BJ 2.1 / 2.2 / 2.4

[АндрейКо]

Michael_ Thank you!

The path is clear - the mother-in-law 4 БЖ1.0 + harmonization of the apartment, and the rest as it will.

[Михаил_]

Mother-in-law it'd Lite 1.0

[Хастред]

Tell and 2 weeks of continuous wear 2.1, it is sufficient to attempt to use the bracelet to display the properties in the new 1.0 clean the bracelet and whether it is possible to use module replication or is it better to use this group of modules (the"Primary grain";"Loading channel";"the Structuring of the channel";"Loading modules";).
and since I'm not sure in availability of required number of power I have, is it possible to give an additional feeding through the module power stone.

To show the bracelet 1.0 use wet will reluctantly because been reading here that the world is actively resisting and the result can be incomplete, just want to give it to your friends bracelets and purchase 20 headphones for guaranteed results nehochetsya

[АндрейКо]

Hatred I'm certainly a novice, but he transferred only if it is IMPOSSIBLE to do it in another way. (for example, a person suffered a stroke to look at him scared... and to help as you want - it is for move) but I think that WET would be STRONGER.

Make bracelets easy - (I'm on 2-3 pieces at a time charged) water after charging for bath use...
After the nth batch of the world will begin to resist less (or just stop paying attention).

About sufficiency - you try to move and check then

[Хастред]

regarding sufficiency - you try to move and check then

I'm afraid that I can not check if something will be wrong, and I do not feel that your way and his impact should be much greater than 1.0, except to give a friend a fresh charged and to check his unconscious reaction to the unconscious desire to get the bracelet.

okay I'll buy a batch of ears of the player)

[Петрос]

Hatred drop the expectations, often excessive expectations lead to fatigue and frustration. it did not take much time fun BJ

[Маг.нет]

Hmm, and what "ears" of the party? Only one kit, the earphones function as an emitter for modulating sound vibrations, tracks of locality - insulated layers and a water pad space to make it "special properties", and the bracelets are charged while in the variable - phased modulated tracks environment and from the fact that the headphone will not a couple, but hundreds, if a small amount is covered by the vibration and with the one set, a significant difference will not be noticeable.


Sincerely, MAG.no 〠

[Хастред]

Hmm, and what "ears" of the party?

this is the case if the water leak and make the sport one of the ears I have in stock a couple escho

I just thought that a copier will be safer and then Michael wrote in the topic about creating a bracelet that

you can copy. By the way I am today, the copier duplicated the bracelet, about an hour socks on the arm of the original and where was the copy. Was very moshnenko. When copying complicated qualities, however, may not be enough energy and time to they are properly ordered.

so we decided to clarify whether I understood everything about copying and there will be enough of my capabilities.
but if you say that the wet charging more so I will do it

[Маг.нет]

If well wrapped, using the recommendation below neatly wrapped by the film was not only a "charging pack", but the earphone wire, the more likely moisture will escape.
Well, it's Michael_, he has this skill of copying as a mechanism, works well, and the energy to implement processes "copier" appropriate, if such possibilities are in doubt, the "wet charge" will still be reliable.......


Sincerely, MAG.no 〠

[ЛИЛИЯ-Р]

this is the case if the water leak and make the sport one of the ears I have in stock a couple escho

That is truly a difficult task Take a glove or something that is not wet,then pack what you'll charge,put drops headphones then everything is wrapped in foil,and repeated several times :film-foil.......This is the screen from external influences .All this in a glove ,release the air to drowned it all. But the top gloves or wrapped with tape....Then in a bowl of water ,but not drown the entire glove. Leave the top(neck )out and attach to the edge of the container, at least a pin. And a thread load for drowning gloves if gloves content will be easy. Pour water into the container and PRESTO. run 1 track the hours remaining on the day. Not to drown ,many things to think of. The neck in the foam(will be float) and ......

[Андрей С.]

I'm the "copier" is used rarely, only when there are no pictures of the person, because if it is, simply using the generator to apply the same Panacea or 2.1. But, when you use a logical-causal result do not keep track, they just knowthat all works fine.

[Маг.нет]

Well a loose concept.......
All the methods described enable the BZ working, BUT give a different degree of obviousness of the structures on the media can be compared to display different resolutions of the same pictures show the same object but are different, the number (capacity) of useful information about the details of the object (the comparison for example, the imposition of structures of the BZ on images with different resolutions give the same result - the overlay is not on the image but on the object it describes - link). By the way it is (capacity) and differ in the most part of commercial Products from their Lite-Lite version, which is reflected also in their efficiency, although both of these working. Potential functions "copy" depends on the capacity of the mental Operator (relatively speaking capacity and the same pixels), someone's mind can handle at a time mnogoletniy thread-safe information, and who is......., the system of "wet charge" of 1.0 (and others) has a certain degree of obviousness on the media and depends little on potential manufactures (but to some extent the ease of use of all or of a part from 100% of the structures depends on the capacity of the Operator - user that BJ - how much can you handle at the moment, although it is worth noting the potential, in the presence of sources of information and sufficient energy to interact with these sources may be expanded with the active work of consciousness). Easier is not always better.......


