians to change the counters, turned off the electricity, resulting in 1.5 cases recording has stopped. Then I resumed playing on the day. This can povljana on the quality of the experiment?

Can be repeated.