Petr99 wrote:As I understand it, stabe impact on the world comes from the area of NATO, i.e., the operator carries out the impact from the world of NATO. It happens without the stabilizer, but the stub structures, and enhances the operator.
In the activator zone neito no, instead there is a zone of formation of the buffer from the personal world of the operator, i.e. the operator carries out his creative energy and the impact is also structured, as in stave, but has very many advantages, which you can learn about in Seminary sanitech personal worlds.
No.
Not so.
The operator of the stabilizer holds the projection of his view of the world in the world (and here from the world of NATO? just where this area is).
Tell me, I'm talking about personal peace and buffer in the aspect of the webinar activator?
There is a model of the world (it automatically is in soznane operator as the archetype) and in the case of the activator it is not a model of the world and the typical for the operator the process of the projection operator in his area (which is a thing specified mental) and it NATO and boundaries are not inherent to what "I think" statement. He works in the area of active influence. Nothing is said about the buffer. This is a different description of the same process. To date, this approach effectively to influence, and the boundaries and NATO not as relevant at the same time, no one bothers to use the activator and stabilizer together. I'm not going to shoot production stabilizers, and free to do. Just the approach is different.