Sincerely, MAG.no 〠

[Андрей С.]

No doubt I in any case do not deny the relevance of the "wet charge", as well as the value of physical media in some cases. Just for this task - one way or another "deal" BJ a certain group of "ordinary" people - the most simple and efficient I see that is generating the images (if you have photos, of course). First, 2.1 tougher and more powerful 1.0, Panacea is well programmed and can also be switched to 2.9. Secondly, not TO 1.0. Thirdly, no problems with not wanting to wear the bracelet and explanation (especially for skeptics). But it's all in this formulation of the question. When more capacity I would have used the card for the transfer.

[Маг.нет]

first, 2.1 tougher and more powerful than 1.0

Yes, if you compare a commercial version 2.1 with home-made 1.0, BUT let's assume that the structure of 2.1 is conventionally 1000 points of appearance in the volume, the commercial version was able to display let's say 100 of them (and the Operator interacts with only part of it), and homemade (even overlay) "caught" a few and here we have an example of 1/20 of the commercial version BJ 2.1, whether it's 2.1, so be whether this stronger version 1.0 of "wet" (quite thick) charge - not the fact, of course 1.0 not TO, Yes, and some properties 2.1, but it clearly say I would not dare. Further, with regard to the imposition of structures on the Object through the photo, how it happens, what is the mechanism of this transfer? Computer? - he does not work directly with the World (if there is no such program and points of engagement for interaction). The consciousness of "subject" (even if he does not realize it). And the capacity of this transfer as well (as with the "copier") will depend on the capacity of the mental "subject" - its density and ability to process huge amount of information in the moment, how much volume such information in terabyte Michael_ wrote in comments to the roller 3.1, so there is a difference not only in the fact that is imposed, but who does....... although in any case, such imposition of a "how to" works, but not comparable with the commercial version even at times. The overlay itself will be more effective than the other. Do you understand why?


Sincerely, MAG.no 〠

[Андрей С.]

I agree with what you say The result of the comparison "overlays" to the commercial versions of the obvious, in favor of the latter, but we're talking now about what you can do yourself, so if people wanted to give friends a commercial product, he would have used the card transfer (which I mentioned as the most suitable option when possible). Next. Yes, in the "overlay" works and the one who imposes (because he is the operator), but this method has several advantages over the "Copier": first, clearly defined information used; second, corny for consciousness, it's easier; third, other things being equal, a more powerful version. Theoretically it is possible that internal resources will last for up 1.0, but not enough for 2.1, but in practice to me it seems highly questionable... as for the comparison of the "wet charge" and "overlays", you are right that it is impossible so unambiguously to say (especially from the operator depends a lot), for different tasks better suited to different decisions about what I actually say

[Маг.нет]

Nothing prevents you to compare to not assume, and positioning.......
I made my conclusions based on the study results. From the potential of the Operator in such actions (of interinos) much depends, in some cases, it is more important than "density of primary sources", so that there 1000 points, if consciousness is able to process in the moment 10 of them, not aby what to choose, and those who had seen enough - "caught" from this Operator, so if it passes (or "imposes" structure fotomaton), then the other user and these 10 points for the manifestation of the structure may not be perceived (just "catch" only some of them, although each such "point" as it will acquire its characteristic structure the principle of the charging system). Of course it is theoretically possible to imagine everything, but almost....... "Wet" charging will get more powerful in the absolute majority, because it relies not on the minds of the loader (although it is catchy, activating certain areas of intentions), and on modulation of the local space, which affects the objects there are, something somewhat similar with certain principles "engine charging" commercial versions. The overlay on the photo as an operational measure.


Sincerely, MAG.no 〠

[Михаил_]

Here nafludit debaters actually made a number of assumptions and thus the conclusions are not correct. But I do not hunt now to fix it all and to explain where exactly the error could be then .... I would say the discussion is not so important to the topic (2.1) has an indirect relationship.

[Маг.нет]

What is not so clear, this charge is not quite interinos, or rather not interinos, and the excitation of resonances (although it also requires reading and translation structures let unconsciously), but in this context I deliberately omitted to not overload, the essence of the "density of charge" and its dependence on the attached "arrangements" does not change....... What is indirect relationship agree, but there is the unanswered question of whether the user is using 2.1 after 2 weeks of use to do copier BJ BJ 1.0 is equivalent to the "wet charge"? Then added, not easier to replace the "wet charge" on photomethod? Flood? I wash my hands.......


Sincerely, MAG.no 〠

[Смелый]

Sincerely, MAG.no 〠

And this in the end of the signature, cute in a skullcap and with a smile from ear to ear - who is he?
Happy New Year!
All the best!

[Михаил_]

this is not interinos and PixelNet consciousness to it has a General indirect relationship rather than a direct

[Андрей С.]

then There were added, not easier to replace the "wet charge" on photomethod?

No. I initially talked about replacing the copier with photomethod

[Маг.нет]

Uncut.......

then There were added, not easier to replace the "wet charge" on photomethod?

No. I initially talked about replacing the copier with photomethod

no doubt I in no case do not deny the relevance of the "wet charge", as well as the value of physical media in some cases. Just for this task - one way or another "deal" BJ a certain group of "ordinary" people, the most simple and effective I see that is generating the images (if you have photos, of course). First, 2.1 tougher and more powerful 1.0, Panacea is well programmed and can also be switched to 2.9. Secondly, not TO 1.0. Thirdly, no problems with not wanting to wear the bracelet and explanation (especially for skeptics). But it's all in this formulation of the question. When more capacity I would have used the card for the transfer.

this is not interinos and PixelNet consciousness to it has a General indirect relationship rather than a direct

Yes, not interinos, but the consciousness in one of the aspects works in the similar way - is one of the steps in a guide for "charging BJ" though not consciously, the so-called "PixelNet" is only one of the parameters influencing the final result such copy, as well in this context is also influenced by the density of the perception of the Operator structures of the BZ (and their "charging system") - the quantity and quality of "resonant structures" BJ with this Operator, albeit indirectly, but I have observed as significant.

Bold happy New year!
Prosperity!


Sincerely, MAG.no 〠<

[Андрей С.]

uncut.......

no. I originally talked about replacing the copier with photomethod

I "copier"I use rarely, only when there are no pictures of the person, because if it is, simply using the generator to apply the same Panacea or 2.1.

Huh?
About the "wet charge" that you have in the following post started a conversation. You quoted my post talking about "the distribution of a specific group of ordinary people". Which is often impossible to give out the bracelets and, especially, to persuade them to wear. Sorry, but I have the impression that you read my posts diagonally.

I kind of understand what the error in reasoning. The process of "charging BJ" is not "charging" and is not infopreneur, as it is not based on drawing information of the object at all. Michael could even say "teach math. part" and would have been right, as it is the basics. The object becomes the BZ due to changes in the relationship of Peace to it that causes certain resonances. In the "wet charge" these resonances are realized at the expense of sound, 2.1 is live. And I see a misconception that if you overlay runs exclusively the consciousness of the subject - by this logic, it turns out that if you put a bracelet on a monitor that replayed videos (and many do BJ), the work is also mind put? No. The point is that the video (and the storyboard with him) carry the resonance that is projected onto the object, directly or through a link. And, by the way, the main difference between the commercial versions - in the purity of the resonance (higher quality tuning fork) and in certain abnormal conditions, unattainable at home.<

[Михаил_]

this is a correct reasoning consciousness in the methods like "copier" only need to replace the "wet method" = its potential is used to generate the anomalies and call resonance, the rest does sort of world, not entirely of course, but not the operator.
In the case of video or storyboard - the influence of the operator is minimal, you can easily check by comparing the versions made by different people including not knowing what they are doing and so on, and also made a random overlay on some photos and bases and so on, although you can always specify that consciousness climbed the chain and identified where there is an overlay and it worked, but it's not.
However, the wet method and the truth is often better, although I believe that it is easier to use a 1.0 light (stronger) and panacea Lite (even more), regardless of the operator.
IMHO the wet method is good for beginners - in order to obtain a relatively soft product.
Copier depends on the properties of consciousness over-anomality a large area. More than a few thousand I haven't tried yet. But do not depend in any way from PixelNet.
Therefore, there is a large loss of energy in any person, regardless of the whims of his mind.
The overlay on the photo works through a double resonance and the operator does NOT. It can be verified.

[Маг.нет]

In the previous or the next cringe, but I do not care. 2.1 video and overlay are two different mechanisms. If you play this video "be here", and charged the facility will be "out there" (outside the direct access of the charging system), the quality (appearance) of the charge will depend on the communication channel between them (even a link) that will be able to create Your consciousness (in this charging system, otherwise provided for), and he in turn just will depend on the potential "density" and "energoremontnoe" of consciousness. "The purity of resonance" depends on the number of resonant "points" of the multidimensional Object, call it even a tuning fork..


Sincerely, MAG.no 〠
PS Michael_, checked photomethod, the output on different people charge photos one Operator is roughly the same (much weaker than the movie), but is perceived by users differently, that is not true of 2.1 bracelets made by the stream of video, but the overlay made by different Operators in different ways. What is double resonance is not understood.
The fact that consciousness is involved only at one stage I checked it and what the whole process (the aspect of the response of the World) dropped.
As for the "pixelpost" - one mind can hold the whole text, and another 3 words and will not remember.......